As a longtime San Mateo resident and subscriber to your paper, I would request your limiting Mr. Grocott’s columns when their apparent purpose is to repeat tired Biden conspiracy theories and serves only to promote resentment and create additional polarization of our community.
I read the Journal for local news, which your paper excels at.
Marcyl doesn't like it when Joe Biden and his family are being investigated by the Attorney General and the FBI. Where was her voice when president Trump was falsely accused and impeached by the partisan House for Russia collusion and . It is called free speech, those who can't accept different voices are the ones promoting resentment and creating additional polarization. The fact that Ms. Seidshcher doesn't like to acknowledge the Biden family corruption racket over the last 40 years, let's me know that she is a partisan who has no room in her life for the truth.
It is obvious you right wing fanatics don't know what a mirror is and if you do you don't know how to use it. BTW, the book "Corruption 101" was written by the elder Trump and Kushner and followed to the letter by Donald and Jared.
Agreed... there are many, many devout Trump followers (although I doubt if any evangelicals believe Donald Trump is greater than God) who may reshape or invent facts. But limiting what a conservative columnist can or cannot say is straight out of the CCP playbook.
If Marcyl does not like what Matt has to say, she can turn the page and read the sports section. Limiting op-ed pieces is just not a good idea... opinion pieces are not pretending to be investigative journalism.
So you’re only for freedom of the press when there are conspiracy theories and hoaxes about our great President Trump? Sounds like you should just stick to reading the Journal for local news and ignore the Opinion section. Else, make sure you take your blood pressure pills before reading.
So, Marcyl wants the DJ to limit Matt's columns because she doesn't like what she describes as Matt's conspiracy theories? The answer is simple. Don't read the columns.
The left side of the aisle disagrees with the right and vice versa on a daily basis. But just because a conservative doesn't like what a liberal commentator says doesn't allow that conservative to call for silencing the liberal. And the same logic applies to Marcyl's LTE. Squelching the opposition's voice is wrong. If all it took was an LTE to get a columnist's words removed from the paper, Dorothy Dimitre's career would have been cut short a long, long time ago. (I don't know what Dorothy detested more... conservative ideology or football.)
We can trade conspiracy theories back and forth... or not. We have that choice. Here's another theory... the left leaning MSM has so vilified conservatives that everyday liberals... like Marcyl... have started calling for the silencing of right leaning speakers and writers. That would not have happened in Berkeley in 1964, but it did happen in Berkeley in 2017.
I may not get back to you until later today (if at all)... some medical stuff.
It looks like you saw my reply to A Midyear Christmas. I know you are in for med work today and hopefully you will get clearance so you and I will be able to settle the worlds problems over a beverage after hours as was done in the old days.
As we have discussed before I am not opposed to disagreement and opinions on opposing sides. What bothers me is that some of those on the right that are the most devout followers of Trump and believe he is greater than God himself are the ones that are also the least receptive of straight forward facts when presented to them. Yes, I know there are some on the left that way also.
Two things the Daily Journal could do to perhaps raise the level and accuracy of discourse is to provide disclaimers about the veracity of op-eds and comments, and require the use of real names of commenters. So many fearful "patriots."
Meanwhile, on planet Earth (the round one) AG Barr undercuts President Trump's election conspiracy theories, saying he will not appoint a special counsel to investigate election fraud or Hunter Biden because there is no need.
Don't you love it when a writer starts out with saying that he/she has been a long-term reader or resident of this County? Does that somehow give the writer more gravitas? I pose that in some cases wisdom does not necessarily come with age. She is the poster child for this urban myth. This may change after sleepy Joe is inaugurated, but until January 20th we have a First Amendment right. I find Mr. Grocott's columns a refreshing counterpoint to the the other former politico who lathers her nonsense on us every Monday. But, she has, and should have, her rights as well.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(13) comments
Marcyl doesn't like it when Joe Biden and his family are being investigated by the Attorney General and the FBI. Where was her voice when president Trump was falsely accused and impeached by the partisan House for Russia collusion and . It is called free speech, those who can't accept different voices are the ones promoting resentment and creating additional polarization. The fact that Ms. Seidshcher doesn't like to acknowledge the Biden family corruption racket over the last 40 years, let's me know that she is a partisan who has no room in her life for the truth.
