View Full Version : Dr. William Ayres Arrested.
Michael Stogner
04-06-2007, 10:20 AM
Best of luck to all the victims and there families, and to all the citizens who had the courage to speak out against this well known and well-respected Dr.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73214
Michael Stogner
04-06-2007, 10:27 AM
Best of luck to all the victims and there families, and to all the citizens who had the courage to speak out against this well known and well-respected Dr.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73214
I forgot to say GREAT JOB to the San Mateo Police Department on this case.
nitamac
04-06-2007, 12:22 PM
I forgot to say GREAT JOB to the San Mateo Police Department on this case.It is not the san mateo police department that made this arrest happen!
silverfarb
04-06-2007, 12:57 PM
The important thing is that this man was arrested and the public will now have the opportunity to realize that someone praised for his work with children may have actually been a sex predator. If the charges are true this man should never see the light of day again. It's one of the worst cases of alleged molestation I have ever heard.
nitamac
04-06-2007, 03:21 PM
The important thing is that this man was arrested and the public will now have the opportunity to realize that someone praised for his work with children may have actually been a sex predator. If the charges are true this man should never see the light of day again. It's one of the worst cases of alleged molestation I have ever heard.Yes you are right, if not for Vicki's hard work for the last 5 years He would not be sitting in jail right now! Give credit were credit is due!
Michael Stogner
04-06-2007, 04:21 PM
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ayres6apr06,1,352958.story?ctrack=1&cset=true
Michael Stogner
04-06-2007, 04:26 PM
http://www.mercurynews.com/search/ci_5609491?nclick_check=1
Michael Stogner
04-07-2007, 08:06 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73311
This is one of the reasons our children are not protected in San Mateo County.
This is the same Judge who Abused his discreation according to the Appellate Court in the Edith Delgado. He raised her bail to $3,000,000 without the prosecutor asking for it.
Now he reduces bail for Dr. William Ayres from $1,500.000.00 to $250,000.00
Dr. William Ayres told the victims "No one will believe you."
Judge Thomas McGinn Smith has just verified he was right.
Welcome to San Mateo County
Michael Stogner
04-07-2007, 04:36 PM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/ci_5616617
Roscoe_Beedle
04-07-2007, 06:26 PM
What is also amazing about this story is that there were complaints made years ago and seemingly nothing happened.
I also sit in amazement that everytime we have one of these cases the victims say nothing until well into adult hood. I know when I was a child, if anyone had done anything like this to me I would have shot my mouth off for al, to hear. My oldest brother would have baseball'd batted this guy probably to death. If my father was alive at the time he would have done it with a pipe.
I am not demeaning the act or the victim here. But how can this happen? Silence like this. Kids maybe have to be reminded to speak with their parents about everything.
I really don't know the answer. For children to be so afraid to say anything.
Michael Stogner
04-07-2007, 07:05 PM
What is also amazing about this story is that there were complaints made years ago and seemingly nothing happened.
I also sit in amazement that everytime we have one of these cases the victims say nothing until well into adult hood. I know when I was a child, if anyone had done anything like this to me I would have shot my mouth off for al, to hear. My oldest brother would have baseball'd batted this guy probably to death. If my father was alive at the time he would have done it with a pipe.
I am not demeaning the act or the victim here. But how can this happen? Silence like this. Kids maybe have to be reminded to speak with their parents about everything.
I really don't know the answer. For children to be so afraid to say anything.
Roscoe
These kids have been speaking for many years, and their parents have been reporting for many years. This case was no secret to James P. Fox or Steve Wagstaffe or many people in Law Enforcement.
We San Mateo County has let these people down.
Roscoe_Beedle
04-07-2007, 09:34 PM
Someone let down these kids. I bet there are people running for cover right now.
Michael, myself I have always been against school psyhcologists. Too many behavioral acts are judged to be some deep rooted this or that nonsense. These district psychologists have a license to steal in my opinion. And to warp young minds.
nitamac
04-07-2007, 10:03 PM
What is also amazing about this story is that there were complaints made years ago and seemingly nothing happened.
I also sit in amazement that everytime we have one of these cases the victims say nothing until well into adult hood. I know when I was a child, if anyone had done anything like this to me I would have shot my mouth off for al, to hear. My oldest brother would have baseball'd batted this guy probably to death. If my father was alive at the time he would have done it with a pipe.
I am not demeaning the act or the victim here. But how can this happen? Silence like this. Kids maybe have to be reminded to speak with their parents about everything.
I really don't know the answer. For children to be so afraid to say anything.Ayres knew how to pick his victoms, he made it his job! most of the boy are in prison now who are they going to tell in prison? thank about it! One of his victims has commited suicide.
Michael Stogner
04-08-2007, 10:22 AM
I have not mentioned Victoria name before because she had asked me not to.
I just received this e-mail giving me permission.
I agree with Nita 100% that if it were not for Victoria ......not the Police and Not the District Attorney's Office, there would not be a current case against Dr. Ayres.
Here is the e-mail:
It is now OK for Nita MacDonald to mention my name on
your post. She is right - it is I who found the
victims, found the evidence that the San Mateo PD used
to get their search warrant in March 2006. And it is I
who got this current police investigation going after
one of the victims I had befriended died of a possible
suicide after telling me that no one in San Mateo -
not the police or anyone - was going to help the Ayres
victims. That is when I contacted Captain Mike
Callagy. All Callagy did was tell me that the victim
was "now at peace." This was in November 2005 and
there was absolutely no active police investigation.
They did not actively look for victims - I did, and
they asked me to turn over any names I found... But
when Captain Callagy said the victim was "at peace"I
got angry and emailed him that none of the victims
would be at peace until the police did something to
find new victims. That's when he asked me to prepare
documents on the victims and Ayres so they could get
their search warrant. I have been told by the police,
and the DA's office that if it were not for my
efforts, this case would not have happened.
The Associated Press did mention my efforts briefly in
a story a couple of days ago. So if Nita MacDonald now
wants to give me a little credit, please allow her to.
I have decided it is OK now.
Thanks, Victoria
I say THANK YOU your are a HERO
Michael Stogner
Michael Stogner
04-09-2007, 06:48 PM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_5616612
It will be interesting to find out how many times Thomas Casey III was notified of the abuse allegations.
note: UNFOUNDED is the common response authorities give to a complaint for sexual abuse.
Michael Stogner
04-10-2007, 09:01 AM
Hon. Judge Thomas Smith doesn't think Dr. William Ayres is a flight risk.
Lets think about this a little bit.
Dr. Ayres has been investigated since 2002. The same year San Mateo County gave him an award.
He knows there are 21 men ready to testify against him.
He has already settled a similar civil suit.
He recently SELLS HIS HOUSE.
Does he buy another house in San Mateo County?
The Judge reduces his $1,500,000 bail to $250,000.00...That makes sense.
The same Judge abused his authority in the Edith Delgado case.
He raised her bail from $300,000 to $3,000,0000.
Why would a 75 year old man with plenty of cash think about leaving the country???????
nitamac
04-10-2007, 12:53 PM
Hon. Judge Thomas Smith doesn't think Dr. William Ayres is a flight risk.
Lets think about this a little bit.
Dr. Ayres has been investigated since 2002. The same year San Mateo County gave him an award.
He knows there are 21 men ready to testify against him.
He has already settled a similar civil suit.
He recently SELLS HIS HOUSE.
Does he buy another house in San Mateo County?
The Judge reduces his $1,500,000 bail to $250,000.00...That makes sense.
The same Judge abused his authority in the Edith Delgado case.
He raised her bail from $300,000 to $3,000,0000.
Why would a 75 year old man with plenty of cash think about leaving the country???????
Sounds like the Judge is protecting him?
Michael Stogner
04-10-2007, 06:47 PM
Sounds like the Judge is protecting him?
Hon. Judge Thomas Smith IS protecting Dr. William Ayres.
What is the name of the first Judge who placed bail at $1,500,000.00?
This trial should be moved out of San Mateo County......Now
There is no way a fair trial can exist in this County. There are to many friends of the defendant in high places as the Hon. Thomas Smith has just demonstrated.
He is the same judge who abused his discretion in the Edith Delgado case by raising her bail to $3,000,000.00 from $300,000.
nitamac
04-11-2007, 12:41 AM
The county should have never sent another child to this "CHO-MO" after knowing he was accused of Molesting children they are just as guilty as the doctor i feel. This just showed me what i have felt is true about San mateo Juvenile system they just do not give a F__k about our young boys they just rather throw them in prison! That is why are prisons are so over crowded County's like San Mateo making money on our children being housed by them.
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 10:29 AM
The county should have never sent another child to this "CHO-MO" after knowing he was accused of Molesting children they are just as guilty as the doctor i feel. This just showed me what i have felt is true about San mateo Juvenile system they just do not give a F__k about our young boys they just rather throw them in prison! That is why are prisons are so over crowded County's like San Mateo making money on our children being housed by them.
Nita,
Don't forget about the Girls.
They don't give a F. About our CHILDREN PERIOD. BOYS and GIRLS
The Grand Jury recommended more open Courts...Which I say will help protect our children. County Manager John Maltbie ignored that recommendation.
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 10:56 AM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_5616612
It will be interesting to find out how many times Thomas Casey III was notified of the abuse allegations.
note: UNFOUNDED is the common response authorities give to a complaint for sexual abuse.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/07/MNGTTP4OGV1.DTL&type=printable
In this article San Mateo County Counsel Thomas Casey III said he couldn't
comment on how the County handled earlier compliants against Dr. Ayres.
Why Not? His office doesn't or shouldn't represent Dr. William Ayres.
He represents the San Mateo County Employees, and elected Officials.
He does not represent the Children.
Why can't he just say he did nothing to protect our children.
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 11:31 AM
Court Room 4A Today at 1:30 PM
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 01:04 PM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?type=opinions&id=73438
No mention of Victoria...was that a typo?
Editor Jon Mays and Publisher Jerry Lee are completely aware of her DILIGENCE in this investigation.
Without Victoria there is no Dr. William Ayres case PERIOD!
On behalf of the ordinary citizens of San Mateo County,
Thank You, Victoria
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 01:42 PM
Dr. William Hamilton Ayres was released from Maguire Correctional Facility about 2PM Monday April 9, 2007.
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 03:53 PM
Today the Attorney General filed a motion and it was not objected to.
Net result is Dr. William Ayres can not practice in the State of California as of today.
Next Court appearance April 12, 2007 1:30 PM Court Room 4A
Additional Charges and Bail Increase motions.
Michael Stogner
04-11-2007, 05:15 PM
Hon. Judge Thomas Smith doesn't think Dr. William Ayres is a flight risk.
Lets think about this a little bit.
Dr. Ayres has been investigated since 2002. The same year San Mateo County gave him an award.
He knows there are 21 men ready to testify against him.
He has already settled a similar civil suit.
He recently SELLS HIS HOUSE.
Does he buy another house in San Mateo County?
The Judge reduces his $1,500,000 bail to $250,000.00...That makes sense.
The same Judge abused his authority in the Edith Delgado case.
He raised her bail from $300,000 to $3,000,0000.
Why would a 75 year old man with plenty of cash think about leaving the country???????
Dr. William Ayres sold his personal residence 10/12/05 within 90 days of settling his civil case around July 14, 2005. His net proceeds from sale around $1,900,000.00 minus cost to settle......who knows what is left.
He does not own any real estate in San Mateo County as of today.
Flight Risk......I think So.
Michael Stogner
04-12-2007, 09:10 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73473
Dr. William Ayres and his attorney Jim Collins have not reached an agreement yet. Yesterday Jim Collins announced to the court that he was there as a special appearance. he also stated that he would not be in court today but he would try to find ssomenone to represent the Dr.
Sounds like some financial details need to be worked out.
Michael Stogner
04-12-2007, 04:01 PM
Dr. William Ayres just had 2 more victims added to his case and 4 more counts added.
The Bail Hearing will be heard tomorrow
9:00 AM by Hon. Judge Carl Holm
Attorney Philip Barnett made a special appearance today for Dr. Ayres.
Michael Stogner
04-13-2007, 11:35 AM
Dr. William Ayres bail was raised today to $750,000.00
OnbekendeBron
04-13-2007, 12:03 PM
Dr. William Ayres bail was raised today to $750,000.00
Thanks for keeping this posting so current. You're faster than the news services, for those of us watching with baited breath.
