SMC Sheriff Deputy...Sex in Courthouse...why not.

[Michael Stogner]

This is what we can expect under the leadership of Greg Munks and Carlos Bolanos. This is what some Deputies think of our Courts.
They think it is their playground.

Lets have the names pelase.

http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=77743

[mrs.frankb]

Michael! How can you even compare the two - the naked deputy
obviously wasn't trolling for underage partners...

[Lil Ol' Me]

agreed upon liason is hardly worth comparing to Sheriff Munk and a trip to a brothel. A please, let's not even use the word "some" deputies...it was ONE deputy.

[Marko]

That's a total stretch, M. Stogner...are you saying that Munks/Bolanos allow such activity as a matter of course, or implicitly endorse such behavior?

Your haste to tar them gives reasonable minds great pause.

[Michael Stogner]

Michael! How can you even compare the two - the naked deputy
obviously wasn't trolling for underage partners...

You are so right......These were two consenting adults.....big difference.

Also using our Court Room on the 8th floor for sex is much nicer then a single family residence with trailers in the back.

Is it legal to have sex in a Court room in San Mateo County?

Has a crime even been committed? or is this just another case of bad judgement by a San Mateo County Deputy?

[Michael Stogner]

That's a total stretch, M. Stogner...are you saying that Munks/Bolanos allow such activity as a matter of course, or implicitly endorse such behavior?

Your haste to tar them gives reasonable minds great pause.

Marko, what does your reasonable mind tell you about Munks and Bolanos being inside a residential house at 9:30PM April 21, 2007?

endorse this behavior... they got caught themselves.... as customers

remember......just a couple of months ago.....

[Michael Stogner]

agreed upon liason is hardly worth comparing to Sheriff Munk and a trip to a brothel. A please, let's not even use the word "some" deputies...it was ONE deputy.

This time it was one Deputy, I'll give you that.

Location, Location, Location

[mrs.frankb]

Maybe the deputy was experiencing some physical ailment that required him to have a massage - or maybe he was just cooling off from the recent heatwave. Or, maybe he feels unappreciated and would put his clothes back on if we offered him a low interest home loan.

[Marko]

Marko, what does your reasonable mind tell you about Munks and Bolanos being inside a residential house at 9:30PM April 21, 2007?

endorse this behavior... they got caught themselves.... as customers

remember......just a couple of months ago.....

My mind tells me there is no nexus between L'Affaire du Vegas and an allegedly horny deputy risking his job by getting frisky in the courthouse.

We know that what Munks/Bolanos did is a cherished event for you (Controversy! Throw the bums out!), but trying to extend the branch of that allegedly poisoned tree to this fruit is too much...IMHO

[Michael Stogner]

My mind tells me there is no nexus between L'Affaire du Vegas and an allegedly horny deputy risking his job by getting frisky in the courthouse.

We know that what Munks/Bolanos did is a cherished event for you (Controversy! Throw the bums out!), but trying to extend the branch of that allegedly poisoned tree to this fruit is too much...IMHO

Marko, I didn't say there was a nexus. San Mateo County allows this behavior.

CALIFORNIA
Ex-Deputy Charged With Sex In Jail

Male guard in women's unit could get 6 1/2 years

Julie N. Lynem, Chronicle Staff Writer

Friday, March 26, 1999

©1999 San Francisco Chronicle

The San Mateo County district attorney's office charged a former sheriff's deputy yesterday with having sex with an inmate and bringing alcohol into the women's jail, after a monthlong investigation.

Willard Kelley, 56, had a sexual encounter with the 32-year-old woman on the morning of February 4 at the Women's Correctional Center in Redwood City, authorities said. A 28-year veteran, Kelley resigned in lieu of termination last month after allegations of misconduct surfaced.

The district attorney's office charged Kelley, who was on duty at the time of the encounter, with two felony counts and one misdemeanor.

The felony charges allege Kelley brought alcohol into the jail and allowed an inmate to perform oral sex on him. The misdemeanor alleges that he engaged in consensual sex with an inmate.

If convicted, he could be sentenced to prison for as long as 6 1/2 years.

``We're certain that this is an isolated incident,'' said Undersheriff Greg Munks. ``This is an extremely unusual occurrence. We haven't had something like this in 10 years.''

Kelley's attorney, Joshua Bentley, said yesterday that he will reserve his comments for the courtroom. He did say that he and Kelley were working out the terms of Kelley's surrender to authorities.

The woman, who was in custody on theft and credit card fraud charges, had also attempted an escape on January 7. She has been moved to jail in Alameda County the request of her attorney, who did not return calls yesterday.

