PDA

View Full Version : reply to weekend Kreitman/King op ed


Mike Caggiano
08-02-2006, 08:29 PM
Response to Karen King and Keith Kreitman July 31 ‘06



Republican spokeswoman Karen King (Weekend Journal July 29/30) has done herself proud once again. She has echoed perfectly the right wing ideologues who are hobbling any reappraisal of our out of control foreign and domestic policies. Referring to George Bush’s ‘understanding the dangers of Islamofascism’, ( a pop term coined by the Fox News crowd), she totally overlooks the dangers to us posed by the standard type ‘Corporate Fascists’ in the forms of the Delays, Abramoffs, Gingrichs, and other various and sundry Neo-Cons that populate the White House and Capitol. Indeed it is an administration of and for the unholy alliance of multinational corporations and their Military and ‘Intelligence’ counterparts that are eroding our Bill of Rights and consequently Western Civilization. This process is making the world safe for a kind of democracy with a very small ‘d’. One where they own our media and political process and use them to send our youth out in military formations to secure the minerals and markets for these Captains of Industry much as was done for the last century.
Keith Kreitman’s column which took up the rest of the page states that ‘Realpolitik trumps Idealism any day’. He puts his finger on the source of our problems nicely. It is this very ‘Realpolitik’ that got us into our predicament in the first place. By believing that our oil resides under other people’s sand, he justifies the disposal of other people’s governments. This we did in 1953 when we overthrew the elected Iranian government to be replaced by a medieval ‘Shah’ who would prove to be more ‘reliable’ for our Captains of Industry in their competition with the Soviet Union. We proved to Iran’s citizens that our idea of a good government is far more important then theirs (how to win hearts and minds).
Realpolitik reared its head again when we stoked the Taliban types with money and weapons in order to defeat the Russians who had entered Afghanistan to aid the head of state who was trying to combat of all things Islamic Fundamentalism which was threatening Russia’s border provinces.
Likewise on the statement that while balancing adultery and government Bill Clinton overlooked the possibilities of global terrorism we again differ. In fact it was the Republicans who brought the intelligent running of government to a screeching halt whilst they could fully savor the matter of the blue dress etc.
The matters of the Mid East and Israel might better be viewed through the lense of the many Israeli websites such as Yesh Gvul.org, Gush Shalom.org, Btselem.org, Taayush.org as well as the local variety, jewishvoiceforpeace.org and Tikkun.org to see that Progressives (Lefties are out now) hardly blame anything other than shortsightedness and near term expediency (that Realpolitik again) lacking any moral horizon for the present conflict. The unconditional support for the Israeli right wing in its colonial occupation of the West Bank and Jerusalem while cruelly oppressing the native population is the direct link to the creation of Hamas and Hezbollah in the first place.
Seventeen thousand Lebanese paid the ultimate price for the brutal invasion of 1982. With Israel and its ‘Christian’ allies rampaging through the country, local Shiites needed to find a way to protect themselves and so Hezbollah was born (talk about unintended consequences).
The good news is that Israel is demanding the enactment of UN resolution 1559 to ensure that the official Lebanese army patrols the border with a disarmed militia. Of course we need to see this interest in enforcing UN resolutions extended to the 63 that have to do with Israel and its relations to its native population (the Palestinians). They must be allowed to either return or be compensated. The ‘settlements’ must be evacuated and sovereignty granted to a viable Palestine with all the surrounding states recognizing the permanent borders.
The Geneva Accord of three years ago forged by moderate Israelis and Palestinians shows the viability of negotiations taken in good faith. Unfortunately Colin Powell supported them with nothing more than a literal pat on the back. I don’t think our civilization can stand much more Realpolitik without ending our real world.
The one paragraph of Ms. King’s with which I wholeheartedly agree is the phrase from Dante: “The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crises.” If we want to fight the forces of darkness, we had better shine more light on the Machiavellian Neo Cons who want to continue our slide toward Fascism while we totally alienate the rest of the planet.


Mike Caggiano

Roscoe_Beedle
08-02-2006, 11:00 PM
To the simple-minded and the socialist-utopians it's always: USA = BAD.

If the Shah was "medevil" then those mullahs and ayatollahs are pre-jurrasic. And the old and tired oil argument. If we stopped buying oil over there (we're down to 25% of our needs from the middle east) those countries would still sell it off to the next buyer.

Do a bit more homework. The middle east was a hornet's nest from the beginning. Ancient hatreds, religious zealots, and despotic rulers are the order of the day over there. But you and the other elitist pondits have it all figured out. It's all our fault. And israel's.

GHafez7
08-03-2006, 05:41 PM
To the simple-minded and the socialist-utopians it's always: USA = BAD.

If the Shah was "medevil" then those mullahs and ayatollahs are pre-jurrasic. And the old and tired oil argument. If we stopped buying oil over there (we're down to 25% of our needs from the middle east) those countries would still sell it off to the next buyer.

Do a bit more homework. The middle east was a hornet's nest from the beginning. Ancient hatreds, religious zealots, and despotic rulers are the order of the day over there. But you and the other elitist pondits have it all figured out. It's all our fault. And israel's.

Let me give you advice Roscoe...completely ignore Mike Caggiano, if you read the SMDJ you will know that he doesn't konw what he's talking about when it comes to the middle east. he's an appologist for terrorists and muslims all over the world. If he had grown in a similar situation as I did he would not have such radical ideas.

Tedriii
08-14-2006, 10:02 PM
Wednesday
August
02
2006



San Mateo Daily Journal

Home
Local News
State / National / World
Sports
Opinion / Letters
Business
Arts / Entertainment
Lifestyle
Obituaries
Calendar
Designers
Community Forum
Archives


Letters


President George W. Bush understands the scope?


Editor,


This is regarding the statement “President George W. Bush understands the scope of the worldwide assault on freedom posed by the Islamofascists,” by Karen King, chair of the San Mateo County Republican Party, in her guest perspective in the July 29 edition of the Daily Journal.


And those who call themselves Christians and loudly proclaim their love of him, but then even more loudly beat the drums of war and rain death and destruction on the innocent while at the same time filling the coffers of their masters and cronies with the profits of war, make him name and those who are called by him name to stink in the nostrils of the world. These do abominable works in him name, and so do more to hamper him cause than those who actively fight him. These shall reap the wrath of both man and God for their hypocrisy and wickedness.


That statement is why she is so ignorant about of the rest of the world. And so the United States has done much to destroy any peace.

Ted Rudow III,MA
Menlo Park