Hello Patrick, George, Christopher,
It is obvious you right wing fanatics don't know what a mirror is and if you do you don't know how to use it. BTW, the book "Corruption 101" was written by the elder Trump and Kushner and followed to the letter by Donald and Jared.
Agreed... there are many, many devout Trump followers (although I doubt if any evangelicals believe Donald Trump is greater than God) who may reshape or invent facts. But limiting what a conservative columnist can or cannot say is straight out of the CCP playbook.
If Marcyl does not like what Matt has to say, she can turn the page and read the sports section. Limiting op-ed pieces is just not a good idea... opinion pieces are not pretending to be investigative journalism.
加州房地产买卖,建筑,投资,开发
And I took some heat for cobbling together some pidgin Norwegian from an online translator?
So you’re only for freedom of the press when there are conspiracy theories and hoaxes about our great President Trump? Sounds like you should just stick to reading the Journal for local news and ignore the Opinion section. Else, make sure you take your blood pressure pills before reading.
Tafhdydicus...
Hey, buddy. First, let me say "Merry Christmas!"
So, Marcyl wants the DJ to limit Matt's columns because she doesn't like what she describes as Matt's conspiracy theories? The answer is simple. Don't read the columns.
The left side of the aisle disagrees with the right and vice versa on a daily basis. But just because a conservative doesn't like what a liberal commentator says doesn't allow that conservative to call for silencing the liberal. And the same logic applies to Marcyl's LTE. Squelching the opposition's voice is wrong. If all it took was an LTE to get a columnist's words removed from the paper, Dorothy Dimitre's career would have been cut short a long, long time ago. (I don't know what Dorothy detested more... conservative ideology or football.)
We can trade conspiracy theories back and forth... or not. We have that choice. Here's another theory... the left leaning MSM has so vilified conservatives that everyday liberals... like Marcyl... have started calling for the silencing of right leaning speakers and writers. That would not have happened in Berkeley in 1964, but it did happen in Berkeley in 2017.
I may not get back to you until later today (if at all)... some medical stuff.
Hi Ray,
It looks like you saw my reply to A Midyear Christmas. I know you are in for med work today and hopefully you will get clearance so you and I will be able to settle the worlds problems over a beverage after hours as was done in the old days.
As we have discussed before I am not opposed to disagreement and opinions on opposing sides. What bothers me is that some of those on the right that are the most devout followers of Trump and believe he is greater than God himself are the ones that are also the least receptive of straight forward facts when presented to them. Yes, I know there are some on the left that way also.
Two things the Daily Journal could do to perhaps raise the level and accuracy of discourse is to provide disclaimers about the veracity of op-eds and comments, and require the use of real names of commenters. So many fearful "patriots."
Hi, Cindy
A disclaimer re: the veracity of op-eds would accomplish little as no one has to present any factual basis for an opinion. And that cuts both ways...
Should we insist on real names in the comments section as you have suggested. In my opinion, "yes." Thank you for doing so.
Meanwhile, on planet Earth (the round one) AG Barr undercuts President Trump's election conspiracy theories, saying he will not appoint a special counsel to investigate election fraud or Hunter Biden because there is no need.
Don't you love it when a writer starts out with saying that he/she has been a long-term reader or resident of this County? Does that somehow give the writer more gravitas? I pose that in some cases wisdom does not necessarily come with age. She is the poster child for this urban myth. This may change after sleepy Joe is inaugurated, but until January 20th we have a First Amendment right. I find Mr. Grocott's columns a refreshing counterpoint to the the other former politico who lathers her nonsense on us every Monday. But, she has, and should have, her rights as well.
Well said.
I agree... left or right... it doesn't matter... freedom of expression applies to all.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.