Editor,
I appreciate columnist Mark Simon referencing my letter questioning our leaders prioritizing spending our share of transportation funds for Caltrain electrification over grade crossings.
Editor,
I appreciate columnist Mark Simon referencing my letter questioning our leaders prioritizing spending our share of transportation funds for Caltrain electrification over grade crossings.
Caltrain electrification will have negligible impact, but 10 grade crossings would have made a big improvement for traffic and prevented accidents.
Mr. Simon is savvy enough to know the real reason for electrification is to pave the way for high-speed rail. Like him, I am a fan of HSR, having ridden them in Europe, I just don’t believe running it down the Peninsula to San Francisco is wise. Rather than running a dead-end dogleg, which is costly and problematic, they should go straight to Sacramento, connecting with Caltrain or BART in San Jose, or in the East Bay as Amtrak does now.Â
I agree with Mark that funding that is approved for specific projects should be used for those purposes. California leadership, however, has a habit of repurposing voter approved funding, i.e., Prop. 63 (mental health act), among many others, and nobody has gone to jail yet.
Tim Donnelly
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Donnelly, but I’d say spending transportation funds for everything else outside the train-to-nowhere is a better option. High speed rail is nothing but a union labor giveaway and I’d bet that someone who first joined a union and began working on the so-called high speed rail could work their entire career on the train-to-nowhere and then retire without ever having to work anywhere else. And without ever getting a chance to ride from SoCal to NorCal on this sham project. Let’s hope federal funds for this boondoggle train is cut off. I can’t imagine other states are thrilled to subsidize rail construction in CA.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.