Editor,

Local democracy in Burlingame just tilted further toward the wealthy. On Monday evening, a 3-2 majority on the City Council voted to eliminate the local contribution limit for political campaigns. Previously, candidates could raise a maximum of $720 from an individual. Under the new rules, local Burlingame elections will only be bound by the state’s default contribution limit of $4,900 per donor, enabling the wealthiest ones to give nearly seven times as much money going forward.

Whose interests are being served here? Burlingame will be switching to district elections in 2022, so the number of voters any candidate needs to reach is dropping 80%. Why is there any need to increase the contribution limit at all? Wealthy homeowners are more than adequately represented: Burlingame is 52% renters but with zero renters on the council for more than a decade.

The reasons for their yes votes offered by Mayor Ann O’Brien, Vice Mayor Ricardo Ortiz and Councilmember Donna Colson were largely incoherent, seemingly predicated on other cities not having bothered to establish local limits themselves. Colson even suggested that this higher contribution limit would encourage first-time candidates to run.

It’s hard to imagine first-time candidates being less intimidated by needing friends who could afford a $4,900 check instead of a $700 one. The more likely impact is that well-connected candidates will raise lots of money early and discourage other candidates from running.

Sadly, actions like this continue to reinforce some councilmembers’ reputations as failing to “get it” when it comes to equity.

Mike Dunham

Redwood City

Recommended for you

(2) comments

HFAB

Another blatant act of self-interest by the Burlingame City Council. One of them will likely have to go after re-districting takes place. Now that one can find his or her mirror image in another district and give that person loads of money from their canpaign coffers and friends to make sure there will never be representation for the majority ... renters.

willallen

why cap just individual contributions. How about organizations?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!