South San Francisco is the latest Bay Area city to discuss a possible resolution calling for a cease-fire between Israel and Palestine, which drew over 50 public commenters during a meeting Wednesday, Feb. 28.
Numerous cities throughout the region have discussed passing such resolutions over the last few months, with San Bruno and Foster City ultimately rejecting requests to add it to future council meeting agendas. San Francisco and Oakland have passed cease-fire-related resolutions in the last several months.
The topic was not on the council agenda, meaning councilmembers neither voted on a resolution, nor did they confirm a date for a later discussion. But it seems likely the matter will surface again in the near future. In response to attendees’ comments, Mayor James Coleman verbalized his support for a permanent cease-fire, the release of hostages and adding it to a council discussion at a later date.
“A few months ago, our council experienced a series of extremely antisemitic comments, and our council did not hesitate to condemn antisemitism and all forms of hate. South San Francisco is a diverse community, and as the council, it is our responsibility to ensure everyone feels welcome here. I would be in favor of agendizing a future resolution,” Coleman said.
While such discussions tend to draw a mix of residents in support and opposition, the South City meeting consisted mostly of proponents advocating for a resolution, stating that Gaza’s dire circumstances and thousands of deaths necessitate verbal and unequivocal denunciation by local leaders.
Recommended for you
Councilmember Mark Addiego also supported adding the discussion to a future meeting, stating there are times when the council’s handbook, which says not to be involved in international politics, is “irrelevant.”
“As a City Council, it’s way out of our jurisdiction, but as members of humanity there’s only one choice,” he said.
But some organizations, like the Jewish Community Relations Council — a Bay Area Jewish community collective — have previously stated that cease-fire resolutions can be divisive to communities and do nothing to solve global conflicts.
“Don’t bring this war to your city,” Jeremy Russell, director of marketing and communications, previously said in regards to San Bruno’s attempts to add a similar resolution to its agenda. “These resolutions do nothing to ameliorate the conflict, but they do bring awful consequences to the community. Anything from screaming matches to graffiti to violence.”
A future date for discussing a cease-fire resolution has not been confirmed.
Here we go again… Seems SSF should reduce their city council to part-time. It appears they’ve already solved all the issues in SSF and now have extra time to waste taxpayer money while promoting division rather than unity. At least the council isn’t passing more pay raises for themselves. Or did they do that already?
Of course, if they're willing to first pass a resolution calling out Hamas as a terror organization that massacred Israelis to start the war, I guess it might be okay.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Here we go again… Seems SSF should reduce their city council to part-time. It appears they’ve already solved all the issues in SSF and now have extra time to waste taxpayer money while promoting division rather than unity. At least the council isn’t passing more pay raises for themselves. Or did they do that already?
Of course, if they're willing to first pass a resolution calling out Hamas as a terror organization that massacred Israelis to start the war, I guess it might be okay.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.