I know we’ve all been busy with all of the hubbub about the presidential debates, hearings, immunity, and all of the things, but something else recently happened that’s worth your time to pause and learn about.
On June 28, in a 6-3 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a precedent set by the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council case, commonly referred to as “Chevron deference.” As one of the most cited cases in the history of American law (over 19,000 times in the past 40 years), Chevron deference essentially gave federal agencies the ability to interpret ambiguous statutes passed by Congress.
While Chevron deference has not been cited in Supreme Court cases since 2016, it has seen continued use in lower court cases year after year. The change represents a significant shift in how most of us understand how federal agencies work.
The good
The reality with interpretation is that it is just that‚ it is subjective and while federal agencies are not guaranteed to adopt the political leanings of newly sworn-in executive branch leadership, these agencies do typically align their priorities against the president’s agenda. The overturning of the Chevron deference means that the responsibility resides with Congress to ensure that laws passed provide enough clarity for federal agencies to operate. And when this is not the case, it is the courts — not the federal agencies — that hold the interpretive power.
As well, the ruling specifies that courts may give “substantial weight” to an agency based on their subject matter expertise, in particular when the agency’s interpretation has been consistent. Existing precedent citing Chevron deference will not be revisited.
The bad
In particular, pundits have cited concerns about the reduced scope and authority that the Environmental Protection Agency and Securities and Exchange Commission could have moving forward. For example, the SEC’s March 2022 Climate-Related Disclosures Rule proposed a new requirement for public companies to include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports.
While annual sustainability reports have become much more common, the lack of standardization creates a lot of room for positioning — positioning like Google’s 2024 Environmental Sustainability Report which says they replenished 1 billion gallons of water representing 18% of their freshwater consumption from data centers and offices, conveniently skirting that the company used 5.56 billion gallons of water in 2023. It takes a lot of water to cool data centers and well, Google has a lot of really big data centers. To put that into perspective, 5.56 billion gallons of water would give residents of Flint, Michigan, clean water for roughly one year and 9 months.
Without federal agencies creating standards to theoretically protect and inform the American people, we are left to our own devices and ability to cut through the marketing speak and actually understand what is happening. Yes, I know, some of you challenge the intent of “protect and inform” — let’s save that for another day.
Recommended for you
The probable reality
Expect change and likely most things to take longer when it comes to the federal government.
The ability for federal agencies to interpret legal statutes meant that Congress was able to provide general guidance and allow those agencies to fill in the gaps with their expertise. While almost certainly there have been times when agencies have overstepped with their interpretations, most of the time Chevron deference has enabled agencies to simply operate across their areas of accountability.
Given the increasingly partisan nature of Congress (and politics in general), it will likely take much longer for bills with all of the necessary specificities to be negotiated and passed. And more likely than not, bills with all of the details simply won’t be passed unless both the House, Senate and executive office are party controlled.
And, with interpretation now falling to the courts, the courts very simply are going to be slammed.
It’s never been a better time to become a lawyer
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. It’s truly never been a better time to go to law school. Take your pick — corporate securities, environmental, administrative, health care, regulatory compliance, appellate litigation, financial services, intellectual property, constitutional law, antitrust, cybersecurity, telecommunications, employment, energy — the list goes on and on. If 19,000 cases deferred to Chevron in the past 40 years (which also set precedence for other potential cases), just think about the volume that will be brought forward in the next decade alone. Jump in, it’s your time to shine.
Signed, not a lawyer.
Annie Tsai is chief operating officer at Interact (tryinteract.com), early stage investor and advisor with The House Fund (thehouse.fund), and a member of the San Mateo County Housing and Community Development Committee. Find Annie on Twitter @meannie.
Ms. Tsai, thanks for your column today on the Chevron deference and its impact. In this day and age when the administrative state has become more partisan, it is a good thing that bills take longer to get through Congress. If our lawmakers don’t understand bills and their impact and are willing to pass general guidelines, where does that leave the people who elected them - at the mercy of partisan administrators. We all know the devil is in the details and as such, partisanship and hyper-partisanship would eventually enter into the fray, resulting in SCOTUS overturning the Chevron doctrine. Now if a number of bad apples didn’t turn into a whole bushel of rotten apples, the Chevron doctrine may not have been overturned by SCOTUS.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Great piece. Thanks for clarifying several positions on this ruling.
Ms. Tsai, thanks for your column today on the Chevron deference and its impact. In this day and age when the administrative state has become more partisan, it is a good thing that bills take longer to get through Congress. If our lawmakers don’t understand bills and their impact and are willing to pass general guidelines, where does that leave the people who elected them - at the mercy of partisan administrators. We all know the devil is in the details and as such, partisanship and hyper-partisanship would eventually enter into the fray, resulting in SCOTUS overturning the Chevron doctrine. Now if a number of bad apples didn’t turn into a whole bushel of rotten apples, the Chevron doctrine may not have been overturned by SCOTUS.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.