Jon Mays

What is it about this place that draws so many, aggravates so many, forces out so many and keeps so many of us here? The short answer is the weather and the opportunity. The long answer is something altogether different but more visceral — a sense of home. And San Mateo County is certainly becoming home to more people.

There has been a population boom around here, at least if you consider that there were around 3,214 people counted around here in 1860. Not a lot of Tesla drivers in that crowd I’m sure. There was a big boom in the 1950s and ’60s, when the population went from 111,782 in 1940 to 235,659 in 1950 and 444,387 in 1960. I’m sure someone was thinking at the time, just where are we going to fit all these people? It’s estimated there are about 769,545 in its 744 square miles nowadays and if you ask most people they will tell you half are on Highway 101 at about 5 p.m. every weekday. The other half are in line at the 17th Avenue Safeway Friday nights.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(2) comments

BenToy

My sentiments exactly !

Human society is based on growth, as all measures are with growth (lack thereof, stagnant, growth)

San Mateo, The Peninsula, SF Bayarea are wonderful places to live and consider it lucky to be here

Eaadams

"you might think that the way some people talk that homes were practically free in the 1970s" my favorite way to measure of housing costs is years of *after tax* income for 20%. In 2019 Median Income is $116,653, takehome is 66.75% of that or $77,865. A 2019 median Home is 1.55M, so 20% is will take 4 years of someone making a full family of 4 median salary, hopefully they have somoene else in the house making the money to pay insurance, rent, childcare, retirement savings etc...

Now lets use just 1991 to compare, not even 1970. I chose 1991 because I found it from California Association of Realator data online. Median home price in SMC for 1991 was $328,310. Median Income $30,269, taxes were less ~21%. So, in 1991 take home pay was ~$23,900, or 2.7 years of take home pay to get to 20%.

So, compared with 1990 it takes 50% longer to afford that 20% home down payment. Let alone 1970. If anyone can dig up that info please do.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here