Windy and partly cloudy this evening. Mostly cloudy with diminishing winds after midnight. Low 53F. W winds at 20 to 30 mph, decreasing to 10 to 15 mph. Higher wind gusts possible..
Tonight
Windy and partly cloudy this evening. Mostly cloudy with diminishing winds after midnight. Low 53F. W winds at 20 to 30 mph, decreasing to 10 to 15 mph. Higher wind gusts possible.
Two dueling business tax measures in San Francisco — Propositions C and D — are both lagging behind the necessary majority each needs in order to pass, early results showed Tuesday night.
Prop D, or the “Overpaid CEO Salary Tax,” proposes to increase tax rates of large businesses and corporations through changing the city’s tax structure as a way to increase revenue for the city. As of Tuesday, 55% of ballots counted have rejected Prop D.
Prop C is a competing measure that was drawn up as a way to try and defeat Prop D. It proposes reducing tax rates for small and medium-sized businesses by increasing the exemption ceiling for the Gross Receipts Tax. Voters have voiced stronger opposition to Prop C than Prop D, with around 64% voting against Prop C.
Because Propositions D and C are competing measures, the one with the most votes will go into effect in the event that both are passed by voters. But so far, both measures have a long way to go in order to pass.
The city currently collects a Top Executive Pay Tax from businesses when their highest-paid employee earns more than 100 times the median salary paid to their San Francisco employees. That tax rate increases based on how much the top executive’s pay exceeds that of its San Francisco employees.
Prop D would alter the Top Executive Pay Tax by calculating the rate to include the median income of all employees, not just those in San Francisco. The measure also proposes to add more gross receipts taxes and administrative taxes on businesses that are subject to the Top Executive Pay Tax.
Some opponents of Prop D have backed Prop C, a competing measure to reduce tax rates for small and medium-sized businesses by increasing the exemption ceiling for the Gross Receipts Tax.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.