Sometimes it’s about a new development — a new retail project, a new office building, new housing.
Lately, it seems, it has been about race.
Sometimes it’s about a new development — a new retail project, a new office building, new housing.
Lately, it seems, it has been about race.
What it’s really all about is the status quo versus change.
Here’s a late-breaking bulletin: Change always wins. Maybe not right away, maybe after the status quo puts up a nasty right, but eventually and always.
This comes to mind in the wake of some pretty unsettling comments about Amourence Lee, the appointed member of the San Mateo City Council seeking election for the first time. She has not been shy about speaking out on race, as a representative, as someone who sought out an ethnically diverse neighborhood in which to live and as someone who is, indeed, a person of color.
Speaking out hardly makes her unique — city councilmembers up and down the Peninsula openly have supported the Black Lives Matter movement. Many councils have had long and intense and unusually frank discussions about the fuller nature of our communities and the practices, policies and social structures that are in place, officially and unofficially.
The main difference, it appears, is that Lee is up for election. The unsettling comments have neither been initiated by her opponents, Lisa Diaz Nash and incumbent Councilwoman Diane Papan, nor have the comments engendered any response by either of them. Maybe the debate among the three candidates will take the more customary form of honest disagreement over growth and development. Maybe the source of the comments is so widely known as a brash grouch that it’s not worth even the attention it has been given here.
But what strikes me most about this is the accusation that Lee has made race an issue. What we should have learned by now is that when it comes to America, race is always an issue.
PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE: For the fourth time, that fascinating public agency, the San Mateo County Harbor Commission has rejected a claim by soon-to-be-former Commissioner Sabrina Brennan that she is due all kinds of money because someone has harassed her in a manner uniquely evident to her.
If there are new boardmembers — including Brennan’s mom, Lemoine “Lee” Fernandez — elected to the commission, could we expect the new majority to vote in favor of giving her the money she is so desperately and consistently seeking? The word is that it could be in the range of six figures, and Brennan already has cost the district more than a $750,000 in investigating her various complaints and grievances against board members and district staff. No claim has been upheld.
That’s not the item, however. The item is a proposal from Brennan for a new policy regarding sexual harassment. The wording is such that if it had been in effect, she would have violated the policy in her now famous diatribe back in April in which she repeatedly shouted three words that won’t be repeated here, but were graphic references to female genitalia.
Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.
Editor's note: Two sections of this column, one referring to Kirsten Keith as hand-picked by Brennan, the other referring to her ballot designation as incorrect, were removed because of inaccuracies.
{{description}}
Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(11) comments
The comments that seem to be unsettling this fragile author in the posts he is referring to may be coming from me. At least that is my hope. Amourence Lee has made race and social equity her #1 issue in San Mateo and there are citizens in San Mateo that have a 1st Amendment right to make sure that this women is never elected to the city council. I, nor citizens who completely agree with me, have even begun to start our full on assault of removing this woman and all the SJW's and the BLM supporters who are a cancer to our city. I have been doxed, I have been called names and I have been threatened. Nothing in the lefts arsenal has been able to CANCEL me now going on four years. We now read this sad author go after comments he doesn't like and he is upset. Good thing Mark, you don't make the rules, the US Constitution does. Read it sometime. Let's all give Mr. Simon a lesson and vote for people who don't think race is always an issue in the United States like he does. Vote for Ms. Nash and Ms. Papan so that we can avoid having Ms. Lee in our city council and avoid the crime and violence we are seeing in many cities across America.
Christopher,
One thing sure sure, your Trumpian hypocrisy is your number one suit. You comment that the Constitution makes the rules yet you support a conman and his handlers that brake the rules and laws of this country at every chance they get. They speak of their righteous ways to their gullible followers while their actions speak of destroying the country for their profit and gain. Your rants about Amourence Lee will only help her solidify votes from fair minded people. Keep up the good work.
Conway: He probably is talking about you. Your insensitivity and refusal to recognize racism is a reality. You have created your own monster, so quit blaming others. Your constant bemoaning that San Mateo is less white than it used to be, and your distaste for people from other countries is as despicable as the man you worship. The fact is, not a lot of people agree with you. Sorry, snowflake.
Tommy, you are a bold faced liar. When did I ever bemoan the fact that San Mateo is less white than it used to be and when did I ever show a distaste for people from other countries. Can't beat me on the facts so you need to make lies up about me. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Conway--mire in your own words:
"San Mateo was 95% white in 1960, it is now 46%. That is all you have to know about the huge demographic change that happened in our city and the welcoming atmosphere long time residents have held out for foreigners from different countries and people of all races. This has got to stop."
Christopher,
You accuse Tommy of being a boldfaced liar on one hand and support Trump, a proven liar on the other hand. Even if Tommy were lying he would only be emulating your hero.
Tommy, you took me out of context. What has got to stop is the labeling of San Mateo as a racial city due to the facts that we have always been a welcoming community. I would call you a name right now but I will refrain.
Conway-I simply used your words. Perhaps you need to think about how you word things, so you can convey your point effectively.
Christopher,
Once again you complain about standard operating procedures of the Republican party. Take things out of context, make up stories and throw out data with no back up proof because they know their gullible followers will believe them anyway.
Odd, just went to Lee's website and top three issues are Housing, Quality of Life, and Environmental Sustainability. Sounds like the typical campaign to me, not sure where I see the change. I would hope Mr. Simon can arrange for the other candidates to have equal time on Pen TV.
For those informed citizens who just didn't go to the website now and have listened to Ms. Lee's rhetoric over the past year know what her true agenda is. Just listen to her own words and her history, don't take my word for it.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.