Two Bay Area cities have landed on a list of sanctuary jurisdictions that “impede enforcement of federal immigration laws,” according to a statement released by the U.S. Department of Justice.
San Francisco and Berkeley are two of 18 cities the DOJ identified in a list released this week as having policies, regulations or laws that impede immigration enforcement.
“The Department of Justice will continue bringing litigation against sanctuary jurisdictions and work closely with the Department of Homeland Security to eradicate these harmful policies around the country,” U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement.
In the last several months, the DOJ has filed lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions to “compel compliance” with federal immigration law, including New York City at the end of last month. And, in the case of Louisville, the receipt of a letter threatening legal action was enough for the city to revoke their sanctuary status, DOJ officials said in a statement.
The list also includes California, the city of Los Angeles and San Diego County.
Recommended for you
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie reaffirmed support for the city’s immigrant protections and announced more funding for immigrant legal services on the same day the DOJ list was released.
“Under our city’s longstanding policies, local law enforcement does not assist with federal immigration enforcement,” Lurie said in a statement. “These policies help everyone in our city feel comfortable working with our police officers, they make all of San Francisco safer, and as mayor, I will continue to uphold them.”
The DOJ’s list is a narrower version of an earlier list from the Department of Homeland Security that included over 500 sanctuary jurisdictions. That list, released back in May, identified cities like Alameda, Fremont, Martinez, Richmond and Santa Rosa for allegedly obstructing immigration enforcement.
Shortly after the DHS posted the list, it disappeared from the department’s website and the page hosting the former list now says, “Page Not Found.”
For jurisdictions that are already on the list, the DOJ said it will “assist any jurisdiction that desires to be taken off this list to identify and eliminate their sanctuary policies, so they no longer stand in opposition to federal immigration enforcement.”
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.