Editor,
Every property owner has a direct, personal, affordable way to have an immediate impact on the climate crisis, by installing electric heat pumps. They bring value with reduced utility bills and significant greenhouse gas reduction.
Editor,
Every property owner has a direct, personal, affordable way to have an immediate impact on the climate crisis, by installing electric heat pumps. They bring value with reduced utility bills and significant greenhouse gas reduction.
Natural gas proponents say that electricity as a heating unit is four to five times more expensive than natural gas. This is only partially on point, and is, to quote from Mr. Dirk van Ulden in his Jan. 23 letter, an “incomplete picture and is misleading in terms of economics.”
Our family’s three-year experience has been that the cost to buy electricity to run our heat pump water heater and heat pump heating and cooling unit is less than what we were paying for gas.
Unfortunately, omitted from many discussions on electricity is that an electric heat pump operates at five times the energy efficiency of a gas furnace or water heater. In more technical terms, heat pumps in single family homes have a Coefficient of Performance or UEF (Uniform Energy Factor) of 4, meaning that heat pump units are five times more efficient than the typical gas equivalent. Hence, the cost savings.
Let’s acknowledge that installation of a heat pump water heater and heating and cooling heat pump results in a reduction of 7 tons of greenhouse gases per home, per year, every year.
Now is the time to take advantage of rebates and tax credits which make heat pumps affordable for all.
Robert Whitehair
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(4) comments
Mr. Whitehair,
I agree that heat pump water heaters and HVAC do cost lest to operate than similar gas types but unfortunately you paint with a wide brush.
I considered doing the same last year but the pencilled out figures did not pan out for me. Upgrades needed for the electrical and plumbing along with fees and permits and equipment costs would have been in the 15 to 20K range after rebates. Hardly a good investment for someone pushing closer to 80 than 60. The project may not even be completed before I am pushing up daisies! Furthermore, the next owner of the house will probably start over and remodel to their specs and change whatever I do anyway.
Tafhdyd
Agreed. Last year, we had a general contractor in to bid some interior remodeling. Just before he left, I asked him what it would cost to convert our home and appliances to all electric... about $40K. As you and I are in the same age demographic, it doesn't make sense to pay for the conversion.
Take care, buddy.
Mr. Whitehair - thanks for your letter, but you still don’t address the fact that at least half our electricity comes from fossil-fuel burning power plants. You may be happy there are fewer emissions in your backyard but that doesn’t make a whit of difference to the Earth. As for rebates and tax credits, this is just another case of the poor subsidizing the rich, because not everyone has the up-front money to convert. Renters will likely need to “donate” to the rich at least twice: first via rebates to the rich, and second via higher rental costs due to the landlord upgrading.
Ultimately, your electrification efforts amount to little and effectively do nothing to save the planet, especially since China, India, developing nations, and even developed nations are increasing their use of fossil fuels because their “green” electricity capacity isn't enough. Coal use increased 1.4% in 2023, surprising 8.5 billion tonnes. Natural gas use continues to provide more than half the electricity or heating in California, as well as the USA. And let’s not forget the COP attendees who took over 400 private jets to attend a conference to of all things, lecture us on carbon emissions while they burn carbon to their hearts’ desires.
Perhaps, as my friends Taffy and Ray have touched upon, you can provide the numbers for the total cost to install your heat pump water heater and heat pump heating and cooling unit. Or at least provide the time frame for your return on investment. Of course, you’ll need to factor in the additional electricity you’re using now, requiring more natural gas burning to supply your increased demands.
Interesting rebuttal by Mr. Whitehair, his real name BTW. He focused mostly on the reduction of CO2 emissions but ignores the facts stated by others on this forum. Rebates may be offsetting the out-of-pockets costs but some are not available until next year, if ever. Also, once one is committed to a single source of heating energy, a provider such as PCE, has you hooked and can charge with impunity. Right now their rates are indexed to the PG&E rates but who knows what these community providers will do in the future. At least PG&E is still subject to regulatory oversight but in the case of PCE that oversight is relegated to generally politically-driven city councils. As an example, Santa Clara's municipal utility is now subsidizing the Levi's stadium. Mr. Whitehair's main omission actually deals with the completely unknown future cost of grid and distribution facilities that may not be capable of delivering the green energy that Mr. Whitehead savors due to capacity constraints. Good luck!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.