For any number of justifiable reasons, there is considerable controversy surrounding a decision by San Mateo County authorities to locate a facility for the homeless in Millbrae.
There are a variety of concerns expressed by opponents ranging from the eventual financial cost of the move to the city and to fears of negative impacts caused by future hotel residents.
Millbrae officials themselves are not pleased at all. They released a statement to that effect earlier this month. One of their salient gripes is that the county’s leadership, operating in heavy-handed fashion, did not keep Millbrae in the loop prior to the issue flaring into the public domain.
The county’s message for much of the process was, basically, “We’ve decided; it’s a done deal; like it or lump it.” Not a lot of room for discussion. The consequences have been most unpleasant.
Looming over this divisive issue is a factor that’s rarely discussed: the often confusing and misunderstood nature of the county’s authority — and, specifically, that of the Board of Supervisors — itself.
The good citizens of Millbrae, who are just now coming to grips with all of this, have a point. How and why do the supervisors, none of whom live in Millbrae, have the power to order a separate, self-governed city to accept a stark and undesired (for some) change in the use of a key property along its main drag?
But, that’s the reality, and it’s part of the governing structure of the state of California. Millbrae denizens, more than most in the county, find themselves buffeted by outside forces, often faceless and well beyond their control.
It’s not just the supervisors who exercise authority over key aspects of Millbrae life. Let’s look at some prime examples. Here goes:
• BART. The massive transit station and its operations, shared with Caltrain, dominate a southeastern quadrant of the town. Development of that prime property has had major impacts, not all of them good.
• SFO. The busy nearby international airport, located on the Bayfront on the east side of Highway 101, and its related support services are more like a city within a city by any reasonable definition. It is controlled by the city and county of San Francisco.
• The aggressive state of California itself. Led by some of our own local politicians, the state has altered long-standing laws and regulations governing the zoning of properties, taking control away from municipal officials and their constituents.
All in all, it’s easy to understand why a lot of Millbrae residents, homeowners in particular (along with some business interests), are feeling growing pressure from entities outside their community with little or no recourse in the bargain.
By essentially springing the notion of buying the La Quinta Inn on the Millbrae citizenry without carefully preparing the way by being proactive in communicating what was coming down the pike, the county set itself up for controversy and outrage.
Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered when, or how, the county had gotten out the word on the future of the hotel. It’s entirely possible that, no matter what the county did on this issue, a sizable segment of Millbrae’s population would have objected — and loudly.
We’ll never know. What we do know is that too many living in Millbrae believe they have been blindsided by too many authorities from outside the town. Considerable fence-mending should be in the offing. Whether that will bear fruit remains to be seen.
JERRY COLEMAN PASSES AT 86: It is with sadness that we learned of the death of Jerry Coleman, a public servant here in San Mateo County for a combined three decades in the County District Attorney’s Office and later as Burlingame’s city attorney. His tenures here were marked by a calm, professional demeanor and a gentle sense of humor that helped to defuse potentially divisive situations. He passed away last month at the age of 86 in Sebastopol.
(2) comments
I cannot believe how many pathological liars there is within those running SM County government - those running Mid-Penn and those running HomeKey.
There are substantiated failures emanating from Shores Landing at 1000 Twin Dolphins Drive.
Cut and dry episodes of felons who reside there, assaulting and threatening fellow residents + attacking other citizens inside Sam Trans buses - where zero was done by the appropriate entities.
What a shame. I wonder how those in charge even sleep at night.
Hello, John
Blindsided? Maybe. However, when the county's proposal started to get noticed, it appears the Board of Supervisors... with the exception of David Canepa... had already made up their minds. While the Board wanted to assure Millbrae residents it was listening to concerns, I don't think they really heard those folks.
Who's next?
That being said... we must embrace supportive housing as a good thing. However, the Board of Supervisors should not take state money and shoehorn housing into locations just because it is easy for them to do so.
Let's use available funding to create living spaces that look like homes instead of hotel rooms. Suitable acreage for such projects is at a premium, but that well may be the cost we must bear to provide homes. Perhaps a good first step would be city councils across the Peninsula to stop rubber-stamping commercial developments that include a fraction of the "affordable" housing needed in our county. "Affordable" housing that many homeless cannot afford.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.