Editor,
California’s proposed caste legislation Senate Bill 403 effectively targets Hindus. The bill describes, as its targets, certain “communities of religious practice” and confesses that it targets the South Asian diaspora.
Editor,
California’s proposed caste legislation Senate Bill 403 effectively targets Hindus. The bill describes, as its targets, certain “communities of religious practice” and confesses that it targets the South Asian diaspora.
Everyone has a race, color and ancestry, but not everyone has a “caste.” Every child is taught in middle school that “caste” is a Hindu practice. Regardless of SB 403’s wording or its intent, Americans erroneously associate “caste” with Hindus.
California’s Alien Land Laws of 1913 targeted Japanese, Chinese and South Asians from owning land. Now some 110 years later, the new state senator from Fremont, Aisha Wahab, has proposed a law specifically targeting South Asians.
The bill’s intent is questioned by Dean Vikram Amar of the University of Illinois College of Law: “The thinness of the clarification motive for the law’s enactment opens the door to the possibility that the bill is intended to target and condemn particular communities with whom the word “caste” is deeply and stereotypically associated.”
SB 403 is insultingly duplicative, and targets, stereotypes and denigrates South Asians.
On a personal note, my son could not answer “what is your caste?” despite living in a Hindu home and community for the past 35+ years. Yet, he is carrying a liability of presumption of guilt based on a conformational bias; as happened with two Cisco employees who are now acquitted after years of harassment.
Why will I not be concerned when California is making laws that will stereotype my great-grandchildren as potentially casteists?
SB 403 is discriminatory and unconstitutional. I oppose SB 403.
Dilip Amin
Burlingame
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(6) comments
Per NBC News on May 11, "Sen. Aisha Wahab’s bill, SB 403, flew through the Senate in a 34-1 vote."
Mr. Amin - I don't understand the provisions of this bill and I surmise most of us don't. It would be helpful to elaborate on your opposition. The inner-relationships among the plethora of Indian ethnic groups are not very well known among many Americans who are not of Indian-decent. Other demographics seem to get all of the attention so it is likely long overdue to publicize your relevant issues.
Dirk van Ulden (above) raised an excellent point that most Americans (including Hindu-Americans from India and my children), don't understand this caste bill.
We all are erroneously taught in 6th grade that CASTE = HINDUS. Furthermore, we all agree that it is good to stop any kind of discrimination, including for caste. Why then am I against the bill as is?
SB 403, even effectively targeting Hindus, there is no mention of the word "Hindu" in the bill. Actually the bill mentions all people of color (Asians, South Americans and Africaners) except Whites and Middle East people. ***This is deception***. Either Senator Wahab 1) adds "Hindu" in the bill or 2) removes the "Caste" word from the bill; since in Americans' mind, CASTE = HINDUs. Senator Wahab, be honest!
Making laws that are not facially neutral is unconstitutional. Would you support a bill that targets Mexicans as XXXX and African-Americans as YYYY, even if that is universally accepted? Why would I tolerate a bill potentially targeting my great grandchildren as CASTEISTs?
It is very hard to be a Hindu in America. Dirk, I hope you will take time to understand my pain.
Dilip - I have several neighbors who are immigrants from India. It seems that they are not comfortable talking about this caste system with the uninitiated. In fact most of my neighbors, including ourselves, are immigrants from all over the world. Most are not willing or even interested in discussing the inherent issues of their native countries. Being from the Netherlands, most people associate that country with tulips, windmills and drugs. How to even explain that there are 17 million Dutchmen who have nothing or little to do with such attributes? My understanding of the cast system is based on a social order and categories that exist in other cultures as well. Most immigrants come here to escape from that needless and useless burden but apparently not all are willing to give that up. Churchill had an American mother. He has said that the beauty of this country is that we have the opportunity to unload all of the restrictions that come with traditions but can keep the ones that are constructive. Apparently, not every immigrant realizes the freedom that coming here can provide.
Dear Dirk, I am not saying at all that Caste was not and is not an issue in India. The same way, Sunni-Shia-Ahmadi-Ismaili and Dutch as you mentioned have potential discrimination potential in America. I have spent my first 26 years in India and have NEVER come across a caste issue. Rest of my 45 years in American corporate life, again, I never ever saw a hint of caste issues. There is not a single convicted caste discrimination case in entire American history. Why is there an urgency to make laws against Hindus now? If California wishes to make preventive laws, make it against all. Alternatively, remove the word ‘CASTE’ and make the law facially neutral. Today, 38% of Hindus marry interfaith in America. Our second generation are almost part of this melting pot, America, and have least to do with systems in their parent’s home country. In spite of all these, SB 403 could bring lawsuits on any innocent Hindu manager, like it happened in the case of CISCO (read www.CasteGate.org). There are ancestry based current laws to cover if there is any caste related issue, like happened in CISCO. We do not need a new law now. I feel the ***bill’s intentions are bad*** and most Americans blindly support it because they are against 'discrimination'; without realizing that SB 403 ITSELF IS DISCRIMINATORY to start with. I wish SB 403 gets revised.
SB 403 is very confusing, even for those who tried to read a little more on it. To clarify my views, I have prepared this 4 min video, I hope you will view and comment on it https://youtu.be/A3lgyysF5v8.
Also read these articles: @@1@@ Dean and Professor of Law https://verdict.justia.com/2023/05/16/preliminary-thoughts-on-potential-constitutional-flaws-in-sb-403-a-california-proposal-to-prohibit-caste-discrimination @@2@@ Barbara McGraw https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/04/20/opinion-caste-bill-would-harm-californias-south-asian-communities/ @@3@@ Hindu American Foundation https://www.hinduamerican.org/say-no-to-sb403 @@4@@ CISCO case https://castegate.org @@5@@ My concerns https://indiawest.com/caste-cal-state-versus-my-great-grandchildren/ . California, if you are not 100% sure about it, pause the bill SB 403. It is wrong to target helpless new immigrant minorities.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.