Portola Elementary School students and parents rally for the return of principal Dr. Sheila Krotz, outside of the San Bruno Park School District office before a Board of Trustees meeting on Thursday, Jan. 17.
A month after a beloved San Bruno Park School District principal was put on administrative leave, parents turned out to a trustees meeting last week to implore the board to not fire the administrator who brings needed guidance and comfort to the school.
Portola Elementary School principal, Dr. Sheila Krotz, was placed on administrative leave in mid-December and escorted off campus. Parents have shown an outpouring of support for Krotz ever since, asserting the educator is an irreplaceable stabilizing figure for the school.
Similar messages were shared before and during a Board of Trustees meeting Thursday, Jan. 17, during which the board was expected to discuss an employee’s discipline, dismissal or release. Parents gathered outside of the district office to hold a silent rally in support of Krotz before the meeting and many spoke in support of keeping Krotz as an employee during public comment.
“Have you ever had someone make a significant, positive and lasting impact on your life that you will never forget? Now think back on your childhood, can you remember individuals who really cared, who made a difference? For my children and me, that person is Dr. Sheila Krotz,” Jessica Carrillo, an active parent in the community, said during public comment. “We all know parenthood is really hard and we all need guidance and leadership and she was that for us.”
The day before Krotz was placed on leave, she gave an impassioned speech during a Board of Trustees meeting, during which Krotz asserted her employment was being threatened after she reprimanded a physical educator for not taking action during an incident involving a male student who allegedly touched the chest of a female student during a game of tag.
District officials have said they cannot comment on the specific incident other than to say the issue was fully investigated and the necessary actions were taken. Krotz, who was lauded by the mother of the girl who was touched, had shared concerns that the educator was still employed with the district.
Recommended for you
Krotz also criticized Superintendent Matt Duffy who issued her a reprimand letter and threatening termination and accused the district of violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act by contacting her doctor.
Since then, more than 500 people have also signed an online petition calling for Krotz to be immediately reinstated to her position, for the district to initiate remediation between Krotz, Duffy and the Board of Trustees and for parents to be better engaged on personnel issues in the future. A second petition calling for Duffy to be placed on leave has also received more than 500 signatures.
Without Krotz on campus, parents and staff say students are suffering and they’re unsure of what to tell their children. At the very least, parents requested that an independent investigation be completed before any decision was made on Krotz’s employment.
“I would just appreciate your help illuminating when a decision will be made about the future of Dr. Krotz as Portola’s principal. I’m coming from a place of deep concern about the trauma that this incident is causing at Portola,” Jenny Debevec, district counselor serving at Portola Elementary. “I’m seeing increased signs of that trauma, including anxiety, worry, crying, a lack of focus, inability of students to access their education, not to mention the grief that the staff is feeling as well.”
The push to save Krotz isn’t over. Though no one specified whether the closed session discussion was about Krotz, trustees informed parents that they would be required by law to report on any actions taken during the discussion and Trustee Jennifer Blanco suggested parents remain tuned into the meeting for a possible answer.
Once out of closed session, board President Raymond Giusti said no action was taken and adjourned the meeting. District officials have said they cannot comment further on the confidential personnel matter.
Is the next step a lawsuit or lawsuits? Maybe since district officials say they can’t comment on the incident, will rumors begin flying until an official account is provided? Imagine the additional trauma to not just students, but to everyone as this drags on. Please keep updating this story…
Terrence Y - I was involved with one of these "we can't say anything' memos and what it is - is a hocus pocus safety valve created about 40 years ago to protect the teacher(s) in one regard and one regard only.
The example is this: A coach/teacher gets hired and leaves off in their application that that had a prior DUI - submitted their paperwork any way - got the job etc.
Meanwhile, down the line, say 5 years later it came to the attention of the District and they now can/will fire with just cause.
At that moment - the intent of the now "overused, we can't say anything, its a personnel matter edict" - would be valid and it would protect the teacher/coach.
Again the way it is used 99% of the time is wrong.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Is the next step a lawsuit or lawsuits? Maybe since district officials say they can’t comment on the incident, will rumors begin flying until an official account is provided? Imagine the additional trauma to not just students, but to everyone as this drags on. Please keep updating this story…
Terrence Y - I was involved with one of these "we can't say anything' memos and what it is - is a hocus pocus safety valve created about 40 years ago to protect the teacher(s) in one regard and one regard only.
The example is this: A coach/teacher gets hired and leaves off in their application that that had a prior DUI - submitted their paperwork any way - got the job etc.
Meanwhile, down the line, say 5 years later it came to the attention of the District and they now can/will fire with just cause.
At that moment - the intent of the now "overused, we can't say anything, its a personnel matter edict" - would be valid and it would protect the teacher/coach.
Again the way it is used 99% of the time is wrong.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.