Michael Stogner
04-13-2007, 12:59 PM
Attorney Philip Barnett appeared today as a special appearance only for Dr. William Ayres...after a private meeting with the Judge...sidebar....
Attorney Barnett reported to the court that he would not be able to represent Dr. Ayres in any future proceedings because he had repesented a victim of Dr. Ayres in a prior case...conflict of interest. WOW
He and Dr. Ayres agreed that he could represent the Dr. in the Bail Hearing today. He did...Bail increased to $750,000.00 by Judge Carl Holm.
neverforget
04-13-2007, 02:42 PM
Attorney Philip Barnett appeared today as a special appearance only for Dr. William Ayres...after a private meeting with the Judge...sidebar....
Attorney Barnett reported to the court that he would not be able to represent Dr. Ayres in any future proceedings because he had repesented a victim of Dr. Ayres in a prior case...conflict of interest. WOW
He and Dr. Ayres agreed that he could represent the Dr. in the Bail Hearing today. He did...Bail increased to $750,000.00 by Judge Carl Holm.
There should of been a no bail if you ask me, i am sure a lot of others in our community feel the same!
neverforget
04-13-2007, 03:41 PM
Who is to blame for sending children to Dr. Ayres after a “child” victim reported abuse to the police department back in 1970s. Why would anybody even think about taking the risk of another child being abused? There job was to look after these children. Parents trusted these individuals to make good choices, choices that were in the best interest of there children. I say there are a whole lot of individuals that are to blame for this happening. I feel someone has some explaining to do; they owe it to the victims and there parents as well as the community! It appears people are hiding from the fact that someone allowed this to happen. What Judge or Probation Officer at Juvenile hall ordered these victims to be seen by Dr. Ayres?
Michael Stogner
04-13-2007, 04:33 PM
There should of been a no bail if you ask me, i am sure a lot of others in our community feel the same!
Even Judge Carl Holm brought the subject of No Bail Status in this case.
Michael Stogner
04-13-2007, 04:51 PM
Attorney Philip Barnett appeared today as a special appearance only for Dr. William Ayres...after a private meeting with the Judge...sidebar....
Attorney Barnett reported to the court that he would not be able to represent Dr. Ayres in any future proceedings because he had repesented a victim of Dr. Ayres in a prior case...conflict of interest. WOW
He and Dr. Ayres agreed that he could represent the Dr. in the Bail Hearing today. He did...Bail increased to $750,000.00 by Judge Carl Holm.
Attorney Philip Barnett has made two Special Apperances for a defendant he knows he can NOT REPRESENT.....Conflict of Interest... He told the court today that he repesented a client against Dr. William Ayres.....therefore he could not represent the Dr.??????What was he doing there then?
Did Attorney Philip Barnett have some personal knowledge years ago that could have saved some children from becomming a victim of Dr. Ayres. If So did he do anything about it...to save a child.
Note. Attorney Philip Barnett is the same attorney who represented the Federal Employee ICE agent in the Mr. Smith in the Equal Justice post.
Felony Hit and Run...(missing for six days) by Belmont Police to Case dismissed no charges.
neverforget
04-13-2007, 05:51 PM
Attorney Philip Barnett has made two Special Apperances for a defendant he knows he can NOT REPRESENT.....Conflict of Interest... He told the court today that he repesented a client against Dr. William Ayres.....therefore he could not represent the Dr.??????What was he doing there then?
Did Attorney Philip Barnett have some personal knowledge years ago that could have saved some children from becomming a victim of Dr. Ayres. If So did he do anything about it...to save a child.
Note. Attorney Philip Barnett is the same attorney who represented the Federal Employee ICE agent in the Mr. Smith in the Equal Justice post.
Felony Hit and Run...(missing for six days) by Belmont Police to Case dismissed no charges. WoW!!!! what is going on here?
neverforget
04-13-2007, 05:55 PM
Its sounds like some kind of Pornography ring. Has anybody read about the Texas Youth Authority? It's sounds like this is as big.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA041107.01B.krod.3a6c8d4.html
Michael Stogner
04-13-2007, 07:13 PM
Dr. William Ayres is free on bail of $750,000.00 as of this afternoon.
Judge Carl Holm raised bail to $750,000.00 which was half of what he orginally placed for the arrest warrant, $1,500,000.....Judge Thomas Smith SLASHED the bail to $250,000.00 with no explanation. Today after 2 more victims were added to the case and 4 more counts the bail was raised.....and PAID....I don't see how anyone can think Dr. William Ayres is not a threat to himself at this time.....He is losing everything.....he has 30 young men who are going to testify against him as of now and counting....I think the low amount of bail has put him at risk from himself....
NO BAIL STATUS......San Mateo County is easy on Child Molestors......
Tommy
04-13-2007, 09:31 PM
And as usual, you don't hear a peep out of our D.A.
Michael Stogner
04-14-2007, 08:39 AM
And as usual, you don't hear a peep out of our D.A.
Tommy,
Well said.....not one comment....not a Glad we caught this danderous man.
Sorry it took us so long....Not I was Outraged that this kind of crime was committed against so many children... Not I'm Outraged that Judge Smith would slash the approiate bail of $1,500,000 to $250,000.
James P. Fox our leader in Law Enforcement for San Mateo County....
NOT ONE COMMENT........That says alot
Michael Stogner
04-14-2007, 09:01 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=73618
Todays article...
Dr. William was released from jail yesterday afternoon.
shadow
04-14-2007, 10:36 AM
I met this man several times back in 1968. We were constantly reminded of what a great guy he was and how he was from "Hillsborough" and had his own PBS show. He was my friend's "personal psychiatrist" and he seemed like a nice enough guy.
I find the whole thing quite disturbing especially since we were the ones who supposidly needed help. (We were 14 at that time)
I can only hope that my friend knew him before this trouble began.
Why on Earth would someone in his position, who knew how damaging this type of activity could be, do this to these kids?
Perhaps kids should be given a list of their rights before entering into a one on one meeting with any adult.
And how is it that this guy is not in Jail Beginning Now for the Rest of his Life?
Michael Stogner
04-14-2007, 11:11 AM
I met this man several times back in 1968. We were constantly reminded of what a great guy he was and how he was from "Hillsborough" and had his own PBS show. He was my friend's "personal psychiatrist" and he seemed like a nice enough guy.
I find the whole thing quite disturbing especially since we were the ones who supposidly needed help. (We were 14 at that time)
I can only hope that my friend knew him before this trouble began.
Why on Earth would someone in his position, who knew how damaging this type of activity could be, do this to these kids?
Perhaps kids should be given a list of their rights before entering into a one on one meeting with any adult. And how is it that this guy is not in Jail Beginning Now for the Rest of his Life?
Shadow,
Unfortunatley the answer is quite simple, We in San Mateo County have Judges who allow this to happen.
DDA Melissa McKowen has done everything possible to have this man behind bars and two of our Judges have allowed him out. They both knew he had over $1,000,000.00 Cash assets at time of arrest. Bail could have been set at $10,000,000.00 and he would have been able to post it.
This is an example of JUSTICE in San Mateo County. The power of the Judges.
DDA Melissa McKowan needs all the help she can get..Change of Venue. NOW
To Judge Carl Holm:
McKowan said the childpsychiatrist, if released, could either present a danger to children or flee the area altogether.
"Would you suggest that (Ayres) is a threat to society at this stage of his life and career?" Holm asked McKowan.
"Your honor, I would," she replied. "This is a person with a 30-year history of apparent pedophilic behavior."
TT94062
04-14-2007, 04:44 PM
Hi
I saw Dr. Ayres on the news and watched with horror as I realized I had paid this man thousands of dollars to help my son.. and luckily I sat in the waiting room when he had asked me to leave. I did not.. My son is a big kid and was very angry.. I called my son and he said that Dr. Ayres never touched him.. but reading all this has me so concerned.. This makes me sick.. I cant believe the man I paid to help was already accused of this.. My son saw him in 95.. and I didnt know and was referred by a fmcc. My son says he never touched him.. and he is doing well today but now I have so many questions.
I am so sorry for the victims. This was such a hard time in our lives.
I would love to talk to a victim.. Thanks TT
Michael Stogner
04-14-2007, 05:08 PM
Hi
I saw Dr. Ayres on the news and watched with horror as I realized I had paid this man thousands of dollars to help my son.. and luckily I sat in the waiting room when he had asked me to leave. I did not.. My son is a big kid and was very angry.. I called my son and he said that Dr. Ayres never touched him.. but reading all this has me so concerned.. This makes me sick.. I cant believe the man I paid to help was already accused of this.. My son saw him in 95.. and I didnt know and was referred by a fmcc. My son says he never touched him.. and he is doing well today but now I have so many questions.
I am so sorry for the victims. This was such a hard time in our lives.
I would love to talk to a victim.. Thanks TT
TT. You did the right thing by waiting in the waiting room.....
I have never left my children with anyone alone....Period.
You might have saved your son by just being so close..
Best of Luck
Michael
TT94062
04-14-2007, 06:03 PM
Thanks.. I feel better already..
This is so shocking and I had no idea how many men had come forward..
Makes running with scissors movie very real and I am not making light since this has affected so many. It is just that you cant rely on credentials or referrals and I think there should be an easier way to check..well back then there was not a google search.. Wow.. I am in shock.. Thanks TT
Michael Stogner
04-15-2007, 08:04 AM
Thanks.. I feel better already..
This is so shocking and I had no idea how many men had come forward..
Makes running with scissors movie very real and I am not making light since this has affected so many. It is just that you cant rely on credentials or referrals and I think there should be an easier way to check..well back then there was not a google search.. Wow.. I am in shock.. Thanks TT
TT...
Call Prosecutor Melissa McKowan at 650-363-4774
Tell her that Dr.William Ayres asked you to leave the waiting room, while he was with your son.
Michael Stogner
04-15-2007, 08:44 AM
From article by Amy Yarbrough 4/26/06
I think I have found one of the people responsible. His name is Gerry Hillard.
Gerry Hilliard, managing attorney for the Private Defender Program at juvenile court. said
"It comes as a shock. I don't believe it," he said of the allegations.
"I would use him today had he not retired."
The problem here is Gerry is making this statement to a reporter 9 months after Dr. William Ayres has settled a civil suit of molestation, and he has already sold his house in Burlingame to pay for it.
If Gerry Hillard is still employed by the Private Defender Program today I recommend he be removed at once.
OnbekendeBron
04-15-2007, 12:51 PM
From article by Amy Yarbrough 4/26/06
I think I have found one of the people responsible...
I too have a recommendation about people to take a harder look at:
Dr. Etta Bryant defended "Mr." Ayres during his civil trial in the following letter to the Oakland Tribune.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20060503/ai_n16345579
She defends both his character and his "examination" practices. Further, she referred parents to him over the years (To send their kids to him.) Perhaps this may jog the memory of people who used her referral, but don't specifically remember who they sent their kids to. Also, I'd question her integrity in general, having apparently supported this technique that many others in the field found to be so controversial.
I find her harsh words to potential victims to also be particularly offensive, in light of the fact that the investigations were in process and expanding at the time.
Michael Stogner
04-15-2007, 02:39 PM
I too have a recommendation about people to take a harder look at:
Dr. Etta Bryant defended "Mr." Ayres during his civil trial in the following letter to the Oakland Tribune.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20060503/ai_n16345579
She defends both his character and his "examination" practices. Further, she referred parents to him over the years (To send their kids to him.) Perhaps this may jog the memory of people who used her referral, but don't specifically remember who they sent their kids to. Also, I'd question her integrity in general, having apparently supported this technique that many others in the field found to be so controversial.
I find her harsh words to potential victims to also be particularly offensive, in light of the fact that the investigations were in process and expanding at the time.
What were her thoughts on buying and giving a chess set to a young boy, pulling his pants down during a game.....
Standard Practice in San Mateo County?
Michael Stogner
04-15-2007, 06:52 PM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?type=opinions&id=73438
No mention of Victoria...was that a typo?
Editor Jon Mays and Publisher Jerry Lee are completely aware of her DILIGENCE in this investigation.
Without Victoria there is no Dr. William Ayres case PERIOD!
On behalf of the ordinary citizens of San Mateo County,
Thank You, Victoria
Jon Mays made some mention of Victoria Balfour today...
