We owe a great debt of gratitude to the seasoned leaders who have guided our community to where it is today. Their dedication and experience have shaped our cities and county, and their contributions are appreciated. However, the future is upon us, and we must recognize the need for fresh perspectives and new energy in our leadership.
Our cities and county are at a crossroads, facing challenges and opportunities that require innovative solutions and a vision for a more inclusive and sustainable future. To address these issues effectively, we must elect young, progressive leaders who can bring fresh ideas and a modern approach to governance. These emerging leaders are more attuned to the diverse needs of our community, and they are eager to tackle the pressing issues of our time, such as affordable housing, environmental sustainability, homelessness, transparency and accountability in government and social justice.
It’s not just about age but about bringing new voices and perspectives into the conversation. The younger generation is passionate, informed and ready to lead. They bring with them a deep understanding of the technological, social and environmental landscapes that define our world today.
As we approach this election cycle, let’s show our appreciation for the leaders who have served us well, but make a conscious choice to support and elect the new wave of progressive leaders who are ready to take our cities and county into the future.
Recommended for you
We are fortunate to have the next generation of leaders in every city and at the county level. Join me in voting to begin the change this election cycle.
Jim Lawrence
Foster City
The letter writer is the former mayor of Foster City and former chair of the San Mateo County District Lines Advisory Committee.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Lawrence, but aren’t you attempting to promote age discrimination which, I believe, is illegal? Besides, where’s the evidence that “younger” leaders have promoted a better outcome for society? Instead of voting based on age/discrimination why don’t we vote based on merit and track records of those who are, or were, in office? If we’re happy with their current/past performance, there’s no need to discriminate against them by choosing a younger candidate. If we’re not happy with their performance, then choose another candidate, but not based on age.
Thanks Jim, these are important thoughts. I hear people say they won't vote because their vote isn't important in the national election, but it is so very important on the local level. We each can make an impact on the local level, and I would encourage everyone to research and have conversations about who they want representing their communities. We do need people who will consider fresh and progressive ideas and programs. These are the leaders who will progress onward into state and national politics.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Lawrence, but aren’t you attempting to promote age discrimination which, I believe, is illegal? Besides, where’s the evidence that “younger” leaders have promoted a better outcome for society? Instead of voting based on age/discrimination why don’t we vote based on merit and track records of those who are, or were, in office? If we’re happy with their current/past performance, there’s no need to discriminate against them by choosing a younger candidate. If we’re not happy with their performance, then choose another candidate, but not based on age.
Thanks Jim, these are important thoughts. I hear people say they won't vote because their vote isn't important in the national election, but it is so very important on the local level. We each can make an impact on the local level, and I would encourage everyone to research and have conversations about who they want representing their communities. We do need people who will consider fresh and progressive ideas and programs. These are the leaders who will progress onward into state and national politics.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.