Matt Grocott

When I was on the San Carlos City Council, one of the policies I followed personally — and that I encouraged my fellow councilmembers to follow as well — related to the growth of the city. When it came to growth, I felt it was important to respect the current citizens of the city who had moved there with a certain expectation of what their new home would be like for many years to come. Everyone knows that growth and change, especially in an urban environment, is to be expected, but it shouldn’t be so quick and major as to overwhelm those who already call the city home.

When a person or family chooses a particular city to lay down roots, there are usually several factors at play. Certainly, two are the size and character of the place. When one chooses a neighborhood or street, these factors become even more important. Questions come to mind such as: What are the sizes of the homes? How densely arranged are they? Are most single story or multilevel? Is there adequate parking or do a lot of residents park on the street, making the neighborhood feel congested?

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(4) comments

markolbert

By a truly amazing coincidence I've just written an article about the exact same concept -- why don't existing residents have priority over newcomers and changes? -- as regards development and the drought.

You can find it at https://council.olbert.com/2021/12/droughts-and-first-come-first-served/.

Spoiler alert: Matt's forgetting, as he often does, that individuals and even communities exist within the context -- and often confines -- of larger communities. Put another way, everyone must be treated equally before the law...and just because you got here first doesn't mean you get any special privileges :).

Needless to say

Ray Fowler

Spoiler alert: Mark's forgetting, as he often does, that individuals and even communities exist within the context -- and often confines -- of larger communities... and while just because someone got here first doesn't mean they get special privileges, but neither do special privileges inure to those who arrive much later and who are committed to altering the context of the community strictly to serve their own purposes.

Lou

Ah yes, this is only the beginning of stories like this with the passage of SB 9 and 10.

Cathy Baird

This has nothing to do with SB 9 and 10. If somebody wanted to put a duplex or 4-plex on that lot, it would be in alignment with SB 9 (and I would support that addition to the supply of housing). What Matt is talking about is a large single-family house surrounded by smaller single-family houses.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here