How Redwood City will protect its industrial zones, accommodate an influx of office workers and change with some $70 million in community benefits promised to the city by the Jay Paul Company were top of mind for Redwood City officials Monday as they reviewed the developer’s proposal to build a 1.2-million-square-foot office complex east of Highway 101 at the vacant site of the former Malibu Grand Prix.

The council voted 4-2, with Councilwoman Diane Howard absent, to initiate a study of the plan to build laboratories and offices at the 27-acre site east of Highway 101, which require an amendment to the city’s general plan designating the site for light industrial and port-related uses. It was the second time the plans, dubbed the Harbor View project, had come before city officials, following the Planning Commission’s rejection in November out of concerns about the project’s fit with the area’s existing zoning and density.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(6) comments

RWC_Resident

Yet another shining example that the wishes of developers take precedence over quality of life issues for the residents of Redwood City. Another embarrassing performance by Council and their orchestrated idea of a "study session" to distract from the heart of the resolution. Plain and simply, the resolution that passed started the process to amend the General Plan for the benefit of a developer. It's never too early to start the planning for yet another referendum to corral the majority of Council that is beholden to development.

RWC_Resident

AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN
In order to clear up any confusion as to what passed Monday night, I have included below the resolution's exact verbiage from the voting summary report. If there was any confusion or inconsistencies then someone should have asked for the resolution to be changed. Kudos to Councilmember Borgens for attempting to make sure everyone knew what they voting on before she was rudely cut-off by our Mayor. I have also included a link to a YouTube video of the meeting if anyone wants to relive the horror show. The starting points are at the end of this post and video commences with Council comment.
Bottom line: Aguirre, Gee, Masur and Seybert all voted to initiate the process for amending the General Plan to benefit a massive office project with impacts that can never be fully mitigated. These four Councilmembers have chosen the wishes of a developer over the best interests of the residents they are supposed to be representing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
VOTING SUMMARY REPORT
Recommendation:
If the City Council wishes to initiate the General Plan Amendment, it should adopt a Resolution to Initiate Proceedings to Amend the Redwood City
General Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 15612 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO AMEND THE STRATEGIC GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AS REQUESTED BY THE JAY PAUL
COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE HARBOR VIEW PLACE PROJECT
M/S Aguirre/Gee to initiate the General Plan Amendment, it should adopt a Resolution to Initiate Proceedings to Amend the Redwood City General Plan. Motion carried 4-2 by roll call vote with Vice Mayor Bain and Council Member Borgens opposed.

Julie Pardini

Kris Johnson's account of the events of this council meeting are absolute truth.

Cindy Cornell

More and more jobs and no complementary housing.

Julie Pardini

This comment by Kris Johnson is the absolute truth. The Council Meeting on Monday evening was very hard to watch. The residents of Redwood City deserve better. Thank goodness for the honest and straightforward comments made by Vice Mayor Ian Bain and Councilwoman Janet Borgens. The comments we heard by the other members of the council were misleading at best.

Julie Pardini

"Mayor John Seybert also supported moving forward with further study of the project."
He said (the plan)..."should be open to revisions in case officials got certain aspects of it wrong."

(Deja vu: Where have I heard that "in case we get it wrong" statement before?)

"“I think it’s an opportunity to do our homework one more time,” he said.

(I would suggest TWO more times.)

Better to do your homework BEFORE the construction. How can you "make revisions" to a completed 8-story building, once built?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here