Thank You Jon
Michael Stogner
04-15-2007, 08:45 PM
What is the name of the San Mateo Police Officer who investigated
Greg Hogue's allegations of molestation by Dr. William Ayres in 1987.
This officer determined this child's report to be UNFOUNDED. How? Why?
Had he determined it to be founded and filed charges 20 years ago how many victims and family members would have been saved.
What is his/her name?
Les Bright
04-15-2007, 10:38 PM
From article by Amy Yarbrough 4/26/06
I think I have found one of the people responsible. His name is Gerry Hillard.
Gerry Hilliard, managing attorney for the Private Defender Program at juvenile court. said
"It comes as a shock. I don't believe it," he said of the allegations.
"I would use him today had he not retired."
The problem here is Gerry is making this statement to a reporter 9 months after Dr. William Ayres has settled a civil suit of molestation, and he has already sold his house in Burlingame to pay for it.
If Gerry Hillard is still employed by the Private Defender Program today I recommend he be removed at once.
Here, here, Michael! If ANYONE so much as suggests that a man might be innocent, that person should be FIRED on the spot! ESPECIALLY if that person is a professional criminal defense attorney! EVEN IF THAT PERSON MIGHT POTENTIALLY REPRESENT DR. WILLIAM AYRES whom everyone knows is guilty, because no one would seriously doubt that at this point, given the nature of the allegations, in which 30 boys were ABSOLUTELY molested years ago but only one mentioned it until recently. These are cases where a trial by a jury of his peers would only get things WRONG. GUILTY first, trial later, or never! Anyone who says otherwise is PART OF THE CONSPIRACY and worse than a molester! (Especially any future jurors.) In fact, anyone wanting to get on this jury should be made to PROMISE that they think he's a pedophile already! So should the judge! WHY HAVEN'T MORE JUDGES DENOUNCED DR. AYRES in the press as GUILTY?!?! Is there a coverup?!?!?
All people on the Private Defender Program who suggest a defendant is Innocent should be FIRED. NO QUESTIONS ASKED. They are responsible for molestation. Same with judges! Welcome to San Mateo County!
(Except if there's a missing Sobe bottle involved. In that case, the person is CLEARLY an innocent victim of the criminal justice system and should be released from custody immediately with ZERO bail.)
Keep bringing rationality, fairness and a sense of proportion to the criminal justice system, Michael! Welcome to San Mateo County!
Les Bright
04-15-2007, 10:51 PM
And as usual, you don't hear a peep out of our D.A.
Here, here, Michael! As usual, like some kind of chicken he sends his DEPUTIES to speak for him, like opposing the bail reduction in court! Absurd! And I, for one, would be a lot more comfortable if he came out and made more statements about pending trials to the PRESS, so that more and more and MORE of these cases will be sent to other counties on CHANGE OF VENUE because the jury pool here has been TAINTed! I want our criminals tried FIRST in the Press, THEN by Michael Stogner in this online forum, and then finally in San Francisco, where they REALLY know how to administer justice!
From now on, I'm going to INSIST that our DA hold a press conference to announce that the persons he's prosecuting are REALLY REALLY GUILTY of the crimes he's charged. Charging them isn't enough! Trials aren't enough! He should also hold a press conference!
I've had enough of silence followed by conviction! I want a press conference followed by dismissal or acquittal! Elect Mike Nifong DA of San Mateo County!
Michael Stogner
04-16-2007, 09:40 AM
Here, here, Michael! If ANYONE so much as suggests that a man might be innocent, that person should be FIRED on the spot! ESPECIALLY if that person is a professional criminal defense attorney! EVEN IF THAT PERSON MIGHT POTENTIALLY REPRESENT DR. WILLIAM AYRES whom everyone knows is guilty, because no one would seriously doubt that at this point, given the nature of the allegations, in which 30 boys were ABSOLUTELY molested years ago but only one mentioned it until recently. These are cases where a trial by a jury of his peers would only get things WRONG. GUILTY first, trial later, or never! Anyone who says otherwise is PART OF THE CONSPIRACY and worse than a molester! (Especially any future jurors.) In fact, anyone wanting to get on this jury should be made to PROMISE that they think he's a pedophile already! So should the judge! WHY HAVEN'T MORE JUDGES DENOUNCED DR. AYRES in the press as GUILTY?!?! Is there a coverup?!?!?
All people on the Private Defender Program who suggest a defendant is Innocent should be FIRED. NO QUESTIONS ASKED. They are responsible for molestation. Same with judges! Welcome to San Mateo County!
(Except if there's a missing Sobe bottle involved. In that case, the person is CLEARLY an innocent victim of the criminal justice system and should be released from custody immediately with ZERO bail.)
Keep bringing rationality, fairness and a sense of proportion to the criminal justice system, Michael! Welcome to San Mateo County!
Les,
If Gerry W. wants to go to Dr. William Ayres himself thats fine with me.
If he makes a statement that he believes he is innocent until proven guilty
thats fine with me, especially if he might represent the Dr.
But don't send or refer any more children to Dr. William Ayres as the Private Defender Program.
You stated that only one child/victim has come forward recently....That is just not true. In 1987 20 years ago a brave young boy came forward and told his parent, who in turn told a therapist, who reported it to CPS and the San Mateo Police Department. So in 1987 at least 5 adults knew of Dr. William Ayres. That brave boy was Greg Hogue.
You mentioned a (missing Sobe Soda bottle) for those readers who don't know about it. Les is making fun of the fact that some San Mateo County Employees, Sheriff Detectives Gary Ramos, and Joe Farmer filed a false police report on 10/09/02 8:30 PM in a Triple Murder Case. They fabricated
a story about a Sobe Soda Softdrink Bottle existence......
They also committed Perjury by testifing to it existence.
The Sobe Bottle is not missing.......There never was one.
I have never said I thought Eddie Rapoza was innocent or guilty.
I said several San Mateo County Employees have committed Felonies in his case.
Michael Stogner
04-16-2007, 10:28 AM
Here, here, Michael! As usual, like some kind of chicken he sends his DEPUTIES to speak for him, like opposing the bail reduction in court! Absurd! And I, for one, would be a lot more comfortable if he came out and made more statements about pending trials to the PRESS, so that more and more and MORE of these cases will be sent to other counties on CHANGE OF VENUE because the jury pool here has been TAINTed! I want our criminals tried FIRST in the Press, THEN by Michael Stogner in this online forum, and then finally in San Francisco, where they REALLY know how to administer justice!
From now on, I'm going to INSIST that our DA hold a press conference to announce that the persons he's prosecuting are REALLY REALLY GUILTY of the crimes he's charged. Charging them isn't enough! Trials aren't enough! He should also hold a press conference!
I've had enough of silence followed by conviction! I want a press conference followed by dismissal or acquittal! Elect Mike Nifong DA of San Mateo County!
Les,
I was thinking of something along the lines of....This is a very serious case, and as you all know, I know the defendant personally and I can't make any comment.
Thats all I was looking for.
Michael Stogner
04-16-2007, 12:10 PM
According to a recent article by Kim Curtis Associated Press Writer.
Deputy District Attorney Melissa McKowan is expected to add charges next week alleging that Dr. William Ayres molested four more boys who had been in his care, bringing the total to nine cases that can be prosecuted within the statute of limitations.
That makes nine total alleged victims and counting.
TT94062
04-16-2007, 08:09 PM
Hi
I read something that said..jog your memory and that is what is happening..
I remember more..
Dont hate me but the first day.. I supported the man and called his attorney..in support..but then I read all the people that came forward and grilled my son.. in a good way.. he says the man never touched him..
I then realized..he refused the examination and Dr Ayres told me
that it was very difficult.. my son had a bad attitude etc.. but he just had a physical..so I told him to call that Dr.. I am lucky that my ex husbands dad was a dr and there were many drs trying to help my son.. long story but will call because I do believe other boys were hurt now.. I am so sorry.. I feel lucky for my son was spared..but he made comments that are coming back.. very sad.. TT
Michael Stogner
04-17-2007, 08:22 AM
April 2006
Dr. William Ayres, told the Mercury News reporters Sean Webby and Renee Koury
"I have never done anything that differs from the practices of what other physicians and psychiatrists do,"
Let's find out if this is true.
Every psychiatrist in San Mateo County who is receiving income from San Mateo County should be asked if they are giving physicals to young boys or girls.
If so lets put a stop to this NOW.
Dr. William Ayres was a mentor,teacher and leader to many psychiatrist.
He now is an alleged Child Molestor. and has been since the 1960's
Michael Stogner
04-19-2007, 09:54 AM
Its sounds like some kind of Pornography ring. Has anybody read about the Texas Youth Authority? It's sounds like this is as big.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA041107.01B.krod.3a6c8d4.html
You might be right on the mark.
NAMBLA needs to be considered.
The San Mateo Police Department knew about several allegations prior to the Complaint filed by Licensed Clinical Social Worker Jeff Lugerner in 1987 for Greg Hogue. San Mateo Police Department determined that complaint was UNFOUNDED.
What is the name of that Policer Officer or Officers who determined Greg Hogue's complaint to be unfounded?
Michael Stogner
04-19-2007, 04:12 PM
Before the Investigation became unfounded, was it communicated to the District Attorney's Office. Did anyone from the DA'S Office know about this investigation, did anyone from the DA'S Office tell the San Mateo Police Department to stop this investigation.
James P. Fox and Steve Wagstaffe should be able to tell us if the DA'S Office was involved in this investigation.
Sometimes the investigations are completed and never forwarded to the DA'S Office. Is this one of those cases.
Jeff Lugerner a Social Worker who in 1987 filed the complaint? once he became aware of Greg Hogue's allegations.
Michael Stogner
04-20-2007, 08:21 AM
http://www.kron.com/Global/story.asp?S=6358424
Michael Stogner
04-20-2007, 08:44 AM
Before the Investigation became unfounded, was it communicated to the District Attorney's Office. Did anyone from the DA'S Office know about this investigation, did anyone from the DA'S Office tell the San Mateo Police Department to stop this investigation.
James P. Fox and Steve Wagstaffe should be able to tell us if the DA'S Office was involved in this investigation.
Sometimes the investigations are completed and never forwarded to the DA'S Office. Is this one of those cases.
Jeff Lugerner a Social Worker who in 1987 filed the complaint? once he became aware of Greg Hogue's allegations.
An example of Police work in Redwood City which I have reported in the past.
Date 5/22/02
Reporting Officer P. Chang ID#351
Crime Title/Classification
UNFOUNDED CHILD ABUSE/ CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
The RWCPD started the investigation as UNFOUNDED.
Also the Attorney who they were supposed to be investigating, was listed as a witness not the involved party.
And officer Chang chose to interview the attorney over the phone not in person.
I guess it doesn't matter since the investigation was started as UNFOUNDED and the results had to match...UNFOUNDED
This police officer didn't find it unusual that the male attorney told him he had seen (Female Child) at her residence several times. In the living room and the bedroom.
This girl was 11 or 12 years old.
Nice work
The was done under the leadership of Cheif Carlos Bolanos our new
Under-Sheriff
Michael Stogner
04-21-2007, 08:19 AM
San Mateo County Counsel.
County Counsel Tom Casey said "departments often don't know what the police and District Attorney's Office do."
What about when they do know?
Casey said the county had nothing to do with the contract with Ayres.
Really? nothing to do with it?
"It was the juvenile justice system that hired him to perform psychiatric evaluations or serve as an expert witness."
Who is the Juvenile Justice System?
"It's not our court system,
it's the state of California's court system,"
Is he blaming the State of California?
"The county and the Board of Supervisors have no involvement in terms of how the court system runs."
Aren't many of our Judges former employees of the District Attorney Office? County Employees?
Hon. Judge Marta Diaz former DDA...
Welcome to San Mateo County
Michael Stogner
04-21-2007, 11:35 AM
San Mateo County Counsel.
County Counsel Tom Casey said "departments often don't know what the police and District Attorney's Office do."
What about when they do know?
Casey said the county had nothing to do with the contract with Ayres.
Really? nothing to do with it?
"It was the juvenile justice system that hired him to perform psychiatric evaluations or serve as an expert witness."
Who is the Juvenile Justice System?
"It's not our court system,
it's the state of California's court system,"
Is he blaming the State of California?
"The county and the Board of Supervisors have no involvement in terms of how the court system runs."
