Regarding the weekend article, “$76 Billion Windfall-California is awash in tax revenue and budget reflects it,” normal discussions about budgets would include discussions about a rainy day reserve and how to pay down debt, not just profligate spending.
California’s unfunded public pension liabilities are estimated to be in the hundreds of billions of dollars and annual payments to CalPERS and CalSTRs are bankrupting local municipalities and school districts. Poor investment returns and overly optimistic investment returns are exacerbating the problem.
How about some more balanced reporting about this issue. It should be the elephant in the room. Time to get real. Newsom needs to start watching Suze Orman.
Mr. Ostrander, it’s not in California’s interest (pun intended) to disclose that type of information. Just look at the bright side, it’s only the kids and the following generations that will pay an ever higher price for CAs profligacy. Suze Orman would be able to tell you that price. Newsom couldn’t, or doesn’t want to.
As long as we have one party Democrat government, pension costs will expand faster than anything else in the CA budget. When Democrat politicians negotiate with government unions, there is no-one at the bargaining table to represent the people.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Mr. Ostrander, it’s not in California’s interest (pun intended) to disclose that type of information. Just look at the bright side, it’s only the kids and the following generations that will pay an ever higher price for CAs profligacy. Suze Orman would be able to tell you that price. Newsom couldn’t, or doesn’t want to.
As long as we have one party Democrat government, pension costs will expand faster than anything else in the CA budget. When Democrat politicians negotiate with government unions, there is no-one at the bargaining table to represent the people.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.