Daily Journal local dev development land use logo generic

Design amendments required by significant budget overruns are not dissuading San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District officials from pushing ahead toward construction of a new Foster City elementary campus.

Officials presented a timetable for construction of the new school at Charter Square Shopping Center during a recent community meeting which suggested demolition should begin around the end of August.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(4) comments

vincent wei

It seems incompetence reigns with public projects like this.

Who's running the project?......Anyone with construction experience?....or are all the so-called "experts" just feeding at the change order trough?

Construction cost increases...are they only just discovering that now?..... Typically, that very basic contingency is built into the process from the start of the project..... Why is it now only being being brought up and being addressed with 'design amendments' and 'deferred' construction?....in other words, basically watered down quality....parts of which may or may not be built.

Costs have gone up nearly 20% and the project probably won't even start for another two years...And then you wonder why taxpayers are skeptical of how public projects are run and their 'vague' funding conditions...something like the bullet/now snail train to nowhere...

Christopher Conway

there just is no accountability in public work projects and it will be anyone's guess how far out of budget this project goes. Soon, the delays and cost overages will be blamed on our president. Somehow I just know that those responsible for construction and financing this school will start saying "It's all Trumps fault"
I guess the good news is that it is only money...…...Other People's money.

Christopher Conway

Any chance we can call this Donald J Trump Elementary School. We can be the first ones.

Thomas Morgan

It is interesting in a recent Foster City Council meeting one Council Member criticized another Council Member for questioning park improvement and went so far as to attempt imply the criticized Council Member was responsible for cost overruns for having questions. If the shoe fits, then the criticizing council member is at least partially responsible for the cost over run for the school cost overrun since questions and other actions cause delay for the building of the school. So perhaps they should advocate stepping in and help pay for the building that is not being built.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here