After months of public hearings that resulted in dozens of possible new supervisorial district maps, a nine-person advisory committee this week narrowed the possibilities down to three drafts.
The Board of Supervisors at its Oct. 8 meeting will consider the trio of maps — and actually can technically consider any of those not on the short list, too — before choosing how it will redraw the district boundaries for future supervisor elections.
Making the cut is the so-called “community unity 4” plan which leaves northern District Five intact as a majority-minority Asian district and lumps into District Four Redwood City, East Palo Alto, east Menlo Park and North Fair Oaks. Committee Chair Adrienne Tissier, Vice-chair Warren Slocum and public member William Nack abstained from voting but the six other members made this map their top choice. The backers of the April 2011 voters’ rights lawsuit which sparked the boundary changes also favor this map.
The second most popular map was submitted by the county’s Republican Party and will be renamed the “equity” map. The third was Nakamura 1G, one of several submitted by James Nakamura. Those two maps also move Redwood Shores from District Three to District Four and split Menlo Park between the two districts.
San Mateo County, the last holdout county in the state with at-large elections, is changing its method in response to a lawsuit which claimed the system violated the California Voting Rights Act by diluting minority votes and precluding Latino and Asian candidates from securing county office. In November 2012, county voters also chose to change the charter and switch to district elections. The new system requires that only voters within one of five specific districts can elect a supervisor who must also hail from that same district. Previously, voters countywide elected all five supervisors even though each lived and represented a specific district.
Recommended for you
The challenge of redistricting has been trying to split the five districts as equally as possible by population while also weighing other factors like race, socioeconomics and voter “diluting.” As the nine-person advisory committee held a series of workshops and hearings, cities proposed for splitting cried foul and cartography experts said there was no possibility of keeping every one intact.
Prior to Tuesday night’s final redistricting recommendation meeting, Slocum told the Daily Journal he expected the Board of Supervisors to have a lengthy discussion before deciding but did not anticipate it requiring more than one meeting.
Once the Board of Supervisors chooses its map, the change should be immediate, according to county spokesman Marshall Wilson.
Along with Tissier, Slocum and Nack, the advisory committee members named by the Board of Supervisors are Daly City Councilman Gonzalo “Sal” Torres, East Palo Alto Councilwoman Laura Martinez, Hayden Lee of Millbrae; Raymond Lee of San Mateo; Barbara Arietta of Pacifica and Rebecca Ayson of Daly City.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.