Sheriff's detectives found out about the February 4 incident after the woman scaled a 12-foot fence and escaped from the center, Munks said.

The same day, the woman was apprehended in San Mateo. During a meeting with investigators, the inmate said Kelley had sexually assaulted her in her cell on February 4. She also said Kelley had taken her outside to one of the center's enclosed recreation areas for a cigarette shortly before 4 a.m. on February 14.

``There are conflicting accounts,'' Munks said. ``He claims she came on to him. She claims that he initiated it and came to her door.''

No inmates or other deputies said they knew anything about the February 4 incident, which took place during Kelley's 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. shift.

Munks said the sexual encounter happened behind the cell door and would not have been easily seen by other inmates. At the time, two other deputies were on duty but were working in different parts of the facility.

However, during interviews with Kelley and the woman, investigators concluded that a sexual incident had indeed taken place. From the beginning, Munks said, sheriff's detectives were suspicious about the circumstances of the woman's escape.

``There were some red flags,'' he said.

There also was a cup filled with bourbon that investigators found inside the woman's cell, which led authorities to believe that Kelley had been there that morning, Munks said. Although Kelley took and passed a polygraph test, he later admitted having sex with the woman and throwing a bottle of alcohol away.

Sheriff's officials said yesterday that they were disappointed that a deputy had broken the law and violated department procedures. But Munks said most officers obey the rules. At the Women's Correctional Center, 20 deputies -- half of them male -- guard female inmates, Munks said.

One female deputy is always is on duty in case an inmate needs to be strip-searched, he said.

Karen Shain, administrative director of Legal Services for Prisoners With Children, said such an arrangement is not nearly sufficient. Although sexual relations between guards and inmates is not something that happens every day, having large numbers of male guards around females in custody can spell trouble.

Carlos Ordonez the 23 year old San Mateo County Probation Department Employee caught having sex with a 15 year old female ward of Hillcrest.

San Mateo County settles case $1,900,000 for illegal strip searches of women at our mens jail.....

Munks and Bolanos caught in an Illegal Brothel with human trafficking.

Sheriff Deputies having sex in the Jail building.

[George Spelvin]

San Mateo County allows this behavior.

You make a statement like that, and your evidence in support of the assertion is a story about a deputy being criminally charged?

I think we should find whoever it is who reminds you to breathe, and distract him for about three minutes.

[Michael Stogner]

http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?type=opinions&id=77889

[mrs.frankb]

The Vegas incident was not some college-boy prank. It was two highly paid law enforcement officials who decided to seek out the sexual favors of underaged sex slaves. They got caught. Their employees now have no respect for their leadership and discipline is falling apart...as long as Munks is at the helm, this type of thing will happen...or, put more simply - when leadership is weakened - followers will frolic.

[Michael Stogner]

That's a total stretch, M. Stogner...are you saying that Munks/Bolanos allow such activity as a matter of course, or implicitly endorse such behavior?

Your haste to tar them gives reasonable minds great pause.

Sheriff Greg Munks, doesn't even know if this is inapropriate..... of course he wouldn't know...

“We did get a complaint about one of our employees after hours of potentially inappropriate behavior,” Munks said.

What about illegal conduct? Steve Wagstaffe said nobody asked the District Attorneys Office to investigate it. Who does Steve Wagstaffe think is going to ask him to Investigate this incident?

[jonvn]

It was two highly paid law enforcement officials who decided to seek out the sexual favors of underaged sex slaves.

You say this as if there was something bad about that.

[mrs.frankb]

I'm going to asume you were trying to be funny - it wasn't.

[jonvn]

Actually, it was meant as sarcasm.

[Michael Stogner]

You say this as if there was something bad about that.

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=27149

[mrs.frankb]

[QUOTE=jonvn]Actually, it was meant as sarcasm.[/QUOTe
Got it! Sorry I snapped!

[jonvn]

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=27149


So, you posted this link why?

[Michael Stogner]

So, you posted this link why?

Jonvn, were you able to read the link, if you did read it, I think you know why I posted it.

It had to do with Operation Doll House on April 21, 2007 Las Vegas our two Sheriff's.

[jonvn]

I saw it. Looks like the story of sex slavery here in the United States, which has a long history, especially in this area.

I didn't read the whole thing. I know about such things already.

Is there some salient passage that is in there that I should know about as it relates to the San Mateo Sheriff? Or did you just want to inform me that this sort of thing goes on in general?

The article is a tirade against the sex worker industry. If it weren't needlessly illegal, then the element of criminality would be removed from it, and these women would be in a far better position. But we have criminalized the entire thing in the last 80 years or so, and have made nothing better for anyone.