A popular South San Francisco car wash will be rebuilt into a expansive housing development under a decision by city officials seeking to revitalize a key corner of the city.
The South San Francisco City Council unanimously approved SummerHill Apartment Community’s proposal to build 172 apartments at 988 El Camino Real, home to South City Car Wash.
Despite acknowledging fears the development may compound existing traffic and parking issues in the area, councilmembers lauded the builder’s vision for the 1.67-acre site at the intersection of Chestnut Avenue, according to video of the Wednesday, Feb. 28, meeting.
“You are the right developer for that high-profile corner,” said Councilman Mark Addiego, recognizing a variety of other developments the builder has completed in South San Francisco.
Councilman Rich Garbarino was similarly laudatory to the builder, claiming he believes the development plan works well for the site.
“I like the design. It fits. It really does,” he said.
The developer is proposing a six-story building that would include units spanning in size between studios and two-bedroom units. The ground floor will include more than 10,900 square feet of commercial space, and a variety of surrounding amenities such as a lounge and fitness studio plus an outdoor recreational area adjacent to Centennial Way have been offered as well.
The property owner who has leased space to South City Car Wash, which has operated since 1958, said the decision to redevelop the land was made with great care.
“We believe we found the right developer for the property,” said property owner Fred Bravo.
The project will offer 259 parking spaces for residents and retail shoppers, generating concerns among some councilmembers regarding whether such an amount is adequate to accommodate the expected demand.
Other officials questioned the nature of the traffic flow patterns through the property, as there is limited access to the development from El Camino Real.
Wendy Sinclair-Smith, a resident critiquing the project, suggested shortcomings of it could create “a carmageddon,” or severe congestion issue further compounding the problems already existing in the area. To mitigate such concerns, she recommended the planners “go back to the drawing board to scale it down a bit.”
Recommended for you
Resident John Baker though presented an alternative view of the proposal, and suggested it offer fewer parking spaces in an effort to compel residents to use alternative forms of transportation. As it is currently designed, Baker said the project encourages patrons and residents to continue relying on their cars.
“Because they have the hope of parking, they will drive,” said Baker, who suggested some of the space reserved for parking would be better used for developing more housing units.
Developers hope to encourage public transportation ridership by offering $100 in introductory Clipper cards to residents, plus a $35 subsidy over three months to use carpool or bike sharing services.
Mayor Liza Normandy noted officials’ authority in altering the amount of parking spaces offered is limited, because the developer met the project’s zoning regulations.
But she too maintained reservations regarding the need for more spaces, and suggested officials could contribute to resolving the potential problem by building overflow parking at the nearby Civic Center project.
Adjacent to the car wash property, South San Francisco officials are planning to build new community and recreation centers, a library, fire station and police station. The development is expected to include new homes as well, though the size and scope of the residential component is yet to be determined.
The apartment builder also expressed a willingness to pay $1.83 million in park acquisition and construction fees to the city, plus a combined nearly $1 million in child care and school fees, plus more. An outdoor fitness park will be constructed near the BART station, available to the public, comprised of seven fitness stations which would be accessible from Centennial Way trail.
Councilman Pradeep Gupta said he believes the project will establish a nice synergy with the upcoming Civic Center when detailing his favorable vote.
“I support the project and I’m quite impressed by the clever solution to make use of that corner of South San Francisco,” he said.
(650) 344-5200 ext. 105

(7) comments
Congratulations SSF. Glad to see the new housing stock.
another big mistake by SSF! They are making the rich, even richer. Apartments milk people out of their money with no vested interest! The housing should be condo, where people at least own their own property/asset. Someone on the approval committee must be getting some kickback?
In disguise of needed housing, other quality of life issues are ignored by the so called representayivesof SSF. Once again the developers make their millions and the community is left to deal with the additional problems.
It's not 'in disguise' of anything, Cs. We need housing. This is housing. End of story. We still need thousands more units to make up the deficit, however.
So what is going to happen to South city Carwash??
Will any of this be affordable housing? At any rate, housing is definitely needed in the area.
A SSF city council member came by my house before the Lasl election and I asked where is the new grocery store and other nice places we could walk to and he ran away with out answering. Appartment buildings help wealthy kids collect more from the working families that really pay students loans. At least offer housing that we can invest in.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.