Bills target dangerous drivers

“Sacramento is listening. We see that there is a problem and we are doing what we can, crossing that partisan divide and trying to identify real solutions that we can deliver now to make our communities safer,” said Democratic Assemblymember Nick Schultz of Burbank, chair of the Assembly Public Safety Committee.

The Assembly proposals are one component of a broader reckoning over years of rising traffic deaths playing out at the Capitol. Next week, a separate event is expected to include more details about new bills from the California Senate, related budget proposals and the perspective of families who have lost loved ones to drunk drivers.

Last month, Schultz introduced a bill to increase penalties for repeat DUI offenders. Assembly members detailed several additional legislative efforts at today’s press conference that would: 

Close a diversion loophole

We reported in December that a criminal justice reform law from a few years ago was allowing judges to dismiss misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter charges for drivers who agreed to take part in what’s known as a diversion program. But in an unintended twist, that has meant the drivers not only avoided a criminal conviction but also kept a clean driving record. 

Assembly Member Lori Wilson, a Democrat from Suisun City who chairs the Assembly Transportation Committee, introduced a new bill that would require the DMV to add points to a driver’s license when they’re granted misdemeanor diversion.

Shift license suspensions and revocations

Currently, someone who is convicted of felony vehicular manslaughter would likely, by law, have their license revoked for three years. But the revocation would often start while they’re in prison and they might be eligible to get their license back as soon as they’re out. 

Wilson said her office is finalizing language on another bill that would change that. 

“Driving is a privilege,” Wilson said. “This package holds dangerous drivers accountable and keeps our streets safer for everyone.”

Ignition interlock devices

This is now the third time that Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris, a Democrat from Irvine,  has introduced this measure. California is currently one of the few states that doesn’t require first time offenders to install the technology, which forces a driver to blow into a breathalyzer and prove they haven’t been drinking in order to start their car. Her previous efforts failed after the Department of Motor Vehicles raised budget concerns and civil liberties groups worried it would disproportionately impact the poor and people of color. 

“California is the epicenter of America’s DUI and drunk driving epidemic. As moms, as dads, as Californians, it’s horrifying. And as policymakers, we have an opportunity and we have an obligation to do something about this,” Petrie-Norris said. “We know these devices work. We know that they can save lives.”

Increase training for DUI laws

Assemblymember Juan Alanis, a Republican from Modesto, said currently many officers only get basic training at the academy on drunk and drugged driving and must often wait for colleagues with more specialized training to assess a driver’s sobriety level.

“This is to help those agencies and officers to be able to have that training so that way we can identify DUI drivers faster, quicker and get them off the streets,” Alanis said.

Schultz called the package of proposals a “starting point” and said he expects his colleagues in the state Senate will also be proposing changes to save lives on the road.

Indeed, last month State Sen. Bob Archuleta, a Democrat from Norwalk, introduced a bill to crack down on DUIs — increasing punishment and making it easier for prosecutors to charge repeat offenders with murder.

Archuleta is expected to hold a press conference later this month along with Mothers Against Drunk Driving, road safety advocates and other lawmakers to announce further road safety bills.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.