Aren't many of our Judges former employees of the District Attorney Office? County Employees?
Hon. Judge Marta Diaz former DDA...
Welcome to San Mateo County
"It was the juvenile justice system that hired him to perform psychiatric evaluations or serve as an expert witness."
Thomas Casey III wants us to believe that some SYSTEM hired Dr. William Ayres.
That is simply not true.
Some San Mateo County Employee hired him.
Who hired him and signed the agreement for his services?
Michael Stogner
04-22-2007, 09:06 AM
http://cbs5.com/video/?id=22270@kpix.dayport.com&cid=129
Michael Stogner
04-22-2007, 09:24 AM
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&id=5171437
Sappho
04-23-2007, 01:53 AM
This whole case reminds me of Dr. Felix Polk. He too was a child psychiatrist who worked for the county, although not San Mateo County. He "had an affair with" an underage patient, whom he later married. Yes, if the victim is female, and the abuse is ongoing, the newspapers call it an affair. Some of his patients complained about this, but nothing happened. Fast-forward several decades, and Dr. Polk's child bride/patient snapped out and killed him. Dr. Polk has been heaped with praise by the county and by his colleagues, yet he was a leader in the Satanic Panic hysteria of the 1980s and suffered from schizophrenia. His wife never did receive adequate psychiatric care, and now has a fear of psychiatry--who can blame her?
The problem isn't just San Mateo County. The problem is systemic to the United States. A child's word that he or she was sexually abused is not considered evidence of abuse. Unless there is physical evidence or an adult witness, nothing will happen. If the parent of the alleged victim tells all her friends to avoid that doctor, because he molested her son, he could sue he for slander! After all, the allegation was unfounded. There was no evidence of abuse, just a child who said the doctor touched him. Everybody knows children are liars.
Dr. Ayres' victims went to prison? Not surprising. They saw that there was no justice at an early age. They were victimized by someone who should have helped them. They probably feel worthless. He ruined their lives instead of giving them therapy. Wouldn't it be ironic if the good doctor was put in the same prison as his victims? I wonder if he will even get any prison time, considering that there was no intercourse, and he is elderly. It almost doesn't matter, because no punishment can equal what he did to all those children.
If you were molested, it wasn't your fault and you aren't alone. Recovery is possible. RAINN (http://RAINN.org) has a toll-free, anonymous hotline and resources for you. For people abused by professionals, including psychiatrists, advocateweb.org (http://advocateweb.org) is an invaluable resource. Both sites have articles on protecting yourself and your children, and on supporting survivors of sexual abuse.
Michael Stogner
04-23-2007, 03:24 PM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/23/MNGEQPDM0N1.DTL
Criminal charges against Ayres might never have been brought if not for a chance contact that the 2002 accuser made with a New York freelance writer and victims rights advocate, Victoria Balfour.
"I know the amount of work that you put (into) this has been unbelievable," Callagy wrote to Balfour a few days later. "I am personally going to write the search warrant."
Michael Stogner
04-23-2007, 08:33 PM
From todays SF Chronicle Article
San Mateo police determined the report was unfounded, and the case was never formally referred to prosecutors.
Who were the police officers that determined Greg Hogue's allegations as UNFOUNDED? What are there names?
the case was never formally referred to prosecutors.
FORMALLY? Are they saying that the District Attorney's office never heard of these allegations before they were determined to be UNFOUNDED.
The original police file, including a copy of a $1,000 check that Ayres allegedly sent to the boy's mother in 1985 because of an "accounting error" after the youth refused to go to more sessions, is missing, according to a 2005 police report.
Did the original police file become missing before or after it was determined to be UNFOUNDED.
Who was the last San Mateo Police Officer to have the Dr. William Ayres file?
Was Marta Diaz working for the District Attorney's office during this time period, 1987-1989?
Michael Stogner
04-25-2007, 11:01 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?type=opinions&id=74110
Lauren wrote: I hope Judge Thomas McGinn ensures that this criminal child psychiatrist is put behind bars where he should have been 20 years ago.
Hon. Judge Thomas McGinn is the Jugge who without any explaination SLASHED the $1,500,000.00 bail (that was set by Hon. Judge Carl Holm) to $250,000.00
What are his thoughts on child molesters?
Hon. Judge Thomas McGinn is the LAST Judge in San Mateo County who should hear this case,
He is also the same Judge who Abused his authority, in the Edith Delgado bail hearing raising the $300,000 bail to $3,000,000 without explaination.
Michael Stogner
04-25-2007, 03:50 PM
Victoria Balfour is a HERO......Radio tonight.
Victoria Balfour is the single person who is responsible for the San Mateo Police Department to proceed with the Dr. William Ayres Investigation.
On behalf of all the residents of San Mateo County
I say
Thank You..... Victoria Balfour
Quote:
Originally Posted by nitamac
The Gene Burns show KGO Newstalk AM 810, from eight pm to nine pm. victoria Balfour interview on the Dr. Ayres case. Listeners can call in with questions.
Michael Stogner
04-26-2007, 08:14 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=74153
Michael Stogner
04-27-2007, 11:34 AM
Today 3 additional counts were added to Dr. William Ayres case. His new attorney stated that he was concerned that the DA was making to many statements to the press.
Judge Calrl Holm. "I don't blame you."
and warned Melissa McKowan about her ethics.
A Change of Venue might not be such a bad idea.
Next date 5/11/07 9:00 AM
Michael Stogner
04-27-2007, 03:51 PM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?type=bnews&id=74239&eddate=
Hon Judge Carl Holm's suggestion that Melissa McKowan be reminded of her ethical obligation is laughable.
The Hon. Judge Carl Holm gave hand-signals twice to prosecutor Al Giannini during a Triple Murder case recently. I witnessed that and I would testify under oath to this statement.
Talk about ETHICS.
Melissa McKowan is doing a Great Job on this case in my opinion.
Michael Stogner
04-28-2007, 08:09 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=74240
No wonder it took so long for Dr. William Aryes to find an attorney to represent him.
Approx 40 alleged victims to testify.....mistaken...we shall see
The Original San Mateo Police Department report of 1987 is still missing. This is the one that Greg Hogue filed, also the two police officers names who handled that case and determined it to be unfounded.
Was Marta Diaz a prosecutor in 1987-89 and did she have knowledge of these allegations?
nitamac
04-29-2007, 01:07 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=74240
No wonder it took so long for Dr. William Aryes to find an attorney to represent him.
Approx 40 alleged victims to testify.....mistaken...we shall see
The Original San Mateo Police Department report of 1987 is still missing. This is the one that Greg Hogue filed, also the two police officers names who handled that case and determined it to be unfounded.
Was Marta Diaz a prosecutor in 1987-89 and did she have knowledge of these allegations? i read todays paper and could not believe what i was reading! Ayres lawyer's comments about the victims false memories! is that the best he can come up with? is he calling all these victims liers?
Dr. Ayres lawyer, Doron Weinberg, has told the press that Ayres' victims (nearly 40 now, who have come forward) are reacting to "suggestions" and have somehow produced "false memories" in which Ayres' legitimate physical examinations were mistaken for sexual abuse.
First of all, Ayres seems to be alone among child psychiatrists in conducting "exams" of the genitals of boy patients (have any girls reported being subjected to "exams"?)
From what I have read, exams by a psychiatrist on children should be limited to neurological exams, which do not involve removing a boy's pants.
Although Ayres might have considered these "exams" to be "legitimate", its pretty clear that his colleagues to NOT consider undressing boys (NOTE: ONLY BOYS) during counseling sessions to be legitimate. That creates a lot of doubt in my mind about just what was going on during Ayres's "examinations". I'd say that its Ayres who has a credibility problem, not the kids whose penises he was evidently so interestes in "examining"
I think Weinberg will have a very hard time demonstrating that Ayres was merely doing "routine" exams, when none of his colleagues say that undressing patients in therapy sessions is at all "routine" - in fact, what Ayres was doing was extremely aberrant and suspicious.
An LA Times article on Ayres included this passage:
Molest cases called 'exams' by accused
A Bay Area psychiatrist accused of lewd acts with boys has said in past civil cases that he was conducting necessary physical examinations.
By Scott Gold, Times Staff Writer
April 7, 2007
A quarter of a century ago, one of the nation's most respected child psychiatrists stood in front of his colleagues and dropped a bombshell.
With characteristic confidence, Dr. William Ayres suggested at a Bay Area conference that psychiatrists should assess the sexual development of their adolescent patients by conducting intimate physical exams. It was important, Ayres contended, to determine whether a patient had reached what were known in the profession as Tanner stages — milestones of sexual development, such as the development of pubic hair.
Most of Ayres' peers weren't comfortable doing much more than weighing a patient in order to gauge the proper dose of a medication. Anything more, certainly anything that involved undressing, would be handed over to another physician.
"My training was very strict on that," said Hugh Wilson Ridlehuber, a retired child psychiatrist who said he was present for Ayres' presentation and once worked out of the same group practice as Ayres. "Even if it's done innocently, there is a very high risk of a patient sexualizing it and affecting your relationship with the patient."
Ayres was arrested Thursday at his San Mateo home and charged with molesting male patients.
Sappho
05-02-2007, 01:55 AM
So Weinberg says someone "put the idea in their heads" that they were molested. Sometimes molestation victims don't know it was molestation, because they don't have a word for the obscene acts done to them. They just know that they feel dirty and ashamed.
NAMBLA, the North American Man Boy Love Association, says that the feelings of shame and guilt molestation victims feel are "put in their heads" by society, which wrongly frowns on child molestation (in their eyes). It's only because society says touching boys is wrong, that the boys feel violated, according to NAMBLA. The kids would be fine with it if overprotective adults didn't make them feel bad. So Weinberg is using a variation of the NAMBLA defense.
If a child feels like he was molested by a doctor who refused to allow a witness to a nude exam, then he probably was. I always sat in the waiting room when my youngest say his psychologist. My husband or I are always present for physical exams. I can't imagine going to a doctor who asked me to leave. That would be a warning sign to take my son and get out.
Michael Stogner
05-02-2007, 10:42 AM
So Weinberg says someone "put the idea in their heads" that they were molested. Sometimes molestation victims don't know it was molestation, because they don't have a word for the obscene acts done to them. They just know that they feel dirty and ashamed.
NAMBLA, the North American Man Boy Love Association, says that the feelings of shame and guilt molestation victims feel are "put in their heads" by society, which wrongly frowns on child molestation (in their eyes). It's only because society says touching boys is wrong, that the boys feel violated, according to NAMBLA. The kids would be fine with it if overprotective adults didn't make them feel bad. So Weinberg is using a variation of the NAMBLA defense.
If a child feels like he was molested by a doctor who refused to allow a witness to a nude exam, then he probably was. I always sat in the waiting room when my youngest say his psychologist. My husband or I are always present for physical exams. I can't imagine going to a doctor who asked me to leave. That would be a warning sign to take my son and get out.
Honorable Judge Thomas McGinn Smith reduced Dr. William Ayres BAIL from $1,500,000.00 to $250.000.......What was he thinking about.
Ayres is being accused of not just doing "exams", but of fondling and masturbating boys. The people making these accusations are grown men now, and they probably realize how serious these charges are. I think it is likely that the boys Ayres (allegedly) assaulted in this way could tell the difference between being "examined" by Ayres and Ayres playing with thier genitals. Since male genitals are external I'd say that the boys making the accusations had a better idea of what was going on during thier examinations than the women who accused the pelvic exam-giving doctor cited by Doron Weinberg as being a "similar" case to that of Ayres (never mind that that guy, who was acquitted, was a G.P. at Kaiser Hospital whose office was at least set up to do legit phyisical exams - Ayres had no reason at all, except in his own mind, to do "physicals" and he apparently improvised his "exam table" in his counseling office)
Hopefully at trial the extent of his abuse of these children will be revealed, whether just checking them out to get his jollies or actually fondling and masturbating them. I believe that Ayres, who is a smart pedophile (he's on the same moral level as those hapless creeps caught by Chris Hansen on "NBC Dateline: To Catch A Predator", but much cleverer) knows how to pick his victims and how far he can go with them while still maintianing the pretense of this contact being "medical"
I'm sure that Ayres defense will try to portray these unwarranted sexual contacts with boys as being part of his medical routine - after all, its apparently very important for Ayres to know (first hand!) the "Tanner Stages" of the boys sent to him for counseling.
