Editor,

I’ve written email comments to the Belmont City Council, including the future of the Belmont open-space trails, and only one member ever responds. Warren Lieberman. That’s why I will vote for Lieberman for Belmont mayor — he’s the only candidate who expresses interest in residents, while his opponent Julia Mates is endorsed by outside special interest groups and party politicians.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Paul Sheng

I find the claim that only Warren Lieberman is the only council member that ever responds to this person’s email comments to CIty Council to be highly implausible. I have emailed City Council on several occasions and I have always received a response from all five councilmembers: Mates, Lieberman, McCune, Stone, and Hurt. I’m grateful to live in a city where all of our council members are equally responsive to residents.

The claim that Lieberman is the only candidate that expresses interest in residents is absurd. Watch the Chamber San Mateo Candidates Forum yourself (it’s an hour, but you can watch their opening statement in the first five minutes here: https://us02web.zoom.us/rec/play/s4-gbZ7sbUiZeElP9J1i8UhvyDX1W0BhZkVjlsefuxdbSMxO8y5H5X4peOCCJfeL86gaAyx3_9bVDDXL.pOhittUxuKJpQbwl

If you watch the video, it’s clear that Julia Mates is laser-focused on the interests of Belmont residents, and unlike Lieberman, she has innovative ideas to make life better for residents while preserving the character of our city. Unlike Lieberman, she has a detailed, expert-driven and compromise-driven plan to improve our open space trails and make them safe for everyone, which include trail features to slow bicycle traffic and increase safety for hikers. (Fast-forward to 23:23 to see the candidates speak on open space.)

Also, unlike Lieberman, Mates is not disqualified from negotiating with Stanford on their pending purchase of NDNU and plan to develop 700,000 s.f. Worth of facilities. Because Lieberman has a conflict of interest, if he becomes mayor, we’ll have an absentee mayor every step of the way, and our city will be at a significant disadvantage.

When it comes to endorsements, both candidates are endorsed by “party politicians” Jackie Spier and Jerry Hill. Where they differ is Mates is endorsed by the entire current CIty Council (except for Lieberman), 5 out of 7 current Belmont Parks and Rec Commissioners, 5 out of 7 current Belmont Planning Commissioners, and our current County Supervisor Carole Groom. It’s clear who our local leaders trust and who they see as the future of Belmont. Lieberman is beholden to Belmont’s “old guard,” as shown by his endorsements from former mayors/councilmembers, some of whom have been out of office for decades.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here