The change has been occurring slowly over many decades. The emergence of women as top executives running San Mateo County public school districts has become a long-running theme.

Today, with the 2025-26 academic year on the horizon in August, 15 of the county’s 23 districts are led by female superintendents, according to their authorized websites.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Terence Y

Thanks for your column today, Mr. Horgan. Regarding public school districts being led now by more female superintendents after a 30 year “transition” does this mean we can draw a correlation between achievement scores trending lower? Student achievement has been stagnant or trending lower through the years. In 2024, it was reported that only 47% of CA kids met standards for English and only 36% for math. How does the trend look in San Mateo County under these superintendents? Regardless, maybe it is time to go back to basics and these superintendents, male and female, can lead the charge. For the kids.

easygerd

Hi TBot, I have to agree with you on this one.

The difference between a DEI candidate and a "DEI candidate" is if the candidate is actually improving "Equity" for all children. "DEI candidates" stop doing good, when they get to power because they think THEY are the equity.

For example the very simple job of Danielle, Lisa and Nicole was to provide more Transportation Equity to North Fair Oaks. It's an Equity Focus Area and there are plenty of county guides and plans on what to do here - even if they lacked the necessary knowledge or understanding of DEI or weren't the brightest bulb in the box.

But all three decided that taking away safe infrastructure from children is totally fine, because they themselves are old, don't like children, don't bike or whatever reason.

But that decision - and violating some 15 city and county plans - tells us Lisa, Nicole and Danielle are merely "DEI candidates" with little interest in providing real equity for others. They think DEI is fixed because they themselves are there.

The fact that we celebrate that all these school districts now have female leadership is just a statistic. But the fact that these schools have enormous per-student funding, but have lowered the per-student spending and have managed to make outcomes for these kids even worse, tells us that ALL these statistics are meaningless. And all these candidates are just as useless as middle-aged white males would be. But at least we were allowed to call those guys out and make fun of them ...

Let's not forget, San Mateo and Redwood City are segregating their school districts on purpose and Nancy Magee and plenty of female board members and female Democrats are supporting this.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here