This is going to be tough sell for Weinberg and Ayres!
Roscoe_Beedle
05-02-2007, 04:55 PM
Slow down Michael. The guy is arrested, charged and will soon stand trial. You seem to be handling the case "on-line" again.
Now there are 40 accusers? How is it possible that 40 men could keep quiet for so long? Even as a child, 40 children not saying a word about this alledged molestations? For years and years? Until now....
I have a real problem with something like this coming up many years later. I sense that the County will be sued by everyone of these "victims" for a rich payday. If an adult male keeps quiet about something as disgusting as this for many years my question is what standing do they have now?
And consider this: What IF this guy did not do it. How does he prove it?
I would be most interested in the proof of these things.
Taylor
05-02-2007, 05:29 PM
Uh, Taylor, you haven't been doing your homework. Please check out the internet for many definitive studies on why victims of abuse (particularly males) don't ever come forward to report abuse - EVER.
According to a study at the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, 80 % of sex abuse victims will never come forward to report the abuse.
The reason ? Shame. Embarrassment. Fear of ridicule by peers. Guilt that they didn't do anything to stop it.
It's very clear that you have never been a victim of abuse. Otherwise you would not have such a judgemental attitude. I suggest that you call some sex abuse associations or talk to people have been abused. I am sure you will change your tune. The best thing is to put yourself in someone else's shoes before you judge.
Taylor
05-02-2007, 05:30 PM
In my previous message I meant to say Roscoe instead of Taylor. I am a new member. At any rate, Roscoe PLEASE read up on the many studies on sex abuse victims and why they never come forward. Thanks
People did not "keep quiet" about it for so long. There were complaints about Ayres dating back many years. If you have read the coverage of the story, two abuse accusations came from delinquents sent to Ayres for evaluation, and one was declared "unfounded" due to police bungling and loss of evidence (the $1000 "hush money" check Ayres allegedly sent an accuser's mother in 1987)
People are fearful to come forward because it is embarrassing and painful to talk.
Ultimately it will come down to he said-he said situation and the jury will have to decide who is more credible. The accusers will tell thier stories and Ayres will tell his. I just think that it is Ayres who has a credibility problem - but, yes, the case will be decided at trial, where the veracity of the acccusers' stories, and Ayres' explanations can be weighed.
I would just say that, from what I have read, Ayres does not appear to be innocent. At the very least he seems to have an inappropriate intererest in examining boys' - and ONLY boys' genitals, and I have yet to hear about any such exams performed on girls. Ayres should not get a pass just because he's a doctor, and whether there is a "standard of care" for child shrinks that includes intimate physical exams in NOT for Ayres himself to decide. That will be for Ayres reputable peers to determine. Ayres can not, on his own, decide that seeing if a boy has pubic hair or not is important to his psychiatric treatment of them.
Taylor
05-02-2007, 05:50 PM
Zush -
You are absolutely correct - to date not one single girl has come forward to say that she got a "physical" from Ayres.
FYI- there is not a single child psychiatrist in the United States who makes boys take their pants off.
The majority of boys who were sent to Ayres were sent by their pediatricians. These pediatricians gave thorough physicals to the boys. When they found there was nothing wrong with them physically, they sent them off to Ayres,- who was supposed to be treating them for emotional problems in the mind. That's what a child psychiatrist does. Why in God's name would Ayres need to give the boys a "physical" again ? I asked my own psychiatrist, who was trained at Harvard, whether he had ever heard of a child psychiatrist giving a kids physicals and he said "Never. That's crazy."
I don't care what Ayres' lawyer says - Ayres is cooked.
Roscoe_Beedle
05-03-2007, 10:14 PM
I do accept that victims can feel shame or embarrassment that may stifle them in speaking out. However, it seems there are a large number of people claiming molestation suddenly stepping forward. Having raised children myself, I hardly can believe that if all three of my children had a similar experience with this Dr Ayres that all three would react the same.
It could be true that all remained silent. Or, there could be some "piling-on" here to get in on some massive lawsuit for damages against the County. My original question stands, How do you defend yourself against charges like this over something that happened many years ago and there were no witnesses?
I would be most interested in seeing where the testimony leads....
Michael Stogner
05-03-2007, 11:28 PM
Roscoe, is this a response to something I posted? My last post was about Judge Smith I think.
Slow down Michael. The guy is arrested, charged and will soon stand trial. You seem to be handling the case "on-line" again.
Now there are 40 accusers? How is it possible that 40 men could keep quiet for so long? Even as a child, 40 children not saying a word about this alledged molestations? For years and years? Until now....
I have a real problem with something like this coming up many years later. I sense that the County will be sued by everyone of these "victims" for a rich payday. If an adult male keeps quiet about something as disgusting as this for many years my question is what standing do they have now?
And consider this: What IF this guy did not do it. How does he prove it?
I would be most interested in the proof of these things.
Taylor
05-04-2007, 12:43 AM
Roscoe-
Do your homework ! Read up on the priests cases. Talk to experts. 40 victims is actually a very small amount, considering that Ayres saw more than 2000 patients. More than 80 % of male abuse victims will NEVER come forward. That's because all abuse victims think THEY ARE THE ONLY ONE and that it was something they did to encourage the abuser. I have seen this reported over and over in abuse cases. How would you like to come forward, thinking you were the only one ? You would be scared to death.That's why most never do.
Historically, in cases where there have been multiple abuse cases, it always takes one brave victim coming forward to encourage others to come forward. There are not many out there who will risk being the first to come forward- they live in isolation and fear. So, when one brave person finally does come forward, that will encourage them to do so. But it is not piling on.
I have heard of many other Ayres victims out there who have not and will not ever come forward. They don't want to feel the shame; they fear being stigmatized. If I know of these victims - then think of how many others are out there around the country.
I strongly urge you to educate up on the history of how multiple abuse cases are reported. There is a lot of material out there. And please don't judge until you have been a victim yourself. You can't possibly know what it's liike to come forward until you've been there.
Response to "Roscoe Beedle" -
If any of the people making accusations against Ayres are lying or embellishing thier stories with an eye to getting money from some yet-to-be launched civil lawsuit, it seems to me that that there would be discrepancies in thier stories could be detected during the criminal trail. If any of Ayres accusers have made up stories, they should know that they are committing a crime by lying to the police and prosecutors.
As to Roscoe Beedle's question "how do you defend yourself against charges over something that happened years ago with no witnesses?" the answer to that is what Ayres is doing now - he's denying that there was any molestation and saying that the accusers may have "adjusted" thier memories of his (allegedly) legitimate physical exams. (Ayres, who is not a fool, should have known and anticipated that such "misinterpretations" of his admitted penchant for undressing male patients might be a result of these "exams", which, I repeat, may be considered "routine" by him but are absolutely not by virtually all of his peers in child psychiatry)
A better question for you to ask, Roscoe Beedle, is "WHY were criminal charges brought against Ayres over something that happened years ago with no witnesses?"
- the answer is that MULTIPLE FORMER PATIENTS OF AYRES, WHO DID NOT KNOW EACH OTHER AND HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE OTHERS CASES TOLD VERY SIMILAR STORIES OF AYRES MAKING THEM UNDERGO "EXAMS" IN WHICH HE TOUCHED/FONDLED/MASTURBATED THIER GENITALS
The fact that accusers who did not know each others' stories told similar stories provides CORROBORATION.
The first concern has to be that justice is done in the case of Dr. Ayres.
I can sympathize with your disquiet that the County of San Mateo may be subjected to lawsuits over this, but that has got to be a separate matter from determining whether Ayres's habit of "exam"-giving was pedoplilic abuse or legitimate. As I've said before, I don't think Ayres' assertion that "exams" were routine and legitimate is going to fly.
Sappho
05-04-2007, 03:43 PM
The amount of money survivors of sexual abuse get in a lawsuit is minuscule compared to the damage the abuse does to our lives. Coming forward takes tremendous courage. Defense attorneys drag victims and survivors through the mud. Here someone who doesn't even know the victims is already questioning their motives, stigmatizing them, making it harder for other victims to come forward.
After my abuser died, we discovered he had married two other women with 11 yr. old daughters and was engaged to a third--that makes four young girls he victimized, that we know of. None of his victims ever pressed charges. We were all afraid for our lives and our families' lives. Later, we were embarrassed and ashamed. 30 years later, my mother still insists that I not tell the rest of the family about the incest, because she is embarrassed. It's like I was in a train wreck that took years to recover from, and I'm not supposed to tell anyone about it. My relatives wonder why I spent so many years in poverty, like I'm some kind of lowlife. I didn't get any emotional support in my recovery, because Mother was embarrassed by my ordeal. Ayres's victims are going through the same thing. They need support, not censure.
I wonder how many of Ayres's victims have remained silent because their mothers and fathers don't want to be embarrassed? It is a terrible thing to suffer in silence. It is a terrible thing to break the silence and be re-victimized by ignorant people in public forums. Kudos to the brave men who have come forward. You are heroes.
Taylor
05-07-2007, 05:51 PM
Sappho -
Thanks for coming forward and being so honest. I, too, did not get any support from my family when I came forward to say I was molested by a relative. They were more concerned about "what people would think" than what happened to me.
Be that as it may, all victims of abuse must continue to come forward. This is the only way to break the chain of abuse.
And maybe, some day, we can succeed in educating people like Roscoe Beedle.
Sappho
05-08-2007, 05:51 PM
Taylor--
You are brave to come forward, too. Molestation is one of the few crimes where the victim can lose his or her family, just for being a crime victim. This happens even if the perpetrator wasn't a relative. For the past 8 years I've run an online support group for survivors of sexual abuse and assault. Almost none of us have supportive families.
The brighter predators, like Dr. Ayres, profile their victims based on their families. My stepfather picked children with no men in their families to protect them. He tested my mother and widowed grandmother to see how they responded to embarrassing situations before marrying my mother. Dr. Ayres chose children who were ordered by the court to see him, so their families were troubled, and not credible--because what kind of parents produce a child who needs court-ordered therapy? I've seen similar scenarios over and over again.
If you were molested or sexually abused, it is never too late to seek help. The abuse was not your fault. It is never the child's fault. Many teens think it is their fault, because the abuser told them it was their fault, or their families told them it was their fault when they came forward. It was not your fault and you are not alone. Recovery is possible. Visit http://RAINN.net for resources and a 24 hr. hotline, or http://www.sfwar.org for San Francisco Women Against Rape, which serves people of all genders.
Taylor
05-08-2007, 06:13 PM
Sappho-
Check your private message box.
Thanks.
Michael Stogner
05-08-2007, 06:26 PM
People did not "keep quiet" about it for so long. There were complaints about Ayres dating back many years. If you have read the coverage of the story, two abuse accusations came from delinquents sent to Ayres for evaluation, and one was declared "unfounded" due to police bungling and loss of evidence (the $1000 "hush money" check Ayres allegedly sent an accuser's mother in 1987)
People are fearful to come forward because it is embarrassing and painful to talk.
Ultimately it will come down to he said-he said situation and the jury will have to decide who is more credible. The accusers will tell thier stories and Ayres will tell his. I just think that it is Ayres who has a credibility problem - but, yes, the case will be decided at trial, where the veracity of the acccusers' stories, and Ayres' explanations can be weighed.
I would just say that, from what I have read, Ayres does not appear to be innocent. At the very least he seems to have an inappropriate intererest in examining boys' - and ONLY boys' genitals, and I have yet to hear about any such exams performed on girls. Ayres should not get a pass just because he's a doctor, and whether there is a "standard of care" for child shrinks that includes intimate physical exams in NOT for Ayres himself to decide. That will be for Ayres reputable peers to determine. Ayres can not, on his own, decide that seeing if a boy has pubic hair or not is important to his psychiatric treatment of them.
Police Files do not just get lost....Some officer removed them on purpose.
Lets find out who had them last, and did Marta Diaz ever have knowlege of them.
Taylor
05-11-2007, 02:25 PM
I understand there was another court hearing for Ayres today. Apparently his lawyer has said he wants to file to suppress the list of patient names the police siezed last year, but so far they have not done so.
I don't want this thing to drag on on and on !
And if anyone who is reading this has a son who was molested by Ayres, and who has not yet contacted prosecutor Melissa McKowan, please do so. I know of at least four victims who have not yet come forward. I know there are many out there. Victims: Staying silent on this matter will only eat away at you.. please come forward and speak up !
