The book on 2017 is firmly closed and we are fully immersed in New Year’s greetings for at least another few weeks. While many suggest 2017 was unpredictable, I will try my best to make a few predictions for 2018.
First, a bit of non-news that became news: U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier will not be running for governor, though the rumor that she might certainly caused a stir this holiday weekend. Speier let it be known she was not running this week, butonly after a few days of the rumor simmering across the political world. Traveling across the country to D.C. is a grind, and Speier has lots of experience in state government, but a run for governor will not be. Had she entered the race, it would have made it more interesting. But it also would cause a tremendous jostling for positions among the county’s political family for her congressional seat, which she would have to vacate to run.
Next, what will continue: New construction will remain, however, I had predicted 2017 would see a slowdown. There just seems to be money to be made still and an appetite for new buildings — at least by developers. I foresee a further move toward housing instead of offices because there is a growing realization that the primary factor in the jobs/housing imbalance is that there are too many jobs being created and not enough housing. But there seems to be growing consternation about the amount of any new development and its cumulative impact.
Case in point is the Passage at San Mateo development proposal at the corner of South Delaware Street and Concar Drive just north of State Route 92. The 935-unit housing development with retail fits into the city’s rail corridor plan passed years ago, but is definitely pressing all the buttons for neighborhood opposition considering the amount of construction the area has recently seen.
My prediction is that this proposal will have a difficult public planning process that will have to be managed well by both the city and the developer. The Bay Meadows specific plan and the citizens advisory committee that formed to facilitate both it and the rail corridor plan was a yearslong process and although one could argue the heavy lifting on changing the area’s zoning was already done, it’s been a while and new outreach and community input may be required. It seems to be a microcosm of the existential crisis this area is feeling as it contends with growth, changing character and the rising need for housing for new residents and the conflicts that arise amid it all.
The rising cost of living and doing business in this area will also be a factor as middle-class residents feel the pinch and consider leaving. Look for more mom-and-pop businesses to also call it quits as the cost of doing business rises in this area. Whether that is good or bad is up to you, but don’t be surprised when seemingly successful businesses that provide essential services decide it just doesn’t pencil out anymore because of the rising costs of doing business and new government mandates.
Recommended for you
Transportation will be another hot topic, as it was this year, but look for local transit officials to really lay it on thick about the need for a new sales tax to fund improvements though those specific improvements have yet to be identified.
Belmont Councilman Charles Stone was just named chair of SamTrans so look for him to talk about “disrupting traffic congestion” several thousand times this year as this is a phrase he delights in employing. It has been floated that Stone is laying the groundwork for a future run for the Board of Supervisors so this new position provides him some prominence. Let’s hope SamTrans figures out some specifics before asking for money, however. I predict they will.
I also predict that as more elected officials take to social media, which is perfect for their ego and need to expound and exhibit, the feedback loop will move them more to the progressive left since the voices on social media tend to skew that way — at least around here.
So those are my general predictions. If you have any of your own, please let me know. I’m always interested.
***
And since we are on the subject of the new year, I thought I’d share my resolution. I’m aiming to get home 15 minutes earlier than I typically do (h/t Jason Zweig). It will be a challenge but well worth it since it will give me about 60 extra hours this year with my family. I also like the idea of letter writer Sonja Davenport (see her letter on this page) of keeping gift cards on hand to give out to those in need. What’s yours?
Jon Mays is the editor in chief of the Daily Journal. He can be reached at jon@smdailyjournal.com. Follow Jon on Twitter @jonmays.
John...maybe you are too young to recall, but the fact is the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) for Bay Meadows was a sham...it was fully packed with business and union interests...much like the so-called Transit Management Agency has been and is now in San Mateo.....THEREFORE..... I assume the same will occur (little regard by the council to what the citizens of San Mateo want) with the 1000 units plus commercial planned for the RossTrader Joe's site...
........from the May 2006....California Planning and Development Report..."Opposing views were really shut out of the process. The decision to develop Bay Meadows was made a long time ago," Bischoff charged. Schinkel, of Friends of Bay Meadows, agreed, calling the CAC "handpicked" and not representative.
Bay Meadows opponents are unconvinced the project will improve congestion, as the proponents have stated. They contend the new connections will only put more cars on existing thoroughfares. Schinkel said that although the train would serve the project, the train is the only good public transit choice, meaning that new residents and office workers mostly will drive. She also questioned why the city needs another dose of office space...".... SEEMS to have been somewhat prophetic....
Jon, no bold predictions. That is OK. It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.
No one predicted the California Democrats would lose its super-majority because of sexual misconduct.
How about, President Trump and AG Jeff Sessions foregoing legal action on California's sanctuary state and legalization of marijuana by allowing North Korea drop a nuke on CA? It would help solve the pension crisis and the Bay Area could be rebuilt in the perfect 21st century model community and everyone that survived would live happily ever after because they suddenly got religion, lived the ten commandments and prospered in the land.
What an absolutely horrible prediction! For a state that has luckily evolved beyond religious hoaxes and other superstitious nonsense, to be dragged back to the darker ages, is not an attractive proposition.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
John...maybe you are too young to recall, but the fact is the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) for Bay Meadows was a sham...it was fully packed with business and union interests...much like the so-called Transit Management Agency has been and is now in San Mateo.....THEREFORE..... I assume the same will occur (little regard by the council to what the citizens of San Mateo want) with the 1000 units plus commercial planned for the RossTrader Joe's site...
........from the May 2006....California Planning and Development Report..."Opposing views were really shut out of the process. The decision to develop Bay Meadows was made a long time ago," Bischoff charged. Schinkel, of Friends of Bay Meadows, agreed, calling the CAC "handpicked" and not representative.
Bay Meadows opponents are unconvinced the project will improve congestion, as the proponents have stated. They contend the new connections will only put more cars on existing thoroughfares. Schinkel said that although the train would serve the project, the train is the only good public transit choice, meaning that new residents and office workers mostly will drive. She also questioned why the city needs another dose of office space...".... SEEMS to have been somewhat prophetic....
Jon, no bold predictions. That is OK. It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.
No one predicted the California Democrats would lose its super-majority because of sexual misconduct.
How about, President Trump and AG Jeff Sessions foregoing legal action on California's sanctuary state and legalization of marijuana by allowing North Korea drop a nuke on CA? It would help solve the pension crisis and the Bay Area could be rebuilt in the perfect 21st century model community and everyone that survived would live happily ever after because they suddenly got religion, lived the ten commandments and prospered in the land.
What an absolutely horrible prediction! For a state that has luckily evolved beyond religious hoaxes and other superstitious nonsense, to be dragged back to the darker ages, is not an attractive proposition.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.