On Monday evening, the Redwood City Council welcomed a few new members to its ranks. As I watched the online swearing-in, I found myself wondering how the two truly new members — Michael Smith and Lissette Espinoza-Garnica — might affect future council directions (the two other members sworn in that night — Alicia Aguirre and Jeff Gee — are less of a mystery given their past council experience). That led to thoughts about past councils, their campaigns and their actions as councilmembers. From there my thoughts turned to memories of various candidates campaigning on a platform of “pausing” large-scale development in Redwood City.
Having seen no evidence that the pace of development ever really slowed, I decided to try backing my suspicions up with hard data. Starting from a list of about 100 significant development projects proposed over the last decade, I identified 53 in which new buildings received city approval. Using their approval dates, I then aggregated them into five two-year buckets — buckets that are separated by City Council elections.
City Council terms are four years long, but every two years roughly half of the seven seats come up for a vote. Thus, each two-year period corresponds to a different set of councilmembers, plus a new mayor. While I chose buckets that correspond to differing councils, I must stress that many projects are approved by those other than the council; lesser projects may be approved by the city zoning administrator or the Planning Commission, rather than the council itself. But being the only elected body among the three, the City Council sets the tone. Thus, if a pause had been instituted, I would expect to see it reflected at all levels.
Also, note that while the council sets the tone, within the councilmembers are essentially equal. While each two-year term has an associated mayor, that mayor is no different from any other councilmember when it comes to considering project approvals.
According to my data, during the first period — from November 2009 until November 2011, when Jeff Ira was mayor — five projects were approved, including the One Marina condominium development and the new Kaiser hospital building. Alicia Aguirre then took the gavel for the next two years. During her term, the council the city approved eight projects, including Indigo (463 apartments) and the Crossing/900 (“Box”) buildings.
Recommended for you
From December 2013 to December 2015 Redwood City’s mayor was Jeff Gee. The number of approvals continued their increase during his term, to a total of 12. Among them were two Greystar projects, the eight-story office building at the corner of Marshall Street and Middlefield Road, and the enormous Blu Harbor project.
The largest number of project approvals — 15 — occurred during the two-year period beginning in December 2015, when John Seybert was mayor. These included some really significant projects, such as the Stanford nonmedical campus on Broadway; the eight-story, 350-unit apartment building being built on El Camino Real; the Arroyo Green senior housing project on Bradford Street; and the “Chan Zuckerberg” building at the corner of Jefferson Avenue and Broadway. If ever there was to be a pause, most expected it to come over the following two years, when Ian Bain chaired the council. Although the number of projects approved between December 2017 and December 2019 was indeed fewer than during the two prior years, it only dropped to 11, nearly matching the total during Jeff Gee’s term. Projects approved during this period included the large mixed-use Broadway Plaza project, the 131-unit townhouse project underway next to the former Docktown Marina, and the 125-unit affordable apartment building now under construction at 353 Main St.
One year into her two-year mayoral stint, Diane Howard’s term has so far proven to be the quietest, with only two major project approvals. However, one of those was for the massive South Main Mixed-Use project. And since Mayor Howard has taken up the gavel, the council initiated six major projects as part of its Gatekeeper Process, projects that will likely come up for approval in the next year or two. As well, early in her term, the council initiated the community visioning process for the city’s new transit district, which undoubtedly will include a significant redevelopment of the Sequoia Station shopping center, and thus will add to the already packed slate of upcoming projects.
Although the number of project approvals peaked between December 2015 and December 2017, one would be pressed to claim that what followed was anything like a pause. I began writing about Redwood City in 2013, when some 13 major development projects were actively underway in Redwood City, and have watched an additional 40 be approved since then. Given the number of projects currently in line for possible approval, I see no signs of a development pause in Redwood City’s future. Clearly, our new councilmembers have their work cut out for them.
Greg Wilson is the creator of Walking Redwood City, a blog inspired by his walks throughout Redwood City and adjacent communities. He can be reached at greg@walkingRedwoodCity.com.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.