Daily Journal local education generic logo

After more than one year of mostly shuttered campuses amid the pandemic, San Mateo County Community College District officials generally agreed that a swifter approach should be taken to allowing students back.

The district Board of Trustees indicated during a meeting Wednesday, May 12, that a more immediate return to campus should be allowed than the previously adopted plan to bring students back in the spring semester of next year.

While no formal decision was made during the meeting, a majority of the board instructed Chancellor Michael Claire and the rest of the administration to ramp up the process for reopening campuses to more students.

“We need to be offering much more access to in-person instruction than is in the current plan,” board Vice President Richard Holober said.

Holober has bolstered his position on reopening by noting that community colleges throughout the state have lost student enrollment during the pandemic, and a recent study showed the local school district is no exception.

Overall enrollment among resident students dipped from 48,247 in spring 2019 to 46,536 in spring 2020, which amounts to an overall drop of 10.4%, according to a district report. The enrollment declines were most precipitous among low-income and international students, which dropped 46% and 22% respectively.

Noting the critical role the district plays in accommodating low-income students who rely on the district not only for education, but a variety of other support services, Holober urged officials to move rapidly in reopening campuses.

“I’m very concerned,” he said, regarding the enrollment dip.

According to a survey of district students, a majority expressed comfort with the idea of returning to campus, so long as vaccination is widespread, masks are worn, social distance is kept and other safety protocol is followed.

While campuses are not entirely shuttered, capacity is near 5% and the administration’s reopening plan calls for bringing back about 15% students in the fall semester. Looking to spring, administrators plan to reopen campuses entirely and also mandate vaccine for students and staffers planning to regularly attend schools.

Before campuses are reopened entirely, officials plan to gradually phase in student services, the bookstore and food services because those programs were identified by students as the biggest void while away from sites.

The student perspective regarding comfort with returning to campus differed from district teachers and staffers, who a few months ago generally disagreed with the reopening plan.

During the most recent meeting, some staffers shared their fears with the idea of reopening, specifically in antiquated buildings with poor ventilation systems. What’s more, they shared frustration with being left out of the plans laying the groundwork for reopening.

“Faculty wants to be a part of the conversation. We don’t want to be told what we are doing,” Katherine Harer, a member of the district’s teacher union, said.

Trustee Maurice Goodman shared frustration that some central figures in the school district feel like they were ignored in the planning process.

“It’s very disheartening to hear the thoughts and concerns that we are hearing of those that were not at the table,” he said.

While most officials favored the accelerated reopening plan, board President Thomas Nuris deferred to the recommendation of administrators who preferred to keep the previous approach in place.

“I think that the people that are dealing with this for us are extremely qualified, much more qualified than me,” he said.

For his part, Nuris said he wanted to assure that any plan the district makes is the safest for students, teachers, faculty and everyone visiting campuses.

In response to the instruction from a majority of the board, Claire said he would take the feedback into consideration. But he said those perspectives must be balanced thoughtfully against the reservations raised by teachers and faculty.

“This is a very difficult situation,” he said.

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Maxine Terner

Kudos to the Trustees for pushing to reopen college district classes and the campuses sooner than the administration recommended. This incredibly well-funded institution needs to come off of their hilltop bubbles and better serve their mission. A few key points for the taxpaying public to think about:

1)  Beware of administrative spin and inconsistent data about "enrollment." The 46,536 number is grossly misleading. The state uses full-time equivalent (FTE) students to compare enrollments. According to college data provided to the state, during the spring 2019 to spring 2020 period, FTE enrollment dropped from 8723 to 4604 students. 

2) Why are faculty concerned about "antiquated buildings with poor ventilation systems?" Updating academic buildings was the reason taxpayers gave the District more than $1.5 billion in bond money during the past decade. Did faculty raise these issues when the administration was spending hundreds of million dollars on membership only health clubs?

3) Trustee Nuris should reread the job description for elected officials. The previous Board's rubber-stamping of administrative proposals is why the District has strayed so far from its important educational mission. Again kudos to the new Board majority who are asking the right questions! 


It is safe right now to reopen, and community college students deserve better than have their education undercut. Let's value the futures of these young people and put them first.


I don't think those numbers have been reported correctly.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!