The San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office has filed a civil lawsuit seeking nearly half a million dollars from a business owner accused of violating state environmental laws, an allegation the San Gregorio man adamantly denies.
The district attorney filed the case Tuesday against Skylonda Equipment Inc., a San Gregorio-based company in the business of wildland fire prevention and land clearing, and its owner Richard Rogers. The allegations include the company diverting water and polluting a creek, violating laws on how hazardous waste is handled, engaging in timber operations without proper licensing and improperly storing an above-ground petroleum tank, according to the lawsuit.
For the various alleged violation of state codes related to health and safety, fish and game, as well as business and professions; the district attorney is seeking at least $430,000 and the cost of the lawsuit, according to the complaint.
Rogers adamantly denies all of the allegations and said he’s worked hard to improve and care for his property in the hills. But in the midst of litigation, Rogers said he couldn’t comment further on the case.
Deputy District Attorney John Wilson, who’s in charge of the county’s consumer and environmental protection division, said the suit is about upholding regulations aimed at benefiting the public and environment.
“We really live in a beautiful place in the world, and our coastline, our mountains, our forests, are just wonderful opportunities for both recreation and for tourism, which is a major industry,” Wilson said. “The DA’s office, working with our partners, we believe the enforcement of environmental laws is essential both to protect public health and our natural resources, and also to protect the economy.”
Several of the alleged environmental violations stem from a road and bridge that were built without proper permits. The suit alleges the construction caused deposits of hazardous materials, such as asphalt, on the banks of the San Gregorio Creek. During a September 2015 inspection, officials determined Rogers diverted water from the creek through a pump, as well as by laying a large tarp across the creek, according to the lawsuit.
“Even dirt is something that deleterious or harmful to the wildlife that’s living in the creek,” said Deputy District Attorney Crystal Chau, who added there were “two separate sites where there was a pump in the creek pumping water into a water truck.”
Recommended for you
Despite efforts to work with Rogers, they were unable to resolve most of these issues prompting the lawsuit, Wilson said.
An attorney representing Rogers did not return a request for comment.
The cases were referred to the District Attorney’s Office by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, as well as the county’s Environmental Health Services Division. After a lengthy investigation, the District Attorney’s Office filed the lawsuit in civil, not criminal court, said Wilson and Chau.
The allegations include Rogers engaged in illegal timber operations by creating 1,000 feet of a new road on his land in the hills without receiving a license or state permit, according to the lawsuit.
A number of the alleged violations of the hazardous waste laws relate to Rogers not having proper precautionary measures in place. For example, failing to implement a plan for emergency response in case of a hazardous material spill. Other alleged violations include he improperly labeled containers with hazardous waste, failed to properly handle used oil, and inadequately maintained an above-ground petroleum storage tank, according to the lawsuit.
Wilson noted complying with these types of regulations can be costly, but skirting the rules is unfair to other law-abiding businesses.
“In many instances it’s not cheap for businesses to comply with environmental regulations,” Wilson said, while adding the majority do abide by the rules. “It’s not fair for an individual or a business to violate environmental laws, cause harm to the environment, endanger public health and not be held to the same standard. Not only does it damage our resources, but it also creates an unfair and un-level playing field.”
If the DA wins where does the money go? I have read stories about how DA's (throughout the state) try to line their department pockets by pursuing cases like this - no different than the lawyers using legal fine print to abuse the ADA laws - trying to enrich themselves by going after restaurants and schools. Its fine to save the environment but ALL of the benefit should go to the PUBLIC,
Its a scary world we live in when government has such an influence on private property and small business with it's ability to make false accusations against it's own taxpaying citizens that can ruin their lively hood and we'll being. It's also sad that a newspaper can write such a biased one sided article based solely on the prosecuters argument and no statement from the defending party except denying all charges. This article would be much more helpful and informative to the public if it were written after the allegations were proven or disproved in court. Until then, this is a far fetched string of lies showing San Mateo county flexing it's muscle on a private land owner who's only wrongdoing is paying taxes to such a tyrannical state. This could happen to any local business or landowner. Take the time to get the facts straight before publishing accusations without proof to back anything up. Newspapers should be full of facts not fictional stories.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
If the DA wins where does the money go? I have read stories about how DA's (throughout the state) try to line their department pockets by pursuing cases like this - no different than the lawyers using legal fine print to abuse the ADA laws - trying to enrich themselves by going after restaurants and schools. Its fine to save the environment but ALL of the benefit should go to the PUBLIC,
Its a scary world we live in when government has such an influence on private property and small business with it's ability to make false accusations against it's own taxpaying citizens that can ruin their lively hood and we'll being. It's also sad that a newspaper can write such a biased one sided article based solely on the prosecuters argument and no statement from the defending party except denying all charges. This article would be much more helpful and informative to the public if it were written after the allegations were proven or disproved in court. Until then, this is a far fetched string of lies showing San Mateo county flexing it's muscle on a private land owner who's only wrongdoing is paying taxes to such a tyrannical state. This could happen to any local business or landowner. Take the time to get the facts straight before publishing accusations without proof to back anything up. Newspapers should be full of facts not fictional stories.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.