tdonnelly

tdonnelly

The large contributions will still occur, just on the sly. What is needed is campaign spending limits. That will keep the playing field level.

tdonnelly

tdonnelly commented on Too many jobs, too little housing

Developers are calling the shots.

tdonnelly

tdonnelly commented on Open door policy

Ventilation is important, especially now. Kids aren't yet vaccinated and we don't know how long the protection lasts. Besides we have great weather and it costs nothing to open the door.

tdonnelly

You can ask for reductions in water usage, or invite more housing, but you can't do both.

tdonnelly

I agree with you regarding at-large elections for mayor. Having a mayor elected by 20% of the electorate, at most, is not democracy.

I have to disagree with you regarding district election in San Francisco. They are not to blame for the City's slide. Mayor Breed is considered a "mod…

tdonnelly

tdonnelly commented on Follow science and not politics

Thanks for sorting through the data to keep us informed. I noticed you stated "because of covid" when referring to hospitalizations. I have heard that some 50% of "covid hospitalizations" the virus was not the primary reason for the hospitalization, but was detected as a result of a stand…

tdonnelly

Thanks for your thoughts on this important issue. I think district elections will allow residents access to the levers of control in their community. One important, and so far overlooked problem with the rotating mayor system combined with district elections is that the mayor will have be…

tdonnelly

tdonnelly commented on Equity

It was funny to see them dance around the issue. I would venture to say the "equity" is the new word for "affirmative action", which has been outlawed (twice). They still want to discriminate so they found a new name, hoping they can get away with it.

tdonnelly

tdonnelly commented on Housing over parking

Who says the employees want to live there? Young people want to live in the City, not out in the boonies.

tdonnelly

tdonnelly commented on The First Amendment and Section 230

The question I have is why you support the "thought police" and are against free speech?