A city requirement to remove a billboard on a property just west of Highway 101 in San Carlos to make way for a new digital billboard some 2 miles south is a cause for concern for the owner of a specialty car repair shop who said he could lose a source of revenue should the policy take its course.
Mike Keynejad, owner of Eurotech Complete Auto Care at 171 Industrial Road, said he paid a higher price for the property where he operates his business when he purchased it in 1989 because of the revenue potential of the billboard already on the site. Though he was disappointed when his requests to the city to upgrade with a digital billboard on his property were rejected more than 10 years ago, Keynejad said he became very upset to learn through a notice sent to his home in recent weeks that plans to remove the billboard are in motion. Clear Channel Outdoor — the media advertising company leasing a portion of his property to operate the sign — proposed to install a digital billboard at another location in the city along Highway 101, according to Keynejad and the city.
“I’ve been so upset about this issue since I heard about it almost two months ago,” Keynejad said.
According to City Planner Lisa Costa Sanders, a city policy limiting the number of billboards in San Carlos requires those looking to create a new billboard to remove one before they can begin construction. As the owner of the billboard on Keynejad’s property, the decision is Clear Channel’s as to which sign the company decides to take down to make room in the citywide billboard cap, Costa Sanders said. The proposed new digital billboard would be at 815 American St., where a landscape supply store currently stands, according to the city.
Keynejad’s lawyer Bill Garrett said the city’s policy allows the city to lease land from the American Street property owner then offer it to Clear Channel to build the new billboard. The problem, said Garrett, is it unfairly cuts out Keynejad, who was earning the full advertising revenue from the sign per his lease agreement with Clear Channel, which was a revenue source he counted on when he purchased the property. Keynejad noted the revenue he earns from the static billboard on his property is more than enough to pay for his property taxes, which he estimates to be $23,000 a year.
Costa Sanders expected the two leases and an agreement for the removal of the billboard on Keynejad’s property to be up for the City Council’s review in early 2018. She said the arrangement would be considered a source of revenue for the city, but how much revenue it would generate would not likely be known until the council reviews it next year.
The Planning Commission reviewed the design and environmental impact of the new sign Nov. 6. Commissioners voted 3-2 to approve the design and environmental analysis of the new digital sign, with Vice Chair Don Bradley and Commissioner Shannon Bergman voting against both motions, according to a video of the meeting. Costa Sanders said at the meeting residents had raised concerns about the billboard’s safety to drivers during the outreach process — an aspect of the plans she said was under Caltrans’ purview — as well as the removal of the sign on Keynejad’s property.
Recommended for you
At the meeting, Commissioner Angela Harper-Pedersen asked how birds might be affected by the new digital sign, which Costa Sanders said was designed to be consistent with an existing digital sign at 800 Bransten Road. Julie Wright, a representative of David J. Powers & Associates, the firm that conducted the environmental analysis of the billboard, said the lights on the board would be adjusted to avoid any glare for migratory birds.
Though Harper-Pedersen acknowledged the commission’s limitations in weighing in on the project’s safety and fit on the city’s stretch of highway, she said she hoped councilmembers could discuss those matters when they’re up for review by the council.
Though Keynejad and Garrett said they will explore ways they can avoid removing the billboard on Keynejad’s property, they were committed to airing their concerns with the City Council next year.
“It’s ridiculous,” Keynejad, said adding that the city could be helping his business instead of competing with it.
The City of San Carlos took away Private Property Ownership rights several years ago when they saw them a competition for the Billboard income. They changed the ordinance so that Electronic Billboards could only be on Public Property.
[thumbdown]This is pure bologna. The City, which has money, wants to take money from a small city business owner probably barely surviving. This entire area is going down hill. Nobody in any city in the peninsula seems to care about their citizens anymore. Mike at Eurotech has been an asset to San Carlos ever since he moved his business there. He has a nice clean shop, cool car with moving tires on the side of his building, pays his taxes and has employees contributing to society and this is the thanks the city gives him. "We like your billboard, but it is on your property, so we will make an ordinance so that we can take it and leave you with nothing". Thank you city of San Carlos for looking out for the little guy. Most likely one of Mikes employees will have to be laid off now so that you overpaid baboons can get another raise. What a joke!!!
Lose revenue from no potential gun shop, regain revenue from strategically building new billboard on city land, at the expense of the mechanic who will now lose his revenue made from his soon to be demo'd billboard. $23000 county tax??
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
The City of San Carlos took away Private Property Ownership rights several years ago when they saw them a competition for the Billboard income. They changed the ordinance so that Electronic Billboards could only be on Public Property.
[thumbdown]This is pure bologna. The City, which has money, wants to take money from a small city business owner probably barely surviving. This entire area is going down hill. Nobody in any city in the peninsula seems to care about their citizens anymore. Mike at Eurotech has been an asset to San Carlos ever since he moved his business there. He has a nice clean shop, cool car with moving tires on the side of his building, pays his taxes and has employees contributing to society and this is the thanks the city gives him. "We like your billboard, but it is on your property, so we will make an ordinance so that we can take it and leave you with nothing". Thank you city of San Carlos for looking out for the little guy. Most likely one of Mikes employees will have to be laid off now so that you overpaid baboons can get another raise. What a joke!!!
Lose revenue from no potential gun shop, regain revenue from strategically building new billboard on city land, at the expense of the mechanic who will now lose his revenue made from his soon to be demo'd billboard. $23000 county tax??
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.