The San Mateo City Council cited inevitable divisiveness as a key reason not to move forward on a resolution advocating for a cease-fire between Israel and Palestine, though Deputy Mayor Rob Newsom said he would support a general proclamation of peace.
Dozens of public commenters packed into City Hall Monday, March 4, many of them urging councilmembers to discuss in the near future a resolution advocating for a cease-fire. Others voiced their opposition, claiming it would not only be inconsequential but would sow discord and even engender antisemitic backlash.
The issue was not on the council agenda, meaning councilmembers were not obligated to vote nor further address the topic, but they took up the matter at the end of the roughly five-hour meeting, with most stating that moving forward on such a measure would inflame divisive rhetoric.
“I heard so much divide here tonight, and in some cases, some anger back and forth. I think that doing something like this adds to the divide. It’s something that we have absolutely no control over,” Councilmember Rich Hedges said.
Newsom, who said he personally supported a cease-fire, ultimately opposed such a resolution, stating it would exacerbate tensions, as evidenced by the recent bullying of his daughters, who are half Palestinian-American, as well as the taunting of his friends’ Jewish children.
“The way to root out the Hamas terrorist organization of Palestine is to make sure all people are free and have access to work and safety and food and all the amenities free people should have, and a voice in society. At the same time, I support the immediate release of the 130 Israelis that are still being held hostage, and that should be a condition of any cease-fire,” he said, adding that he would be in favor of a more general proclamation of peace. “San Mateo has absolutely no tolerance for anti-Arab, antisemitism or Islamophobia. We need to work together to replace our anger with dialogue.”
Discourse remained civil throughout most of the meeting, though one commenter spoke out after Newsom’s remarks, condemning his choice not to agendize a resolution.
Numerous cities throughout the Bay Area have discussed passing such resolutions over the last few months, with the San Bruno and Foster City councils ultimately rejecting requests to add it to future agendas. San Francisco and Oakland have passed cease-fire-related resolutions in the last several months, and South San Francisco indicated support for one during last week’s council meeting. On Monday, March 4, San Mateo County Board of Supervisor Noelia Corzo, who represents District 2, proposed a resolution at the San Mateo Medical Center Board declaring support for health care workers in Gaza. Supervisor David Canepa said he was against the measure but, with seven other board members abstaining, there was no vote.
One of the, if not the, best San Mateo City Council decisions made that I can remember. Now let’s get to the local business at hand. Instead of listening to a small minority of folks yelling loudly, let’s listen to the majority of people speaking softly, but wielding majority voting power, and do stuff the City Council does have control over. If needed, give the minority of folks wanting a cease-fire resolution a 5 minute recess to go outside and scream at the sky.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
One of the, if not the, best San Mateo City Council decisions made that I can remember. Now let’s get to the local business at hand. Instead of listening to a small minority of folks yelling loudly, let’s listen to the majority of people speaking softly, but wielding majority voting power, and do stuff the City Council does have control over. If needed, give the minority of folks wanting a cease-fire resolution a 5 minute recess to go outside and scream at the sky.
Spot on. Why any local municipality would give any of their attention to a cease-fire resolution is beyond me.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.