Now, it seems Ayres's lawyer is going to try to invalidate the search warrant of his records, which led to the finding of victims he molested recently enough to be withing criminal statute. Apparently, Weinberg (Ayres' lawyer) dug up a 1988 case in which a search warrant on a therapist accused of sexually molesting a minor was invalidated because it "violated psychotherapist-patient privilege"
Is this ridiculous or what? These sleazebags are saying, one: "those kids are lying and/or reacting to suggestions placed in thier heads" then, two: "You got nuthin' on me because I have double-extra-special doctor privileges!"
What happened to hearing the victims out, so Weinberg can show that the accusers' "memories are fragile and vulnerable things"?
You know what else is "fragile and vulnerable"? Ayres story that he was just giving "physical exams"!
It is really frustrating to see Ayres use his wealth and status as a doctor to escape accountability. I hope he won't succeed.
Taylor
05-14-2007, 06:15 AM
Some of the victims of Ayres came forward on their own after seeing news stories, and they are within statute. So even if the lawyer succeeds - and I doubt he will- there are still victims the police did not contact who came forward.
Also, I am hearing that there is a new civil suit against Ayres in the works by victims right now, and that their lawyer is representing several victims. So if by chance the criminal case doesn't work out,(but I believe it will) the civil case will. If there are any victims out there who need more information about the civil suit, you can send me a private message on this forum.
nitamac
05-18-2007, 01:55 AM
What I cannot understand is why would the Judge grant him bail. He is being accused of melosting children. Child molesters do not ever stop molesting it is a sickness like an Alcoholic that cannot stop drinking to save there own lifes. He is a danger to our children. Why take another chance with Ayres having access to children he has been accused to many time and has gotten away with. Why wouldn't he do it again he thinks he well always get away with it.
Don't forget that Ayres evaluated boys for the San Mateo courts for decades, has friends there, and in the words of his attorney, Doron Weinberg, he's a "recognized community leader"
At first his bail was set at 1.5 million, then a friendly judge slashed it to $250,000, which was no problem for Ayres - his wife posted it in cash the next business day. Then after more victims came forward and more charges were lodged against Ayres. Bail was upped to $750,000 - still no problem for the well-heeled Mr. Ayres. His wife poduced a cash bond for that immediately
I agree that he's sexual predator and he's a threat to children, and he ought to be in jail right now - but apparently, the fact that he's retired from his practice and that he's (in the eyes of Doron Weinberg) a "community leader" convinced the judge that he's not likely to offend again, at least until he's back in court.
Whats most upsetting about this guy is that he's got to be aware of how children are damaged by sexual abuse, and yet he inflicted it on boys for years and years. He and Weinberg maintain that its all just a big misunderstanding that will be explained later (as soon as they can cook up a suitable cover story - that will be a sight to behold) Hey, "memories get adjusted" - because we all know how fun it is to come forward and say you were sexually abused as a child. It so fun that dozens of people make up stories (sorry, "adjust" thier memories) to get in on the action!
I wonder if Ayres really believes that his "examinations" (funny how Weinberg doesn't address that inconvenient aspect of Ayres' "innocence" when he talks to reporters) of boys were medically legitimate and that the fondling and masturbation of boys didn't really happen - Weinberg expects people to believe that these stories from his grown-up victims are actually "adjusted" memories of Ayres 100% normal, routine physicals. Did Ayres tell the boys' parents about these "physicals"? Did he maintain records of his "physicals"?
city driver
05-18-2007, 08:15 PM
thats deep.
nitamac
05-18-2007, 11:08 PM
Don't forget that Ayres evaluated boys for the San Mateo courts for decades, has friends there, and in the words of his attorney, Doron Weinberg, he's a "recognized community leader"
At first his bail was set at 1.5 million, then a friendly judge slashed it to $250,000, which was no problem for Ayres - his wife posted it in cash the next business day. Then after more victims came forward and more charges were lodged against Ayres. Bail was upped to $750,000 - still no problem for the well-heeled Mr. Ayres. His wife poduced a cash bond for that immediately
I agree that he's sexual predator and he's a threat to children, and he ought to be in jail right now - but apparently, the fact that he's retired from his practice and that he's (in the eyes of Doron Weinberg) a "community leader" convinced the judge that he's not likely to offend again, at least until he's back in court.
Whats most upsetting about this guy is that he's got to be aware of how children are damaged by sexual abuse, and yet he inflicted it on boys for years and years. He and Weinberg maintain that its all just a big misunderstanding that will be explained later (as soon as they can cook up a suitable cover story - that will be a sight to behold) Hey, "memories get adjusted" - because we all know how fun it is to come forward and say you were sexually abused as a child. It so fun that dozens of people make up stories (sorry, "adjust" thier memories) to get in on the action!
I wonder if Ayres really believes that his "examinations" (funny how Weinberg doesn't address that inconvenient aspect of Ayres' "innocence" when he talks to reporters) of boys were medically legitimate and that the fondling and masturbation of boys didn't really happen - Weinberg expects people to believe that these stories from his grown-up victims are actually "adjusted" memories of Ayres 100% normal, routine physicals. Did Ayres tell the boys' parents about these "physicals"? Did he maintain records of his "physicals"?My son was seen by Ayres and I was not told about it until just recently and it was a few years ago! he say's nothing happened he is now in prison.
Taylor
05-19-2007, 04:02 AM
Zush -
Ayres told reporters in March 2006 that he had retired from practise on January 1. But that wasn't true. He was still seeing patients and doing consulting work when the police raided his place in March. He can't stop seeing boys ! I am wondering if he is still finding a way to have access to them. I know that pedophiles can't stop.
Taylor
05-19-2007, 04:06 AM
NitaMac-
Are you SURE nothing happened to your son ? Did you see that the professional cyclist Greg Lemond was molested as a very little kid ? He didn't come forward until recently. He said that keeping it a secret was killing him and that when he did start to talk about it with his wife, he needed a full bottle of whiskey in him.
Something like 85 % of kids who are molested will never come forward.
You are brave to confront this issue and to have talked to your son about it ! Some boys won't admit to it right away... but will eventually.
Taylor
06-05-2007, 07:42 AM
To any Ayres victims and their parents who are reading this forum: There is someone working within the Ayres organization - most likely a private investigator - who has been calling people and pretending to be a distraught father of an Ayres victim and trying to pump them for information about the prosecutor's case. He uses different aliases and gives different details but it is the same guy.
DO NOT TALK TO HIM. The only people you should be talking to are the people in the San Mateo prosecutor's office.
Michael Stogner
06-10-2007, 07:23 AM
He should have recused himself.....for personal relationship
It has just come to my attention the Judge Thomas Smith, not only knows Dr. William Ayres personally, He referred boys to Dr. Ayres when he was the Judge in charge of Hillcrest.
This Judge reduced Dr. William Ayres bail from $1,500,000 to $250,000
Hon. Judge Thomas Smith is the same Judge who Abused his Descretion....
according to the Apellate Court in San Francisco when his raised the bail from $300,000 to $3,000,000 in the Edith Delgado case.
nitamac
06-10-2007, 04:10 PM
He should have recused himself.....for personal relationship
It has just come to my attention the Judge Thomas Smith, not only knows Dr. William Ayres personally, He referred boys to Dr. Ayres when he was the Judge in charge of Hillcrest.
This Judge reduced Dr. William Ayres bail from $1,500,000 to $250,000
Hon. Judge Thomas Smith is the same Judge who Abused his Descretion....
according to the Apellate Court in San Francisco when his raised the bail from $300,000 to $3,000,000 in the Edith Delgado case.
WoW! that is all i can say about this right now.
Taylor
06-11-2007, 11:12 AM
Isn't the current judge Carl Holm ? Has he had a personal/professional relationship with Ayres ?
Michael Stogner
06-11-2007, 01:56 PM
Isn't the current judge Carl Holm ? Has he had a personal/professional relationship with Ayres ?
The two Judges Hon. Judge Carl Holm and Hon. Judge Marta Diaz both worked at the San Mateo County District Attorneys Office under the leadership of James P. Fox back in the late 80's.
I have no information that Hon. Judge Carl Holm personally knows Dr. William Ayres, or has referred any male children to him as a professional.
Does anyone have any information on this topic?
nitamac
06-13-2007, 11:44 PM
Does anybody know if Judge Holm had any thing to do with Juvenile cases?
shadow
06-14-2007, 11:17 AM
What on Earth are people thinking? Why would anyone in their right mind stick up for this guy??????
A Creep is a Creep and that's all there is to it!
Taylor
06-16-2007, 05:52 AM
TT94062-
I sent you a private message. Check your messages. The prosecutor's office needs to know that Ayres told you not to wait in the waiting room while your son saw Ayres. That's just bizarre ! Wonder why he didn't want you there... gee. could it be because you would be cramping his "style" ?
Taylor
06-18-2007, 03:13 PM
Can anyone tell me what Ayres' July 5 court date is ? Is it the preliminary hearing, finally ? Or is this when Ayres' lawyer tries to get the search warrant thrown out ?
shadow
06-19-2007, 06:24 PM
This story is not getting the attention it deserves.
Why is it that this whole thing is taking so long?
Has anybody contacted Nancy Grace?
Taylor
06-19-2007, 06:36 PM
I am told that Michael Savage has been savaging Ayres on his national radio program. He keeps pounding this point home : What child psychiatrist in the United States gives physicals to any kids ?
If there is anyone out there whose kids' psychiatrists made them strip and examined them - well, I would like to hear from them.
katherine m
06-20-2007, 09:10 AM
How do you know so much about Dr. Etta Bryant?
katherine m
06-20-2007, 10:32 AM
How does Onbek know so much about this case?
Taylor
06-26-2007, 04:46 AM
I read that the DA's office believes that the majority of Ayres' victims came from Hillcrest Juvenile Hall and the courts. DA Steve Wagstaffe said that Ayres threatened a young boy who didn't like what Ayres was doing to him. The boy said that Ayres told him, "Who's going to believe you, a troubled youth, over me?"
Well, at this juncture Dr. Ayres, I will believe every single kid over you any time !
I am wondering if Ayres ever tried to make a deal with the juveniles. Maybe he said to them,"If you let me do this to you, then I'll make sure you get a light sentence or no sentence." Seems to me that this guy got his kicks from his dangerous behavior. What's to say that he didn't make a pact with the juveniles ? Maybe those kids won't come forward because they are afraid they'll have to go to jail now.. But they won't. It's Ayres who will be put in jail for his behavior - not you. We need you to come forward to the police.
Michael Stogner
07-05-2007, 10:38 AM
Dr. William Ayres next appearance for Prelimary Hearing is
August 7, 2007 9:00AM
Taylor
07-05-2007, 01:02 PM
I have heard that when the molestation civil suit against Ayres was being settled in 2005, that Judge Diaz was making her views loud and clear in the courthouse that the police better be careful in investigating Ayres, because she and Ayres were friends.
In 1987, Diaz was the supervising attorney in the San Mateo branch of the DA's office. Did police officers Rick Nielsen and Lee Violett- both friends of Diaz - go to her about Ayres- and then she told them to stop investigating ? At what point did San Mateo PD's file on Greg Hogue - along with the check for $1000 that Ayres sent to the Hogue family after the cops confronted him - go missing ? Was Diaz aware of this check ? Did someone dispose of the file ? The Chronicle reporter John Cote has written about this check and touched on the Diaz/Ayres connection, but someone needs to go deeper.
If the DA's office had prosecuted Ayres back in 1987, we wouldn't have Diaz continuing to send boys to Ayres for the next 20 years - boys who continued to be molested .
Anyone know anything about Diaz's intense friendship with Ayres ?
Michael Stogner
07-06-2007, 08:04 AM
In this article it does not mention the San Mateo Police Investigated Dr. William Ayres in 1987.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=77333
Taylor
08-01-2007, 08:49 AM
The Dr. Ayres preliminary hearing is Tuesday August 7 at 9:00 am. The prosecutor is expected to put on a half day's worth of evidence.
So far, I have heard Ayres' lawyer make up every excuse in the book about the victims --- they "imagined" the whole thing; they "misinterpreted " the exams ( physical exams by the way, which no other child psychiatrist in America is known to do) or that the victims who have come forward are it for the publicity.
