The Belmont City Council adopted what it hopes to be its final version of the city’s housing element, a detailed blueprint outlining how the city will achieve its state-mandate housing goals, or Regional Housing Needs Allocation.
Every eight years, the California Housing and Community Development Department assigns each municipality its RHNA allocation, which it must review and officially approve, or certify.
The most recent 2023-31 cycle was more notably aggressive than previous rounds. Belmont must plan for 1,785 housing units by 2031, which is almost a four-fold increase in its RHNA allocation compared to 2015-23.
San Mateo County’s total state-mandated housing targets, across all income levels, increased by about 4% between the 2007-14 and 2015-23 cycles. But from the last cycle to the current 2023-31 round, there was a nearly 200% bump.
The heightened state oversight has also led to more protracted review and approval processes. Over a year and a half into the housing element process, Belmont isn’t the only city in the county to still not receive an official stamp of approval. About eight other jurisdictions in the county, including Daly City, Half Moon Bay and San Bruno, technically do not have a certified housing element, according to the HCD website.
Some advocates have placed blame on some cities’ reluctance to make substantive housing progress, while many jurisdictions point to HCD’s inconsistent reviews and lengthy delays as the reason for noncompliance.
Recommended for you
But Belmont officials are optimistic this will be the last version of the housing element they’ll have to resubmit to HCD, as it was found to be “substantially compliant” by the state this summer.
Assistant City Manager Kathy Kleinbaum said there are not many substantive differences between the original version and current housing element, but some of the changes involve its approach to accessory dwelling units and assumptions about potential site development and density.
“This basically meant being a lot more conservative in our approach to the assumptions in the analysis, including having more conservative or reduced assumptions for the density that those housing sites would develop as,” Kleinbaum said. “We did remove some smaller sites from the inventory … but no additional sites were added to the sites’ inventory from what was previously considered back in January.”
The city also updated its approach to ADUs. While the state has passed more legislation over the last couple of years to proliferate more ADU development, the city added more policies to encourage development, such as allowing more flexible unit sizes and working with the county on potential loans for ADU development.
The council unanimously adopted the housing element, which will be submitted to the state. HCD has 60 days to review and likely certify the document.
“I think Belmont has a good story to tell as it relates to the affordable housing we’ve been doing and what we will continue to do to make our city inclusive,” Councilmember Davina Hurt said.
I think it is time to give Sacramento the middle finger on this one. Whatever law was enacted should be repealed. We should be able to determine how many houses we want or need in our own community. Democracy? Are you kidding!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
I think it is time to give Sacramento the middle finger on this one. Whatever law was enacted should be repealed. We should be able to determine how many houses we want or need in our own community. Democracy? Are you kidding!
Dirk, I agree. The state is turning cities into sardine cans and we the people have had enough. It's time for an initiative.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.