Sue Lempert

James Coleman, in his news release proclaiming victory in a tight race where he defeated Mayor Richard Garbarino, 17-year member of the City Council, declared he was “the youngest, first openly queer, and first democratic socialist to get elected to the South San Francisco City Council.” Hard to believe this happened in South City, in north county, where there are no term limits and councilmembers serve for decades without fear of challenge.

But things are changing. Even though the expected blue wave didn’t happen nationally and in Orange County, California because the nation is more conservative than democrats anticipated and because moderates in swing congressional districts were falsely targeted as socialists or even worse for wanting to defund the police, this may not be the case on the Peninsula, now leading a blue progressive wave. District elections have made it easier for newcomers to win and harder for some incumbents to hang on. Karyl Matsumoto, one of the longest serving councilmembers on the South San Francisco council, will not seek re-election. Garbarino decided to go for it and came up short by several hundred votes.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(1) comment

BenToy

Good article and agree....that our municipalities’ leadership has been mostly elders who grew up in the 20th Century...and...managing our cities with old time metrics

We are almost 21 years into the 21st Century and we must stop casting into concrete 20th Century metrics

Not all age based, but their mentality or awareness of the change that MUST be in order to allow your young to live their own lives

I grew up both in San Mateo (Home and schooling) and South San Francisco (family store and worked there after school and weekends through college)

Painful to see how San Mateo Stuck in the 20th Century vs SSF’s mentality move forward into the 21st Century. Of course not an absolute, there are bits here and there, but the major changes has one city move forward at a greater pace and level than the other.

TOD and designated high density developments, Vision Zero application, understanding that we are returning to become a renters society, etc.

This was polar opposites at one time, but with the influx of younger minded council members and city’s upper management staff telling...of course IMHO based on my empirical data

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here