Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Support the Peninsula’s only locally-owned newspaper. Subscribe!
Subscribing annually brings you big savings. We also offer monthly and weekly subscriptions.
Premium Subscription
As low as $8.25 per week
Premium Includes:
-- Access to the Daily Journal’s e-Edition: a digital replica of our daily newspaper including crossword puzzles, games, comics, classifieds and ads. You can download a digital replica of the Daily Journal for offline reading. You can also clip & download articles or images from the e-edition to share with others The most recent 90 issues are available at any given time.
-- Unlimited access to our award-winning online content
-- Commenting access on all stories as a valued member of the DJ community
-- NEW! Access to our online-only digital crossword puzzle. A new puzzle every day, seven days a week!
Support the Peninsula’s only locally-owned newspaper. Subscribe!
Subscribing annually brings you big savings. We also offer monthly and weekly subscriptions.
DJ Basic Subscription
As low as $5 per month
Basic includes:
-- Unlimited access to our award-winning online content
-- Commenting access on all stories as a valued member of the DJ community
What you're missing -- Additional features available only with the Premium level:
-- Access to the Daily Journal’s e-Edition: a digital replica of our daily newspaper including crossword puzzles, games, comics, classifieds and ads. You can download a digital replica of the Daily Journal for offline reading. You can also clip & download articles or images from the e-edition to share with others The most recent 90 issues are available at any given time.
-- NEW! Access to our online-only digital crossword puzzle. A new puzzle every day, seven days a week!
Peninsula Clean Energy is providing cities across San Mateo County with grant money to fund clean energy projects as part of a $68 million community reinvestment program, CEO Shawn Marshall said.
Workers install solar panels on a residential roof in San Diego.
Reuters
“It’s a way to really accelerate the progress that the cities are already starting to make against reduction in greenhouse gasses and electrification. It provides an added incentive to get a number of projects hopefully across the goal line,” Marshall said.
PCE is funded by ratepayers, Marshall said, with occasional funding from the California Public Utilities Commission for specific projects. The PCE board set an upper-limit target for cash reserves and, if that amount is exceeded, a surplus fund committee meets to decide how to to reallocate the funding to the benefit of customers and communities.
Grant funding from PCE — a joint powers agency that assists San Mateo County and the city of Los Banos in providing clean-energy electricity — totals $11.5 million, although individual cities were given specific funding based on electric load and number of customers.
There isn’t a deadline for grant money use, which is non-competitive, although cities must submit project proposals to PCE and spend it within two years of allocation. Applications for the project were released last Friday.
“It’s meant to be flexible funding that is focused on anything that really aligns with Peninsula Clean Energy’s mission. So that would be things like projects that switch out gas appliances,” Marshall said as an example. “We have another local government that's looking to use the funding for putting solar on their streetlights in areas where they're having trouble maintaining connection.”
Although the grant process has just begun, cities like Burlingame are looking to large-scale projects that include electrifying the library or other non-electric city buildings, as well as programs to help residents transition to clean energy use in everyday life.
“We'd like to provide rebates to our residents, that may be connected with our recently adopted gas leaf blower fan, so maybe provide some rebates for electric leaf blowers and maybe help residents do some energy home audits,” Burlingame Sustainability Coordinator Sigalle Michael said. “We're exploring both how to enhance facilities and also give back some sort of benefit to residents in the community.”
The city recently had an introductory meeting with PCE on potential options for spending their potential allocation, which totals $540,317, Michael said. They’re also interested in putting out a survey to see what incentives residents would find most beneficial.
“Because the whole idea of electrification and climate resilience can maybe feel a little intimidating, and I think people may really be searching for how to’s,” Michael said. “This type of program will be like one step into ‘this is what you can do, and we can actually support you in doing that.’”
Recommended for you
Redwood City is looking at putting its grant money toward solar power installation on a city facility, Public Works Director Terence Kyaw said.
“All these government agencies are looking for alternative resiliency,” Kyaw said of the benefits of the grant program.
Solar panels, for example, could provide backup battery power so the city wouldn’t need to run a generator for the chosen facility in case of power outage. But the grant won’t cover the entire cost, which is around $4 million, Kyaw said.
The city is still in the early stages of analyzing which city facility would be best for soar panels as well as just how they’ll apply for the money to be used, Kyaw said.
Cities can submit more than one project proposal, Marshall said, and topics can range from building electrification and electric vehicle charging stations to heat pump systems in government facilities.
“It's everything from larger infrastructure projects around electrification and energy to smaller, specific needs that that city or county might have,” she said.
The funding is part of a larger community redistribution effort that also covers $10 million in residential battery loans, funding for upgraded clean electric and water heating in schools and a $300 income-qualified bill credit.
San Mateo has been allocated the most grant money, at $1,406,718, with Redwood City at $1,265,866, South San Francisco at $1,263,372 and Daly City at $1,059,658. Smaller cities like Portola Valley and Woodside received $64,415 and $112,915, respectively, with middle-sized cities falling somewhere in the middle.
Watch out folks - this is another step toward dependency on a single energy source. These grants are not cheap as they will eventually show up in your PCE bills. As an example, the article about clean energy in Redwood City whereby their so-called energy expert discusses the latest fad, energy resilience, estimates the combination of solar panels and standby batteries to cost $4 million. That should you give the shivers. Instead, a reliable gas-driven generator would cost less than $20 grand and is far more viable. But, PCE has its ulterior motive to ban the use of far more economical and reliable natural gas and will sway gullible council members. Don't fall for it!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
Watch out folks - this is another step toward dependency on a single energy source. These grants are not cheap as they will eventually show up in your PCE bills. As an example, the article about clean energy in Redwood City whereby their so-called energy expert discusses the latest fad, energy resilience, estimates the combination of solar panels and standby batteries to cost $4 million. That should you give the shivers. Instead, a reliable gas-driven generator would cost less than $20 grand and is far more viable. But, PCE has its ulterior motive to ban the use of far more economical and reliable natural gas and will sway gullible council members. Don't fall for it!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.