What man for god's sake would want to come forward to say he was molested for publicity ? It is incredibly painful to testify.. This is just nonsense.
Also, in a victim's civil suit against Ayres in 2005, Ayres gave about four different explanations for the "physicals". First he says he has maybe given three physicals to boys over the years. Then he says he never asked a boy to take his pants down....He's all over the map.
He also says he never gave kids presents ( this is the "grooming" technique that pedophiles use. But there are dozens and dozens of boy patients who said he did. I know of one victim who was taken by Ayres on weekend shopping trips to the Talbot's hobby section. Ayres bought him tons of presents and never charged the boy's parents.....Ayres also denies in his deposition ever buying a present for a kid at Talbots. Sounds to me like he spent thousands of dollars over the years doing just that.
neverforget
08-04-2007, 09:28 AM
I wish all the victims and there families the very best of luck on getting there long overdue justice. I do not feel Ayres deserves the title Doctor so from now on i well refer to him only as Ayres.
Taylor
08-07-2007, 07:39 PM
Apparently, Detective Rick Decker put on some very compelling evidence against Ayres. Since Attorney General Jerry Brown suspended Ayres' medical license in April, I will no longer refer to him as "Dr. " Ayres.
The arraignment is scheduled for September.
Michael Stogner
08-07-2007, 09:49 PM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/ci_6565582
Michael Stogner
08-08-2007, 07:44 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=78849
Taylor
08-08-2007, 09:02 AM
I heard that Ayres gave one of the young boys a rectal exam ?????!!! How does this fit into child psychiatry ? All of these kids had pediatricians, for God's sake.
It's clear the only reason Ayres didn't become a pediatrician is because parents are in the room with kids when they are examined. He knew as a psychiatrist that everything that takes place is between the patient and the shrink, where he would be free to molest them. And remember that poster on this site who said that Ayres asked her to leave the waiting room ? Now we know why.
I have been following this case since Ayres arrest because of my close friend's personal association to it as a family member of a victim. I sat through yesterdays hearing and was personally taken back by the victim accounts related by Detective Decker. I too commend the very thorough case that was presented by Decker and the DA. I know the San Mateo police have been criticized for their handling of the earlier case but it is obvious now that the new cases are in the right hands with Decker. He was very professional and was clearly unaffected by the Ayres' attorney in his attempt to cross examine him about the facts. Its too bad Decker didn't handle some of the original cases. Ayres would be in jail already
Ayres' recent explanation of his "exams", "When you are treating someone, you treat the whole person" is laughable. It's odd to see Doron Weinberg attacking the credibility of Ayres' accusers, when his client's rationalizations are so implausible - Ayres is now a holistic healer, we're asked to believe, and his unique "mind-body" treatments have been "misunderstood"
Do you think Weinberg believes his own bull****? Would he be so sanguine about Ayres' innocence and skeptical of the accusers' motives if it were his son who'd been "examined" by Ayres?
And there's one real problem with Ayres' alibi - how come Ayres apparently never took notes about his "exams" on boys? Or informed the parents. That's kind of odd, don't you think?
Taylor
08-08-2007, 04:58 PM
Detective Decker seems compassionate and respectful of the victims and he really understands this case inside and out. I too wish he had been on the case years ago. Well, we have the right man now.
Nora - I sent you a private message, so check your mail box.
Taylor
08-14-2007, 06:45 AM
The police and DA's office would still like to hear from victims who have not yet come forward. This includes victims who are out of statute as well. Their testimony can bolster the case for those within statute.
Call Detective Decker :650-522-7654. I have heard that he is very good at interviewing - very professional and also very sensitive.
Taylor
08-26-2007, 07:26 AM
One of the many absurd theories Ayres' lawyer has been floating is that the the boys weren't molested by Ayres - but by one of his former partners in his medical group ! Not only is this sleazy, but it smacks of desperation. I imagine that this could backfire on the Ayres team in a big way. And won't that make the former partner do everything he can to help the prosecution ?
I am wondering if Ayres will enter a plea deal.
Taylor
08-27-2007, 06:13 PM
I keep hearing that Judge Marta Diaz interfered with the police investigation into Dr. Ayres. When this was, I am not sure- yet . Though I think it was in 2002=2003. Shouldn't Diaz be investigated by the state Judicial Commission on Oversight for her actions ? Why would a juvenile judge, whose job is supposedly to protect kids, instead leap to the defense of a child psychiatrist who has been accused multiple,multiple times of molestation - going back as far as 1966 ?
I think it's time to clean house in San Mateo in terms of juvenile judges.
neverforget
08-28-2007, 12:29 AM
Not just in the juvenile courts how about some cleaning up in the Redwood City Police Department.
Michael Stogner
08-28-2007, 07:28 AM
I keep hearing that Judge Marta Diaz interfered with the police investigation into Dr. Ayres. When this was, I am not sure- yet . Though I think it was in 2002=2003. Shouldn't Diaz be investigated by the state Judicial Commission on Oversight for her actions ? Why would a juvenile judge, whose job is supposedly to protect kids, instead leap to the defense of a child psychiatrist who has been accused multiple,multiple times of molestation - going back as far as 1966 ?
I think it's time to clean house in San Mateo in terms of juvenile judges.
The Greg Hogue allegations/investigation of 1987 is where the alleged interference should be investigated. Marta Diaz worked for James P. Fox at that time.
Taylor
09-06-2007, 02:03 PM
Also, I see that Ayres just filed a lawsuit against an insurance company - American Special Risk Insurance, Inc. Presumably this is the company that wouldn't shell out $$$ to help him out in his molestation civil suit in 2005. Maybe he needs the money for the criminal trial.
The guy's got a lot to be concerned about.
Well, perhaps it's starting to dawn on Ayres' defense that thier pretext that Ayres's patients had mistaken legitimate "exams" for abuse (or even - and this is pretty crazed - that someone else molested them and they've mistakenly identified Ayres as the culprit) probably will not be very convincing to a jury.
So, we can now expect all sorts of motions and delaying tactics and technical challenges to the search warrant, the statute of limitations, etc.
It is in Ayres's intrest to extend the process as long as possible and complicate it as much as possible because, simply, the truth is not on his side. His excuses stink and he knows it.
There's going to be a lot of legal game-playing but very little in the way of vindictating evidence on Ayres's side. When you're caught lying (under oath), as Ayres has been about the extent of his "exams", a "he-said, he-said" dispute with several dozen people who have said under oath that you abused them isn't likely to go in your favor.
neverforget
09-09-2007, 02:10 AM
I do not understand:confused: why would the Judge allow Ayres lawyer to waist the court time with all his game-playing. let get on with this trial already!:mad:
When you have an elderly perv as a client whose guilt is fairly obvious, what do you do? Try to run out the clock.
The reasoning behind Ayres' lawyer's challenge to the search warrant makes Ayres "right to privacy" more important than protecting the public from a child sexual predator. It will be a long shot to get a judge to agree.
Without a search warrant to get a criminal case, Ayres would still be in practice, more than likely continuing to inflict his "physical exams" on young boys.
The doctor-patient/therapist-client privilege is not designed to shield doctors from their own wrongdoing.
Additionally, Weinberg also seems to overestimate what's possible for the defense to achieve, even if - and it’s a real stretch - even if he can get a judge to agree that the search of Ayres' records was improper. Even if the search warrant is judged improper, the boys Ayres abused, whose testimony Weinberg seeks to invalidate as "fruit of the poisoned tree", can still come back and file another case against Ayres. But, that, of course, will take more time - years and years, and it may not be Weinberg's problem at that point. Perhaps he's counting on Ayres croaking before he ever has to face a jury.
What's most laughable is Weinberg's claim that this case is so very very complicated - what he means is it's complicated for HIM, because he has to come up with some excuse for Ayres to be doing "exams" on boys. Yeah, that's "complicated" - he still hasn't figured out exactly what to say Ayres was up to. A jury will be able to suss what was really going on, which is actually pretty simple. He gets young boys alone in his office - young enough not to question what he's doing, makes them strip and plays with their genitals. And he's done it over and over and over for 40 years. The evidence for that is pretty overwhelming.
Despite Weinberg's claim that the chances for "erroneous recollection, suggestion, transference” are great, does he really think that 40 witnesses telling similar stories won't be seen by a jury as corroborating each other?
Weinberg is just delaying and playing games. I'm sure he knows his client is guilty, and that there's precious little chance that he's going to convince a jury that Ayres's "physical exams" on boys were legitimate, so his goal is delay, delay, delay.
Taylor
09-12-2007, 05:56 AM
I have learned that many mental health professionals - some of whom worked for San Mateo County Mental Health services - knew what Ayres was up to and yet failed to report him to authorities, as they were mandated to by law. Instead of reporting Ayres, they simply stopped sending boys to Ayres. Great !
I also know of a pediatrician who referred boys to Ayres. One father asked the pediatrician if it was normal for Ayres to be making his kids strip and showing them "anatomical drawings." And what did this pediatrician do ? According to the father, all he did was "sidestep the question and look uncomfortable."
If I know of four people like this doctor , how many others are there out there who failed to address what was happening in San Mateo's backyard ? And why did it take someone from outside San Mateo County to alert the County as to what was going on ?
Wilson
10-03-2007, 05:44 PM
Is there any news in the Dr. Ayres case ? Does anyone know how many victims have come forward ?
katherine m
10-08-2007, 04:34 PM
I saw that someone posted there that Ayres is looking more and more like Ted Kaczynski - the Unabomber- every day and that he wears a baseball cap (to hide ? I do not know ) and that he drives a beat-up BMW, lives in a rented condo and files frivolous lawsuits against his former medical partners.
katherine m
10-23-2007, 07:11 AM
The case is hard on the parents of the victims of Ayres. A mother of a victim was at the symphony not long ago. She was startled to see that Ayres was there as well. He walked right by her. It ruined her evening.
nitamac
11-02-2007, 07:32 PM
I do not understand why former Calleagues of Ayres are not comming forward. I am sure there are some who had to have know what the HELL was going on in Ayres Office. Why would they turn the other cheek, what about there moral ethics. What about all the Young Boys that are now Men! I can only guess but i bet most of Ayres victims are in prison because the system has let them down. The one's who are in prison now have know way of knowing this trial is about to take place. They deserve Justice and to see Ayres be punished for his sick acts.
I'm of the opinion that much of psychiatry is a scam, and many people in the so-called "helping" professions are led into thier fields by dark motives. There seems to be an equivalent of the "blue wall of silence" among psychiatrists - an unwillingness to expose a member of one's own "in-group" to outside scrutiny.
Apparently, although none of Ayres's colleagues cared enough to look into his habit of giving nude physical exams to boys, rumors about him did circulate among his peers and some of them suspected enough to not refer children to him.
What angers me is that his partners in his own psychiatric practice, when they questioned Ayres about undressing a boy, accepted his bogus explanation that he needed to know what the boy was "dealing with", and that necessitated a nude, full-body exam. Ayres' partners just accepted that - even though it was outrageous, then and now. Was it ever okay for a doctor - especially one who treats the mind, not the body, to put a boy through an invasive experience he clearly did not want, just so the doctor can satisfy his curiosity about the boy's penis? I do not see any other way to undertand Ayres's supposed need to see "what he's dealing with" than as a creepy sexual interest, barely disguised as some sort of "medical" procedure
Finally it seems like Ayres may actually have to pay for decades of victimizing children. His excuse that he was giving legitimate medical exams which were "misinterpreted" or somehow "recast as abuse" in memory will not wash with a jury if it has any common sense. Hopefully Ayres will have a lot of time in prison to think about what he did to all those kids. And frankly, I hope that the other prisoners there make it an unpleasant time for him
katherine m
11-10-2007, 06:21 AM
It sounds like a parent of an Ayres victim wrote this to the Burlingame Daily News on Sept 23, 2007:
http://www.topix.com/forum/source/burlingame-daily-news/THJ0L2T6VHVCAOKP7
"Shame on Peninsula Psychiatric Associates for performing a so called peer review on Ayres and believing in his practise. That is the problem with medicine today. In general you will never find that peer reviews turn out for the protection of the patient. All the evidence is held in a shroud of secrecy, doctors are self governing and they will never turn in a colleague no matter how harmful their behavior. Dr. Ridlehuber is speaking only because he is retired and will not be shunned by other doctors. Shame on you Ridlehuber ! Shame on the rest of the associates, Dr. Ronnie Sue Leith, Etta Bryant, Piero Cerruti, etc ... Shame on all the doctors in his own medical group who probably didn't do these physicals but allowed him to hurt the children in San Mateo County."
