We are on the precipice of a new era of work. I know, I know. You’ve heard it before. But here we are, quite literally living in the post-knowledge economy. It is no longer what you know in a moment in time. It’s no longer about who has the highest SAT score (I’m very thankful for this one!) or who can amass the most information in their brains (although having conversations with people who are like this is quite an incredible experience). Today, it is about how fast you can learn, apply what you’ve learned, adapt, form cohesive ideas, tell compelling stories, work with others, and grow.
Do you remember that scene in Hidden Figures (if you haven’t seen this movie, please do yourself a favor and add it to the top of your to-do list) where the computers were concerned that the giant IBM brain machine being delivered to NASA was going to make their jobs obsolete?
In the film, the incredible Octavia Spencer playing Dorothy Vaughan says, “The IBM 7090 DPS. It has the capability of solving over 24,000 multiplications per second.”
Her message to her department? “(When it runs), you’re going to know how to program it. Unless you want to be out of a job?”
Overwhelmingly, her team responds with: NO. And so instead of computing, these amazing women adapt to become programmers of the computers that took their job.
Recommended for you
This question of relevancy has been occupying a space in humanity’s collective minds since the dawn of innovation. As Heraclitus said long ago, “Change is the only constant in life.” Of all the quotes that you can find on the vast internet, this one (and maybe the previously but not anymore Mark Twain attributed quote about the coldest winter experienced being a summer in San Francisco) rings the most true. Why do we think that this is any different for how we work?
Vaughan’s insight was spot on. The tactic — the manual computational work that this department had become known for — that was now replaceable. However, new specialties and jobs emerged along with the dawn of new technology. Vaughan saw the chance to create a wedge for her and her team and was ready to capture that opportunity when the time came. This cycle never stops.
I was at an AI Summit not too long ago with other investors and Silicon Valley executives, put together by an incredible organization called FirstBoard.io in collaboration with PwC. A lot of our conversations were around workforce concern of job loss or job displacement due to advancements in AI. The cultural zeitgeist moment of ChatGPT making generative AI accessible intersecting with GenAI actually being conversationally intelligent has created a literal tsunami of opportunity for productivity and efficiency improving applications sitting on top of GPT3/4, Bard, and their own large learning models. And this is just the beginning. But it’s not necessarily a bad thing.
I’ve been working in tech since 1997, with my first job building an intranet and other websites part time to help pay for tuition while at UC Berkeley. Since that time, we’ve gone through Web1, Web2, and sort of boomeranged to and back from Web3 to what some jokingly refer to as Web 2.5. Through it all, my job skills have had to dramatically evolve over time. I’ve made websites, did graphic design, was a journalist, a marketer, built customer success organizations, did sales, wrote a book, and today run operations and finance for a software company and advise startups. I don’t see it as reinvention, but adaptation. Even though I’m in spreadsheets and meetings a lot more today than I was in my 20s, the coding skills I picked up back then I still 100% use today. Just in a different way.
As AI seeps into more and more of how we work (if you don’t think you’re using AI today, you’re probably wrong. It’s been around for a long time, just marketed differently.), think about it as an opportunity rather than something to be fearful of. The fear of job loss can quickly become debilitating. However, the excitement that comes from seeing an opportunity to learn new skills, get creative, and shave off 25% of your “today work” so you can spend that time doing more high value things that only humans can do (for now) — now that’s a ride I want to get on.
Annie Tsai is chief operating officer at Interact (tryinteract.com), early stage investor and advisor with The House Fund (thehouse.fund), and a member of the San Mateo County Housing and Community Development Committee. Find Annie on Twitter @meannie.
Thanks for your column, Ms. Tsai, but I’d like to hear more about which jobs will be lost, and the impact. For instance, book and literature copyright holders might be worried since AI can easily digest their material and create new content based. We may be able to fire the majority of newspaper folks (except for investigative reporters). Sorry SM Daily Journal. Ultimately, though, AI isn’t going to do your laundry or wash your dishes, repair or maintain your car, house, garden, etc. Perhaps folks that went to trade school made the correct choice? I guess we’ll see what, if any valuable impact AI will have on our lives.
Annie - you are entirely correct. I entered the professional workforce now 50 years ago and have seen major changes in our systems to get the job done. Gone are the secretaries, recalcitrant phone systems, mail deliveries, triplicate forms, carbon paper, type writers, three martini lunches and many other fringes that we can apparently live without. Somehow, many functions disappeared but others took their place. Your illustration of the IBM computer system operators is quite relevant. One of my sons is now working in a field that did not exist when I started. He had the foresight not to dwell on his original college degree but switched to newly created opportunities. Yes, crafts people will still be needed but others in routine administrative and repetitive industrial positions need to be prepared for the changes that AI has already deemed ready for take over. Education and flexibility are now more important than ever.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
Thank you for this great opportunity to, well, see the opportunities!
Thanks for your column, Ms. Tsai, but I’d like to hear more about which jobs will be lost, and the impact. For instance, book and literature copyright holders might be worried since AI can easily digest their material and create new content based. We may be able to fire the majority of newspaper folks (except for investigative reporters). Sorry SM Daily Journal. Ultimately, though, AI isn’t going to do your laundry or wash your dishes, repair or maintain your car, house, garden, etc. Perhaps folks that went to trade school made the correct choice? I guess we’ll see what, if any valuable impact AI will have on our lives.
Annie - you are entirely correct. I entered the professional workforce now 50 years ago and have seen major changes in our systems to get the job done. Gone are the secretaries, recalcitrant phone systems, mail deliveries, triplicate forms, carbon paper, type writers, three martini lunches and many other fringes that we can apparently live without. Somehow, many functions disappeared but others took their place. Your illustration of the IBM computer system operators is quite relevant. One of my sons is now working in a field that did not exist when I started. He had the foresight not to dwell on his original college degree but switched to newly created opportunities. Yes, crafts people will still be needed but others in routine administrative and repetitive industrial positions need to be prepared for the changes that AI has already deemed ready for take over. Education and flexibility are now more important than ever.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.