The formal inauguration of Caltrain’s groundbreaking electric train — the first of its kind in California — took place Saturday morning in San Francisco.
The event featured appearances from a bevy of politicians and other dignitaries who touted the project as a sign of renewed hope for modern trains and a forerunner to other such undertakings elsewhere.
The event started with a long lineup of short speeches — including by House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, Gov. Gavin Newsom and San Francisco Mayor London Breed — followed by a train ride to Millbrae and back, exclusive to the government, business and labor officials in attendance, along with the media.
“We’re looking forward to having these trains move and groove, but you won’t know it because they’ll be so quiet,” Breed said.
Caltrain, which broke ground on the $2.4 billion project in 2017, will phase in the electric trains among the existing diesel ones between now and Sept. 21, after which its fleet is expected to be entirely electric. Sunday is the first day the new trains will be used for public ridership.
Local officials described the project as a long-developing dream that finally materialized through staggering levels of interagency cooperation, the pooling of various funding sources and the circuitous navigation of a thorny political landscape.

House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, top left, and Gov. Gavin Newsom, top right, cut the red ribbon Saturday with Caltrain leadership, federal and state elected officials on hand at the San Francisco Train Station.
“This is the spirit of California, and that spirit has alarmed the world,” Newsom said jokingly.
He said the trains would “set the model for the future of all rail across the country — and when electric is the norm we will probably say: ‘It all started here in San Francisco.’”
According to Caltrain spokesperson Dan Lieberman, the new trains will cut carbon dioxide emissions by 250,000 metric tons annually — the equivalent of removing 55,000 cars from the road. He said other benefits include faster service (the electric trains accelerate and decelerate much more quickly), less noisiness, smoother rides and a host of new onboard amenities.
“There’s Wi-Fi, plugs under every forward-facing seat, security cameras, digital displays, improved climate controls and redesigned accessible bathrooms,” Lieberman said.
The Caltrain electrification project combines funding from numerous sources at all levels of government — including over $2 billion combined from the federal and state governments, and about $250 million from local ballot measures, bridge toll funds, and contributions from the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara.
“We had a lot of leadership on the federal, state and local level trying to get funding and get over the various political hurdles,” Lieberman said.
Speakers at Saturday’s event said Caltrain’s electric railway is both a triumph in itself and a boost to California’s own troubled plan to build high-speed rail from San Francisco to Los Angeles — a project that ties in with Caltrain’s electrification endeavor in some important ways.

The view from the driver compartment Saturday on the inaugural run of Caltrain’s new electric train service.
The state’s original high-speed rail plan, which had its funding approved by voters back in 2008, called for building new tracks along the entire rail line. That plan was later scrapped amid lawsuits from various cities on the Peninsula that objected to the construction.
It was replaced with a new plan that would share Caltrain’s existing tracks, and then route the train through the Central Valley after the end of the Caltrain line in Gilroy (though Union Pacific, not Caltrain, owns the tracks between San Jose and Gilroy).
“They wanted to tear up the Peninsula and the cities were all suing — it was a prairie fire,” said U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, as she hobnobbed with constant interlocutors during the train’s 30-minute inaugural ride. “So we came up with the idea that the high-speed rail on the Peninsula would be the Caltrain rail.”
The new plan — and the federal funding its advocates secured — gave new life to California’s project, Eshoo said. It also helped bring in both state and federal funding for Caltrain’s project because the success of that undertaking became critical to the high-speed rail plan.
“High-speed rail has helped us get the funding for Caltrain because eventually they’ll be running on the same tracks,” Lieberman said.
California’s plans aside, Lieberman stressed that Caltrain’s achievement was already monumental. He added that he expects Caltrain ridership levels to rebound after years of low numbers since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The choice between the gridlock of [U.S. Highway] 101 and riding on a beautiful, modern train — that’s not even a choice,” he said.
(7) comments
First of its kind? Is he kidding? The looks and the technology of these trains resemble those that were common 30 years ago in Europe. Have any of these leaders ever travelled on trains outside California? And, as was brought up before, the station platforms are too low and it will require special ramps for disabled folks to even enter these vintage trains. That is provincial California for you, after billions of dollars.
Rosenheim wrote, "the first of its kind in California." "Vintage trains?" Wait till you board one!
“This is a diesel to electric conversion — the first project of its kind in a generation in North America,” [Lieberman] said. “It’s happened before, but I think it was back in like the 80s. Actually, more recently than that. "In 2000, Amtrak completed a massive 156-mile electrification project between New Haven, Conn., and Boston, which allowed its high-speed Acela Express and other electric trains to run the entire length of the Boston-Washington Northeast Corridor."
https://www.trains.com/trn/railroads/history/all-wired-up-the-history-behind-the-electrification-of-railroads/
Aha Irvin - thanks for the link. They must have thought that they reinvented the wheel with this electrification. I am in favor of this conversion but it appears to be 100 years late and billions of dollars short. I used to work for a large national energy company. Back in 1998 we made an unsolicited offer to CalTrain/SamTrans to finance, build and then turn operations over to an authority of their choosing. We estimated that we could build and deliver an operational a system within 5 years at a fraction of the cost that CalTrain is now boasting about. We never heard back.
Finally, after 25 years, we have a system that went over budget and will use dated technology. That is the price to pay for leaving it to the amateurs and labor union interests in these transit districts.
Says "first of its kind..." Isn't BART electric, much less the old Key System"?
BART was built as an electric train. The article speaks of 'conversions' from diesel to electric. In fact, when diesel trains were first introduced, the conversions were just the opposite – from electric to diesel (or diesel-electric). This Trains article from March includes passenger rail, but focuses on freight: " "Electrification of railroads: Dieselization dooms electrics...In the decade after World War II, seven systems were shut down, victims of diesels, aging electrical equipment, and changing traffic patterns. Some extensions to electric commuter lines occurred, but by 1981 the plug had even been pulled on Conrail’s ex-PRR freight-only lines."
https://www.trains.com/trn/railroads/history/all-wired-up-the-history-behind-the-electrification-of-railroads/
The notion that this project is about anything but high speed rail is misguided at the least. Absent that pipe-dream project (which I believe will never connect anything to anything - not in any of our lifetimes or without completely bankrupting us), changing what makes this non-productive system run is of little consequence, except to the taxpayers. Calling the use of federal funds to pay for this project (or state or local "funds" rather than "taxpayer funds" is a way to try to hide that each and everyone of us is paying for all this hype. Speeding up the trains and adding frequency before the grade separations are all done, is backwards to say the least. If we are going to get Trump back, at least he is likely to end this project. Like a stopped clock, he might be right once or twice a day.
thanks for clarification
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.