An update on Half Moon Bay’s rental registration program quickly turned into a conversation around revisiting the city’s recently-passed rent control ordinance at the City Council’s meeting April 1.
The rental registration program, implemented February 2024, requires landlords to register all rental properties and pay a $75 fee. The program currently has a 79% compliance rate, with the city beginning the process of issuing citations for noncompliant landlords in January, staff said.
It was seen as an important step toward managing rent control in the city, which passed by a 4-1 vote in May 2024 and requires a maximum annual rent adjustment to the lesser of 3% or an 80% cap in changes to the Consumer Price Index, which continually adjusts and is linked to the price of common goods.
Councilmember Debbie Ruddock, who was the sole dissenting vote on the rent control ordinance, broached the idea of revisiting the topic as a whole.
“Frankly, I’m on the side of revisiting the whole conversation around rent stabilization,” she said. “I think there’s some good intentions … but I think having looked very closely at it, I don’t think it’s the right solution for our community.”
Community Development Director Mike Noche said that staff had been inundated with questions during the implementation period of rental registration, fielding a variety of concerns from landlords and property owners.
One community member, Nancy Fontana, emphasized that point during public comment. The program as a whole gives tenants too much power, she said, and ignores the difficulties mom-and-pop landlords face.
Recommended for you
“I can’t stand this program. I think it sends the wrong message,” she said. “People that are making homes for people and renting to people, this is insulting to them. It tells citizens they are bad people.”
The prospect of rent control and the rental registration program may be incentivizing coastside property owners currently renting out homes to sell those properties, Councilmember Patric Bo Jonsson said.
“I had a lot of people calling me prior to being on council that have rentals basically saying they’re just going to sell their house now, they don’t want to deal with this across the board,” he said. “The data we’re getting is good, but I don’t know if I want to see it continue on, and I’d like to revisit this whole thing.”
So far, the city has identified 1,300 suspected rentals within city limits, with 1,048 registered. Three-hundred-and-seventy of those units are suspected to fall within rent stabilization policies, Noche said.
Mayor Robert Brownstone and Councilmember Deborah Penrose — who was not present during the April 1 meeting — are the only members of the current City Council to have voted in favor of rent control. Bo Jonsson and Councilmember Paul Nagengast, who also expressed trepidation about the program, were not on council at the time of the original vote.
“We’ll talk about why we decided to have rent stabilization,” Brownstone said. “We brought up the issues that a lot of workforce folks can’t afford to live here — so what do you do in between the time they can’t afford to live here and we’re trying to build housing?”
This smacks of the overpowering influence of the California Apartment Owners Association on any and all efforts to stabilize rents for working people. They have been bad actors in the past as evidenced in Pacifica a few years ago. They will never give up on the drive to increase rents at the cost of communities and middle and lower income people. They've never seen a regulation they like.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
This smacks of the overpowering influence of the California Apartment Owners Association on any and all efforts to stabilize rents for working people. They have been bad actors in the past as evidenced in Pacifica a few years ago. They will never give up on the drive to increase rents at the cost of communities and middle and lower income people. They've never seen a regulation they like.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.