In “Today in history — June 27, 2022,” The Associated Press highlights the U.S. Supreme Court’s defense of abortion rights in 2016.
Since then, the court has been packed with mean-spirited members intent on creating chaos and incalculable misery by a renegade president who gloats and rejoices over the court’s recent decision. They are just politicians in robes. The six members responsible have engendered widespread contempt, perhaps they may be forced to resign under considerable public pressure.
In our form of government, appointed and elected officers are supposed to “serve with the consent of the governed.” They do not have our consent to create chaos and misery.
“Rule” has a very negative connotation — government officials get into office to manipulate people’s lives.
Dear Mr/Mrs Habeeb - these are not mean-spirited judges but experts in their respective judicial fields. They merely undid what prior colleagues managed to pull of that was inconsistent with the Constitution. The only way to remove them is through impeachment but, pray tell me, what would be the grounds for that measure? Finally doing what the Founding Fathers had in mind for this Country, instead of coming up with twisted interpretations?
Dirk: No matter how creatively you twist the US Constitution around, where do you find anything about women not allowed to control their own body? That’s just a sick fantasy by men who feel insecure about women and who may not have been very successful, and instead resorting to force, like this Kavanaugh character.
Dirk: And why should there be? Both by default and pure logic, women should be in charge of their own body! You don't find anything about how to wash ourselves, either, yet we do so without any directives from the SCOTUS!
Hmm... "Where do you find anything in the Constitution anything about women specifically being allowed to control their own body?" Does that apply everywhere? Can the government now force/prevent, say, vaccinations? Blood donations? It's another place where a document written 234 years ago by a privileged class needs to be made easier to amend.
Dirk: You don't find anything in the US Constitution about women being allowed to drive cars either, or fly airplanes, or go skiing without a male escort, for that matter!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(7) comments
Dear Mr/Mrs Habeeb - these are not mean-spirited judges but experts in their respective judicial fields. They merely undid what prior colleagues managed to pull of that was inconsistent with the Constitution. The only way to remove them is through impeachment but, pray tell me, what would be the grounds for that measure? Finally doing what the Founding Fathers had in mind for this Country, instead of coming up with twisted interpretations?
Dirk: No matter how creatively you twist the US Constitution around, where do you find anything about women not allowed to control their own body? That’s just a sick fantasy by men who feel insecure about women and who may not have been very successful, and instead resorting to force, like this Kavanaugh character.
And Jorg, where do you find anything in the Constitution anything about women specifically being allowed to control their own body?
Dirk: And why should there be? Both by default and pure logic, women should be in charge of their own body! You don't find anything about how to wash ourselves, either, yet we do so without any directives from the SCOTUS!
Hmm... "Where do you find anything in the Constitution anything about women specifically being allowed to control their own body?" Does that apply everywhere? Can the government now force/prevent, say, vaccinations? Blood donations? It's another place where a document written 234 years ago by a privileged class needs to be made easier to amend.
Dirk: You don't find anything in the US Constitution about women being allowed to drive cars either, or fly airplanes, or go skiing without a male escort, for that matter!
Have you ever read our Constitution our have any idea of what it really says???
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.