Cars back up on 25th Avenue at Delaware Street in San Mateo as a train crosses. Officials are working on a plan to separate the grades so traffic can travel under the tracks.
There are 42 at-grade crossings along the entire Caltrain corridor and a variety of proposed improvements for those crossings, including grade separations, could cost up to $11.1 billion, according to the transit agency.
A grade separation is when the tracks are separated from the road and such a project improves safety and helps reduce traffic congestion because cars, bicycles and pedestrians no longer have to stop and wait for passing trains.
At a meeting May 2, Caltrain’s board of directors will likely chart a path forward for improving those 42 at-grade crossings.
Grade separations are only legally required on four-track segments — Caltrain is currently a two-segment corridor — or when maximum train speeds exceed 125 mph, but interest in grade separation goes “significantly” beyond current requirements, according to a staff report.
The board will be asked to choose from three investment plans for improving the 42 at-grade crossings, including low, medium and high intensity investment options.
The price tag for each option varies based on the degree to which Caltrain grows in the coming decades. Assuming the railroad sees what’s referred to as “baseline growth” — changes that are already in the works, including electrification — then it would cost $8.5 billion to improve the 42 at-grade crossings. That money would cover the cost of 24 grade separations, 14 four-quadrant gates, which are the barriers that keep motorists in place when trains pass, and three mitigated closures, which are road closures with separated bike and pedestrian access, according to the report.
Grade separations typically cost between $255 million and $355 million a pop, mitigated closures are in the range of $35 million while quad gates and other safety improvements cost about $1 million, according to the report.
If the board members chooses the high intensity funding option, then it would cost $9 billion to improve at-grade crossings corridorwide assuming “baseline growth.”
But board members could decide that Caltrain needs to grow much more than the baseline scenario, which entails 10 trains per hour. In August, board members will decide if Caltrain should grow to 12 trains per hour or as many as 16 trains per hour in the coming decades and, if those scenarios are selected, then the cost of improving the 42 at-grade crossings could be as high as $11.1 billion, according to the report.
Recommended for you
On a typical weekday, 400,000 motorists drive through Caltrain’s grade crossings, equivalent to the combined traffic volumes of the Bay and San Mateo bridges, according to the report. And between 2008 and 2018, more than 80 collisions have occurred at Caltrain’s grade crossings, 30 of which involved a fatality.
Today, 71 of 113 crossings along the Caltrain corridor have been separated and an additional grade crossing in San Mateo is being constructed. Expected to cost $180 million, that project is aimed for completion by 2021.
Redwood City is currently studying each of its at-grade crossings. Officials are especially interested in a grade separation at Whipple Avenue and have said in the past that such a project would cost between $300 million and $1 billion depending on its scope.
In Burlingame, environmental and design work is underway for a grade separation on Broadway, but funding has yet to be identified for the project estimated to cost $250 million in 2017.
Of the 42 remaining at-grade crossings, 30 are located in San Mateo County, 10 are in Santa Clara County and two are in San Francisco. There are an additional 28 at-grade crossings on the Union Pacific-owned corridor south of Tamien.
Grade separation projects are typically funded through a variety of sources, including contributions from the city in which the crossing is located. The San Mateo County Transportation Authority, which oversees the county’s sales tax revenue earmarked for transportation improvements, has a lockbox for grade separation projects and state and federal grants are also often relied upon.
@hikertom, you are forgetting the very high costs of delaying electrification and the concomitant system & service & capacity upgrade to Peninsula residents, their mobility, quality of life and to the Peninsula & Silicon Valley's economic viability and business climate.
Of course, rearranging (and/or grade-separating) electrified track can be (and is!) done all over the world (where electrified trains are the norm) all the time at a small marginal extra cost that amounts to a rounding error in the overall project costs.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Wouldn't it be more cost effective to do the grade separation before electrification is completed?
@hikertom, you are forgetting the very high costs of delaying electrification and the concomitant system & service & capacity upgrade to Peninsula residents, their mobility, quality of life and to the Peninsula & Silicon Valley's economic viability and business climate.
Of course, rearranging (and/or grade-separating) electrified track can be (and is!) done all over the world (where electrified trains are the norm) all the time at a small marginal extra cost that amounts to a rounding error in the overall project costs.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.