Mark Simon

It is all about little paper sailboats.

As we fumble our way through an era in which opinions are valued over facts, when dismissing science takes on the tenor of principled defiance and where no one can convince anyone of anything, the viruses that seem to be surging are not limited to COVID. 

Yet, as infections and death tolls rise, we see prominent institutions, most notably the National Football League, announce stern consequences for failing to comply with organizationwide vaccination requirements. Businesses are beginning to implement mandatory vaccination rules. And schools are trying to figure out how to do the same thing.

Can this growing tide of prominent pressure influence a reversal of opinion and behavior among those who, up to now, have refused to get the COVID vaccine?

I put this question to Menlo College political science professor Melissa R. Michelson, who co-authored the book, “Listen, We Need to Talk: How to Change Attitudes about LGBT Rights.” The book, co-authored by Brian F. Harrison, explores the shift in attitudes toward same-sex marriage from widespread opposition to widespread acceptance in an extraordinarily short timeframe. One major factor — a statement by a prominent and admired figure in support of same-sex marriage. In one notable instance, a member of the Green Bay Packers clearly influenced public opinion in Wisconsin.

“While we focused on same-sex marriage and same-sex relationships, our assumption was that it was a broadly applicable theory,” said Michelson, who is a friend and co-hosts an online talk show with me. “If you share an identity with a group, whether you consider yourself a fan of the Green Bay Packers or a Republican or a fan of a particular celebrity, and you hear someone from that group ... express a position you did not previously agree with, you should find yourself reconsidering. Your self-esteem, your identity as a person, is tied to the shared identity of that group.”

It does not mean instant conversion. It is, in the precision of the cliché, food for thought. “It at least gets into your brain,” Michelson said.

As anyone can observe on social media, there are no shortage of people who think one clearly stated posting ought to win the day. That does not do it. It takes a cumulative effort, led by prominent individuals and impactful institutions.

“It’s as if you’re launching a little paper sailboat off the side of the lake, and to change that person’s opinion, the boat has to get all the way to the other side of the lake,” Michelson said. There is no “magical person,” she said, neither, for that matter, no magical combination of words. But “it adds up,” Michelson said. “The more people with whom they identify and with whom they are part of an affinity group, the more likely they are to get to the other side of the lake.”

Incidentally, as Menlo College resumes classes in the fall, all faculty, staff and students will be required to be fully vaccinated.

TWOFER: The Caltrain Board of Directors meets a week from today, but, gee, I guess that will not happen. Directors from San Francisco and Santa Clara counties boycotted the last gathering of the group at a special session to discuss changes in governance. When they were told they may have to pay SamTrans for financing the purchase of Caltrain, the same directors said they could not meet because of the threat of litigation. It’s a made-up threat, but wouldn’t it still exist when the board meets next week? ... As these “big city” politicians insist on having more control over the operation of Caltrain, I keep thinking of a line from a song from 1971: “He can’t even run his own life, I’ll be damned if he’ll run mine.”

A purge appears to be underway at the San Mateo County Community College District, where a number of high-ranking administrative staff were given their walking papers. It looks like the board is trying to erase any remnants of the previous chancellor, Ron Galatolo. … Galatolo has been accused of misusing district funds, and District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe said the investigation into the accusations has concluded. Galatolo’s attorneys asked that they be given the chance “to present us with evidence and/or perspective on his conduct and whether any laws were broken,” Wagstaffe said. He hopes to have this next step completed this summer. … Meanwhile, the college board voted to oust an independent contractor who was running its community-based athletic facilities, and bring it in-house. This, despite a vote against the action by the district Faculty Senate and an independent study showing it would cost the district $2 million. 

 

Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.

 

 

 

Recommended for you

(6) comments

Maxine Terner

Kudos to the new College District Board for questioning the roles and salaries of some of the extremely highly-paid administrative staff. This is not a purge but an elected Board responsibly representing the voters and taxpayers of San Mateo County. Erasing any remnants of the previous chancellor, Ron Galatolo, would be the best thing that could happen to the administration and culture of the College District. Galatolo has been paid a salary of $467,700 for a make-believe position after his firing by the previous Board, has been under investigation for over a year for receiving concert tickets, "high-end travel" and meals from district contractors, and who ran the District without the transparency and accountability expected of public agencies.

Perhaps, Mr. Simon should add the college district's $1.5 billion bond measures to his virus list where disinformation erodes trust in government. The most expensive and extravagant projects built with bond money were never identified in the ballot information, including the new Canada College $120M gymnasium intended to be operated by the same private contractor operating the membership only health club at CSM. Once again, the new College District Board is asking the right questions and Mr. Simon should be one of the "prominent individuals" to start the cumulative effort to recognize, not criticize, their actions.

Mark Simon

Terence Y - I think it’s because the information that doesn’t “toe the line” is also unencumbered by any factual basis.

Terence Y

Mr. Simon – I like the fact you can’t find facts to refute my facts. Meanwhile, VAERS reports processed as of 07/16/2021 show almost 500,000 adverse events due to the jab, including over 6000 deaths, over 7500 life threatening side effects, over 6500 permanent disabilities and almost 27,000 hospitalizations. And let’s not get into the censorship of treatments that supposedly weren’t effective, yet have been proven to be effective in treating COVID (such as hydroxychloroquine with zinc, Ivermectin, Remdesivir). How many deaths were caused due to this information being withheld? How about Democrat governors sending COVID infected seniors back into senior homes to infect and kill more seniors? I guess you think those additional facts are also unencumbered by any factual basis.

markolbert

I hope it doesn’t come to this but I guess if COVID keeps mutating and staying dangerous all the foolishly defiant antivaxxers will either die or become to ill to be a political force. Hardly seems sensible but then again neither does opposing use of the vaccines.

Terence Y

Hey Mr. Nagler, if you’re out there reading comments, we can add another name to the list of people who don’t want to nurture their dissimilar heart. Hardly seems possible, but then again not everyone seems to understand that if COVID keeps mutating and staying dangerous, even vaxxed folks (I’ll let you decide whether they’re foolishly jabbed) have the same chance of being infected (to wit the Delta variant). BTW, Mr. Olbert - current vaccines are not 100% effective, so you’re not just wishing ill on the unjabbed, but everyone. On a positive note, you’re not being discriminatory.

Terence Y

Unfortunately, Mr. Simon, when the CDC coordinates with Facebook in targeting and removing information that doesn’t toe the CDC propaganda line, it brings into question whether this so-called curated information is credible. When Twitter begins censoring tweeters they don’t agree with, it brings into question their credibility. When the lamestream media, already proven to be adept at fake news and lies, keeps parroting the same message, is it any wonder people question the value of the jab? When the CDC tells jabbed folks to wear their masks indoors and out, similar to unjabbed folks, what can one think of the effectiveness of the jab? When PCR tests cannot tell the difference between COVID and the flu, what can one think of these supposed skyrocketing COVID cases, or these supposed deaths attributed to COVID? Sorry, but prominent pressure will not influence a reversal of opinion. Fake news and social media sites have made their beds – now they must lie in it. Pun intended. BTW, if we’re supposed to wear masks, why was bumbling Biden mingling with maskless folks during his recent visit to PA? One day after the CDC said vaccinated folks should wear masks. Hypocrisy abounds!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!