In the latest meeting discussing the complete revamp of Laurel Street, the San Carlos City Council decided that an interactive fountain element in the downtown’s center could pose problems, but still want a water feature of some sort.
Responding to a proposed splash pad with “water blooms” inspired by central coast flora, Mayor Sara McDowell and Vice Mayor Pranita Venkatesh said at the meeting March 10, just how chaotic an interactive water feature may be in the dense urban shopping hub.
The water feature is proposed across Laurel Street from an elevated pavilion that will be placed near Harrington Park.
The interactive water design was pitched with entertaining children a priority, but McDowell worried over the burden that could be placed on nearby restaurants and stores, and said she is not a fan of an interactive element.
“Having an open fountain like this, kids are going to run in there, get soaking wet, and then go to the Reading Bug and make everything wet — that’s literally what’s going to happen,” McDowell said.
Venkatesh shared she was in support of the water feature being a more visual asset rather than interactive.
“When I think about downtown, I think about something that’s really zen and calm,” Venkatesh said. “I work with kids, and they’re loud. You add water to that element, and you get even louder kids.”
Disagreeing, Councilmember John Dugan said he goes to downtown as a place to feel energized rather than zen.
“I’m looking for activation and community and a space where people are gathering, so I view it as a major feature that kids would be drawn to these major “bloom” interactive features,” Dugan said.
Recommended for you
However, Dugan did acknowledge the insight McDowell and Venkatesh shared over families visiting and children getting soaked. When the two shared their concern over an interactive feature, Dugan said “every mom in the room nodded along.”
City staff is roughly budgeting anywhere between $750,000 and $1 million for the water feature, however, estimates could significantly fluctuate as designs become finalized. The interactive water feature proposed was estimated to cost around $1.5 million, raising concern over making such an investment.
A second design proposal included a fog element that some felt was interesting while others worried over the ultimate waste of water and how cold the fog could feel. A third design proposal was a more traditional artistic fountain, which was identified as a far more practical option, but possibly mundane by councilmembers.
The two other proposals were estimated within the budget, but councilmembers also maintained that if an investment is to be made in a water feature, they would like it to be unique and more interesting than a traditional fountain.
McDowell said it will be critical for more exact numbers to be proposed at future council meetings so decisions can be made keeping priorities of the entire revamp project in mind.
“In some ways we’re building a $5 million fountain and there’s no way,” McDowell said. “This is one piece of our downtown, but there’s a lot of pieces of our downtown that we need to construct.”
San Carlos is designing the first phase of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, including the redesign of Harrington Park and Laurel Street between Cherry and Olive streets. Councilmembers also gave staff and consultants feedback on furnishing, planting and lighting.
The water feature is proposed on the opposite side of an elevated pavilion that will be placed where Harrington Park and Laurel Street meet.
A finalized design for the first installation of the downtown redesign is planned for review and confirmation in April.
It's not only the cost of the asset - such as a fountain - it's the perpetual cost of operation and maintenance, and then the eventual asset replenishment. Choose VERY wisely what you commit to fund forever in your capital assets.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
It's not only the cost of the asset - such as a fountain - it's the perpetual cost of operation and maintenance, and then the eventual asset replenishment. Choose VERY wisely what you commit to fund forever in your capital assets.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.