Editor,
In her guest perspective appearing in the Jan. 20 Daily Journal, Karen Tuzman splits the idea of “The American Dream” into Individual and Collective American Dreams. The split is disingenuous.
Editor,
In her guest perspective appearing in the Jan. 20 Daily Journal, Karen Tuzman splits the idea of “The American Dream” into Individual and Collective American Dreams. The split is disingenuous.
The original American Dream is as she quotes, “Life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone.” That from an individual perspective this means happiness and prosperity on a personal level should not conflict with the idea that it should be possible for everyone to achieve personal happiness. It is not a collective dream. Collective is an invention that makes a person feel superior when her rules and laws restrict the majority in the name of, oh say, “equity” rather than “equality of opportunity.”
Tuzman asserts that the reason for Senate Bill 9 is that local zoning laws prohibit blacks from moving into single-family home neighborhoods and are rooted in segregationist practice. The assertion is merely another invention. Mark Olbert in his guest perspective in the Jan. 24 Daily Journal gives many excellent reasons why SB 9 is state government usurping local control over housing policy.
Zoning laws, or local control of neighborhoods, is rarely if ever politically motivated. SB 9 as Tuzman states, is a law targeting local control and it is politically motivated. The ideology behind SB 9 is that we who live in these local neighborhoods are white and racist, because we set standards for residency in our neighborhoods that black people cannot meet. Not now nor ever. Like much of today’s Democrat platform, the ideology leads to law-making that is authoritarian, inefficient, redristributive, unnecessary, and more than inconvenient to the populace at large.
We’ll see you Democrats at the polls this November!
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
An excellent letter showing how the left is using Senate Bill 9 as a means to promote more authoritarian government in Sacramento.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.