The fate a new waterfront village that could rise from the flat, industrial plains of Redwood City's Bayfront was delayed after a marathon meeting broke into Tuesday morning.
The City Council delayed the decision after three hours of public testimony from homeowners, housing advocates, unions and a variety of other groups. At 12:10 a.m., the council decided it wanted more detail on a spate of issues - including how the developers will help prevent birds from flying into the new towers and killing themselves - before it makes its decision at the June 7 meeting. The majority of the seven councilmembers voiced general support for the broad plan.
The delay came despite confidence voiced by Mayor Jeff Ira and Councilwoman Rosanne Foust that the plan has been thoroughly examined from every angle after four years in the works.
"Four years is a lot of time to study a lot of the detail," Ira said.
The choice the council was faced with was really something beyond the technicalities that took up much of last night's discussion, he said. Essentially, Ira said it boiled down to whether the city wanted to keep its Bayfront the way it is, or to instead have an attractive urban development on the barren site.
The urban development would create 1,930 much-needed residential units.
The billion-dollar development plan would urbanize the Bayfront with a series of towers - one of which will to climb 21 stories, making it the tallest in the city. The Oracle building, at 17 stories, currently holds that title.
The 43-acre village includes 1,930 residential units, 25,000 square feet of retail space and 150,000 square feet of office space.
Recommended for you
"We've seen several iterations of this project, and nothing's perfect," Foust said. "We could get some really good things from this."
Some speakers told the City Council last night that the project will generate too much traffic and put an enormous stress on the area's fragile environment.
"You're putting too big a project in the middle of an environmentally sensitive place," said resident Robin Smith.
The original plans unveiled more than four years ago by developer Glenborough Pauls boasted 30 towers of equal height.
Developers disagreed.
"This is not a Manhattanization of the Bayfront," said Tim Ridner, representative for developers.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.