Rep. Kevin Mullin, D-South San Francisco, has introduced new legislation that could make it easier for local cities to build affordable housing on land purchased by the Federal Highway Administration.
Currently, Mullin said, there’s an estimated 276,000 acres of unused government-owned land in transit-rich areas in the U.S., the majority of which is owned by the Federal Highway Administration. It’s difficult for local municipalities to repurpose that land for affordable housing because of current law, which stipulates properties purchased with federal funds must be sold for fair market price.
The bill Mullin has introduced, dubbed the Empty Lots to Housing Act, would remove that bureaucratic red tape and allow FHWA-owned properties to be transferred to local governments or nonprofit housing providers if 40% of the units are below market rate.
“This would be a way to make that more flexible and allow for the transfer of that property, to get the federal government out of the way and eliminate that federal barrier,” Mullin said.
The effort to streamline the lot conversion process was inspired by an unused area at the Colma BART station in San Mateo County, the area Mullin represents. The lot is managed by SamTrans but, because it was purchased with federal funds, the transition into building affordable housing has been difficult.
Bureaucratic challenges to building more affordable housing hit particularly hard in his district, Mullin said, where the cost-of-living crisis has made it extremely challenging for residents to afford rent.
“These challenges are particularly acute in high-cost areas like San Mateo County,” he said. “I’ve endeavored to connect my work in Washington with the needs of the district.”
Recommended for you
Affordable housing has long been a priority for Mullin, he said, and the issue was easier to address in more tangible ways when he served in the California State Assembly. Alongside his work on enhancing low-income housing tax credits, this bill serves as a way to make a practical difference in creating more housing.
“I was able to do more readily accessible things at the state level, with regard to direct legislation affecting housing,” Mullin said. “We’ve been searching for a way at the federal level to address this issue.”
He’s hopeful that the bill — which is co-sponsored by Republican and Democratic colleagues — can garner bipartisan support and even appeal to recent Republican and Trump administration-led efforts to cut through federal bureaucracy.
“The impulse there at the executive level is to try to eliminate bureaucracy and deal with federal red tape. This, I think, is a thoughtful example,” Mullin said “I’m going to be optimistic we can build out that coalition.”
In recent months, Congress and the federal government as a whole has been mired by infighting and anger around the Trump administration’s actions on issues from immigration to spending. Mullin said he is committed to fighting back against the Republican agenda and supporting pragmatic legislation that will help his constituents.
“I’m going to continually be looking for ways to move the housing conversation forward at the federal level and use any mechanism I can, because it’s such a crucial centerpiece issue for the San Francisco Peninsula,” he said.
It seems to me that if Mr. Mullin wants federal land to do anything, he’d better stop being, “committed to fighting back against the Republican agenda,” and instead be prepared to engage in the art of the deal with our great President Trump. Otherwise, don’t be surprised if the Feds tell the state to pound sand. Meanwhile, what about legislation that will make it easier to build affordable, or any housing, on state land? There is plenty of state land which could be better utilized, such as closing underpopulated schools and building housing or rezoning sections of state parks.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
It seems to me that if Mr. Mullin wants federal land to do anything, he’d better stop being, “committed to fighting back against the Republican agenda,” and instead be prepared to engage in the art of the deal with our great President Trump. Otherwise, don’t be surprised if the Feds tell the state to pound sand. Meanwhile, what about legislation that will make it easier to build affordable, or any housing, on state land? There is plenty of state land which could be better utilized, such as closing underpopulated schools and building housing or rezoning sections of state parks.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.