SAN FRANCISCO -- The San Jose Mercury News decided to pull its Sunday magazine because an anti-GOP cover story scheduled to run just two days before the general election raised concerns about fairness, editors said.
Mercury News executive editor David Yarnold sent a memo to staffers Friday explaining that the Sunday issue of the newspaper's SV (Silicon Valley) magazine lacked balance and that the decision to yank it was "unfortunate" and "embarrassing."
"This is going to result in some major upheaval because two-thirds of the Sunday insert packages are complete," Yarnold told staffers in a memo Friday.
The cover story of the magazine was a personal essay by Mercury News reporter and lifelong Democrat David Early. In his essay, he wondered how anyone he liked or admired could be a Republican.
The Mercury News enlisted employees from all departments Friday to remove 200,000 copies of the magazine that had already been inserted into Sunday editions. Another 150,000 copies of the magazine had yet to be inserted, but some copies of the SV insert had likely hit the streets before they could be removed, Yarnold said.
"I think it's likely that some will slip through," Yarnold told The AP Saturday. When asked if any editorial policy changes would be made it light of the magazine pullback, Yarnold replied "I'm sure we're all going to learn from this."
Yarnold said the edition of SV magazine lacked an opposing point of view. He also stated that the magazine didn't meet Mercury News standards because it was to appear on newsstands just two days before the general election.
"Every day, in our editorial mission statement on page two, we say we are passionate about accuracy and fairness," Yarnold said. "This is an unfortunate, embarrassing decision, but it's true to our values."
Recommended for you
Early's essay would have been fine if it had run three months earlier, according to Yarnold. He went on to tell Mercury News employees that Early was a dedicated writer and the magazine's removal was not intended as a criticism of him.
One media analyst said the Mercury News caught the issue just time to avoid further damage.
"What happened to the checks and balances that would have seen the red flags waving all over this one?" said Al Tompkins, who teaches journalists at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies in Florida.
"It's a good thing that they minimized the harm as much as possible by not allowing the magazine to hit the streets," Tompkins said. "But it doesn't completely erase the damage that has been done."
Tompkins said research shows many voters are already suspicious that reporters often allow their political preferences to shape news coverage and that incidents such as this would only exacerbate the problem.
The cost of removing the magazine from the Sunday edition was unknown.
Advertisements scheduled to appear in this Sunday's SV magazine will run in other portions of the Sunday Mercury News or in future editions of the magazine, according to the Mercury News.<
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.