Editor,

It is with frustration that I read the article titled “Traffic Relief Pilot to Stay in Foster City” in the May 28 issue of the Daily Journal. I was somewhat skeptical of the program from the beginning but was open to what the traffic data showed. What data? There are 229 less cars entering Foster City during peak hours at a cost to the city of $52,000. That’s $227 per car. What we need to know is what percentage decrease in traffic was effected. This is either very poor reporting or very poor press relations on the part of the city. I hope, in either case, it was not deliberate. Lacking sufficient data, it still seems to me that this program punishes the local residents as much as it does to the commuters at a very high cost. Maybe I will change my mind when the data is fully released.

Richard Nishiki-Finley

Foster City

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Terryw

The traffic will be relieved in Foster city when 20,000 people move out and they do not fill the vacant dwellings

damigo2000

Here is the city report with numbers. https://www.fostercity.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/public_works/page/15412/may_20_2019_city_council_staff_report_attachments_on_traffic_relief_pilot_program.pdf

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for reading the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading.Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading.