Editor,
Redwood City residents recently received a notice of a second proposed increase in garbage rates just this year. What is particularly troubling is the way in which the cost increase in administered.
Editor,
Redwood City residents recently received a notice of a second proposed increase in garbage rates just this year. What is particularly troubling is the way in which the cost increase in administered.
If the most recent increase proceeds, environmentally conscious customers who use the smallest, 20-gallon containers will be seeing a 41% increase in garbage rates. But customers with the large containers will see no increase whatsoever.
It is not aligned with the city’s climate change and sustainability goals to be burdening the most responsible customers (i.e., those who send the least to landfill) with the entire cost increase.
The city’s argument is that they need to align fees with the actual cost of delivering the service, and there is a high fixed cost to have a truck drive by regardless of the amount of trash picked up and sent to landfill.
There has to be a better solution and this just doesn’t seem right. Customers are charged for water and electricity based on usage tiers. So people who use more pay disproportionately more, which makes sense. It is akin to an environmental impact fee.
The same should apply to garbage. If someone has a high carbon footprint and sends a lot to a landfill, they should pay disproportionately more (not less).
I have written to Redwood City Council and filed a protest with these thoughts and hope other residents do the same. Their email is council@redwoodcity.org.
Chris Robell
Redwood City
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(2) comments
As with the City of San Mateo, money is needed for increased pensions and benefits, so… Perhaps folks can consolidate their garbage into a single bin, while canceling everyone else’s account? Cancel your service and offer to split the bill with commercial garbage container accounts?
Thank you, Chris! Your sentiment about the environmental impact fee is spot on for this analysis. So many times, garbage is talked about as "thrown away" but there is no "away"... it simply becomes pollution that's a lasting legacy we leave behind. It's up to our municipal services and officials to influence this in the right way.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.