South San Francisco officials gave favorable reviews to a proposal to build 22 townhouses in a development at the intersection of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive, near Skyline Boulevard.
The South San Francisco Planning Commission unanimously agreed by a 5-0 vote, with commissioners Michele Evans and Alex Tzang absent, to recommend approval of the project during a meeting Thursday, Dec. 20.
Commissioner Sam Shihadeh lauded the vision of the project, which is proposed adjacent to a similar townhome development on the western portion of the city.
“It’s a good project,” he said, according to video of the meeting. “It’s needed in the area.”
Commissioner Alan Wong concurred, noting the proposal comprised of for-sale homes is a welcome departure from the influx of large, dense, apartment buildings targeting downtown which have flooded South City’s planning desk over recent years.
“It’s refreshing to see a project like this,” said Wong.
Under the commission’s approval, the project will head to the South San Francisco City Council, where officials will make a final decision on its fate.
The proposal aims to construct similar three-story attached townhomes, which will range in size between 1,500 square feet and 2,600 square feet with between three and four bedrooms.
A key component of the forthcoming discussion will be the amount of affordable units included in the project, as well as where those units are located, planning commissioners noted.
David Agee, a representative of development firm Warmington Residential, said his company is prepared to set aside three of the units at an affordable rate — in alignment with state law requiring 15 percent of for-sale projects to be priced at below-market rates.
Commissioner Norm Faria though prepared Agee for a forthcoming conversation with councilmembers in which he would likely be asked to offer more affordable units.
Recommended for you
Commission Chair JulieAnn Murphy also asked Agee to consider spreading the units throughout the development, rather than concentrating them in a group as is currently proposed.
“It would be smart to have all the affordable units not clumped in one area,” she said.
As it stands, the composition of the development is divided in two unit clusters on opposing ends of the parcel, with eight units proposed near the intersection of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive and another 14 at an opposing corner.
The design is constructed in respect of a fault line which subdivides the property, rendering it unsuitable for residential development. As a result, the unbuildable land will be left as private open space for tenants. Portions of the property are also on a sizable slope, further complicating development. In all, nearly 70 percent of the nearly 5 acres will be left as open space.
Considering the constraints of the geography, commissioners lauded the developer’s ability to make the most out of land which was initially targeted for building in 2006, before the proposal was withdrawn.
“It is a good use of that type of narrow space,” said Faria.
Recognizing the previous failed attempts to develop the site, as well as the creative approach to a piece of property imperfect for development, Murphy too expressed her appreciation for the proposal.
“The constraints on this site were quite a few, so to see that they were able to work out a development that seems sensitive to the constraints, it’s good to see,” she said.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.