These are excellent points. Read the rest of the insightful letter at the above link.
Michael Stogner
11-20-2007, 07:23 AM
Dr. William Ayres bail was $1,500,000, reduced by Friend Hon Judge Thomas Smith to $250,000, increased to half the original bail $750,000 after more victims were added.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=83549
shadow
11-22-2007, 06:38 AM
What did Dr. Etta Bryant know and when did she know it ? She wrote a letter defending Ayres' practise of giving physicals to boys back in 2006.
But a television reporter called all the child psychiatrists in the Bay Area and he can not find one who says they gave physical exams to kids.
What on earth was Bryant thinking ?
All of Ayres partners knew he was doing physicals. They had complaints from parents about this. Why did no one report Ayres to the Medical
Board ?
And what did psychologist Al Fricke know about Ayres and when did he know it ?
Taylor
11-29-2007, 03:02 PM
In Connecticut today they found a collection of thousands of pornographic pictures of young children in the former home of the late Dr. George Reardon. These were pictures of his former patients.
There are striking similarities between his case and Dr. William Ayres. They both told kids that they were doing their physicals under the guise of some ridiculous medical reason...
Boy, these doctors who molest kids are all beginning to sound like they all knew each other and compared notes... Did Ayres take pictures ? Has he gotten them hidden away somewhere ?
And like Ayres, Reardon once worked in Boston. They were both there at the same time.
In the Harford Courant story on the late Dr. Reardon's collection of homemade child pornography I noticed that among Dr. Reardon's excuses for suspicious "physical exams" (which, as a pediatrician, he had quite more of a legitimate-seeming pretext for than Ayres, a psychiatrist) was this: "He claimed that he was conducting growth studies — his area of expertise was childhood sexual development — and he would manipulate the genitals of children"
Gosh! So I guess we should not be surpised that when Ayres' partners asked him why he was undressing little boys in his office, Ridlehuber and company were perfectly satisfied when Ayres said he needed to see "the psycho-sexual development of a boy to really know what a boy was dealing with" - because for Ayres, like Dr. Reardon, looking at the genitals of child patients was all in day's work, and of course, 100% innocent. Until of course, scores of hidden porn photos turn up hidden in a cache somewhere, or dozens of former patients come forward saying that the doctor's contact went well beyond "examinations"
I'm thankful that unlike Dr. Reardon, Dr. Ayres may have to face time behind bars for his sexual abuse, not just a slap on the wrist and a quick "retirement"
katherine m
11-30-2007, 05:55 AM
Zush -
Dr. Reardon was an endocrinologist, not a pediatrician. He studied hormones. He claimed that he was conducting growth studies and that is how he convinced the children that he needed to touch them - and do worse.
It is not just Ayres and Reardon. There are many other documented cases in this country in which doctors have used excuses like the above to molest little kids.
Taylor
12-07-2007, 09:32 AM
So ,that KGO talk show host Bernie Ward who has been charged with possession of child porn on the internet has gone and hired Doron Weinberg. Weinberg is also Dr.Ayres' lawyer. Anyone see a pattern here ?
The Drudge Report posted the Bernie Ward child porn story last night because somebody from Weinberg's team is blaming Ward's troubles on George Bush !! Yikes, that's quite a stretch.
Maybe he'll try that line of defense in the Ayres trial too. I can just picture Weinberg now, telling the jury that the Ayres molestation case is all Bush's
fault !
efto1
12-07-2007, 10:13 AM
So ,that KGO talk show host Bernie Ward who has been charged with possession of child porn on the internet has gone and hired Doron Weinberg. Weinberg is also Dr.Ayres' lawyer. Anyone see a pattern here ?
The Drudge Report posted the Bernie Ward child porn story last night because somebody from Weinberg's team is blaming Ward's troubles on George Bush !! Yikes, that's quite a stretch.
Maybe he'll try that line of defense in the Ayres trial too. I can just picture Weinberg now, telling the jury that the Ayres molestation case is all Bush's
fault !
If it's Bush's fault he did not tell Pat Tillman's parents that when the Army set him in an antiwar unit, as Tillman's unit took him for a ride, shot him a couple of times, set him in for a silver star, and plucked one off the shoulders of a top ranked general, then the libertarians can blame Bush for any hairbrained plan they choose, except maybe blowing up dikes that ruined black homes in New Oreleans then letting the gays that live in the French Quarter dance in the streets with joy!
Sappho
12-08-2007, 06:27 PM
Roscoe, there are many reasons for molestation survivors to stay silent. Fear and shame are the two biggies. There is such a stigma on molestation victims, especially boys. If molested by a man, they are sneered at as effeminate or homosexual. Gay males who get molested often hate their sexuality because they think being molested "made them gay." Imagine the horror of your first sexual encounter being forced, when you were a child. Would you want to remember? Or tell anybody?
I am an incest survivor. I was so embarrassed by my stepfather's actions that I never thought of telling anyone until I was an adult. I just wanted to pretend it wasn't happening. My stepfather threatened to kill me, the whole family, and anyone I told, followed by suicide. I didn't understand why he felt the need to threaten me, when I was embarrassed to death. I wanted to kill myself from shame. I tried it a couple times, too.
When I finally told my mother (after her husband left her for a woman with a younger daughter) she blamed me! I was the little tramp who seduced her husband. WTF? I was a painfully shy, 12 yr. old bookworm when the pedophile started his abuse. I didn't know anything about men, being raised without a father or grandfather. I was totally naive, yet starved for paternal affection. When he betrayed me, I thought it was my fault for loving my stepfather.
I was kicked out of my extended family, lest I embarrass my mother by telling the rest of the family. Less naive victims don't tell their families because they know they will be blamed and/or not believed. The pain of being rejected--not believed, or blamed for the abuse, is almost as bad as the abuse itself. It's yet another betrayal.
Why tell? It isn't going to make your own pain stop, you think to yourself. Too often the authorities don't do anything, don't save other children from the predator. Kids came forward, and Ayres was still allowed to practice. So why re-traumatize yourself by coming forward?
In reality, every time I tell, it gets a little better. No one has been killed, as my stepfather is long dead. No one except my mother has ever blamed me, or accused me of lying. But I didn't know telling would help until I had therapy. It took years of therapy and support from my survivor group before I could tell people.
If you survived Ayres' abuse, it wasn't your fault and you are not alone. It is safe to come forward. He can never abuse you again. You can get free, anonymous phone counseling from http://rainn.net 24-7.
Thanks for telling your story, Sappho. I think what you said completely explains why kids don't just reflexively run out to tell somebody when they've been molested by an adult, right after it happens. Most especially when someone in your own family is the perpetrator. It seems strange, but many adults, when they think about the trauma caused by sexual abuse on a child, can't seem to imagine what it might be like in the mind of a child - to feel a mix of guilt, shame and insecurity and hoping you can just make the experience go away by keeping silent about it.
Michael Stogner
12-11-2007, 08:49 PM
James P. Fox finally speaks up.
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=84414
Jim speaks about Michael Vicks instead of the Dr. William Ayres case.
Jim has made no comment on the Cardell Brown case where 5 boys were sexually assulted by a San Mateo County employee..the boys were sent to Mr. Cardell Brown from the fine people of Hillcrest Juvie Hall....
I invite the ordinary citizens of San Mateo County to Google Cardell Brown's name and see how many articles were published. What are James P. Fox's and Steve Wagstaffe statements re: Cardell Brown.
James P. Fox tough on Michael Vicks...but he supports Child Molesters.
Taylor
12-17-2007, 03:21 PM
Today Ayres' lawyer tried to get the search warrant thrown out, and was denied. This is a victory for the 40 plus victims of Ayres who have come forward to date, as well as for the hundreds out there who have yet to come forward.
Ayre's lawyer has just been hired by Phil Spector. Sounds like he's stretched a little thin.
Michael Stogner
12-17-2007, 04:17 PM
Today Ayres' lawyer tried to get the search warrant thrown out, and was denied. This is a victory for the 40 plus victims of Ayres who have come forward to date, as well as for the hundreds out there who have yet to come forward.
Ayre's lawyer has just been hired by Phil Spector. Sounds like he's stretched a little thin.
Taylor, Thank You for the update.......good work
katherine m
12-17-2007, 04:18 PM
but he will not win. There are too many victims out there - over 40 who have come forward. It is not too late for others to come forward. Onbekendebron - are you listening ? Call Detective Rick Decker at the San Mateo PD.
Michael Stogner
12-17-2007, 09:29 PM
The best thing about the Dr. William Ayres case is Hon. Judge John Runde
He is not a personal friend of the good Dr. like Hon. Judge Thomas Smith who reduced his bail from $1,500,000 to $250,000 instead of recusing himself.
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/ci_7746480
Taylor
12-19-2007, 04:10 AM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/localnews/ci_7758395
Cardell Brown, a sexual predator hired by the San Mateo juvenile probation department to be a counselor at a group home, raped five boys there last year and was sentencted to six years in jail. Now the boys are suing the County.
The Dr. Ayres case was cited by the boys' lawyer in the article. He claims that "the county should have exercised a 'heightened duty' to ensure the facilities were free of sexual abuse, especially in light of the current criminal prosecution against Dr. Ayres".
The County ignored warning signs about Dr. Ayres for decades.
Michael Stogner
12-19-2007, 09:03 AM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/localnews/ci_7758395
Cardell Brown, a sexual predator hired by the San Mateo juvenile probation department to be a counselor at a group home, raped five boys there last year and was sentencted to six years in jail. Now the boys are suing the County.
The Dr. Ayres case was cited by the boys' lawyer in the article. He claims that "the county should have exercised a 'heightened duty' to ensure the facilities were free of sexual abuse, especially in light of the current criminal prosecution against Dr. Ayres".
The County ignored warning signs about Dr. Ayres for decades.
Taylor,
He is serving a 4 year prison term not 6 years in jail. He was employed by SMC Project 90 houses for only 90 days, he was charged with 36 counts.
He was a convicted felon when he was hired.
No arrest/booking photo made public by the Sheriff Department or DA'S Office. This case never went to trial.
Taylor
12-20-2007, 06:53 AM
Let's see.... he's got a very expensive lawyer Doron Weinberg for his criminal case. He's being sued by four victims in molestation civil suits. That means more lawyers. AND he's suing his former insurance company. Even more lawyers to pay !
Ayres will be a busy man in 2008 running from case to case,but how on earth is going to afford all this ?
Unlike Phil Spector, Weinberg's much higher profile client, Ayres does not have unlimited funds. What is he gonna do ?
Michael Stogner
12-20-2007, 08:07 AM
Let's see.... he's got a very expensive lawyer Doron Weinberg for his criminal case. He's being sued by four victims in molestation civil suits. That means more lawyers. AND he's suing his former insurance company. Even more lawyers to pay !
Ayres will be a busy man in 2008 running from case to case,but how on earth is going to afford all this ?
Unlike Phil Spector, Weinberg's much higher profile client, Ayres does not have unlimited funds. What is he gonna do ?
Taylor,
Dr. William Ayres will run, die, or spend the rest of his life in prison.
We the ordinary people of San Mateo County have James P. Fox and Marta Diaz to thank for this nightmare. Dr. Ayres should have been charged in 1987 with the Greg Hogue case.
The Grand Jury should ask Mr. Fox why he did not charge him in 1987.
Thanks Mr. Fox for protecting the children in SMC
I have met Dr. Ayres and I can say that while, on the surface, he can appear friendly, cooperative and personable, there is something seriously "off" about the guy. Reporters have described his attempts at friendly small talk as CREEPY and weird (Recalling his days as a "sex educator", he told one reporter, unbidden, of course, that women used to think soda pop could be used as a contraceptive. HUH??!!!)
It angers me to see his lawyer, Doron Weinberg, dare to describe the dozens of complaints about Ayres received by police before the warrant, as well as his hesitantly-acknowledged-but-never-quite-adequately-explained habit of giving boy patients full-body nude exams, as being an "unprecedented" and "purely speculative" basis for an exemption to be made to Ayres's "psychotherapist-patient privilege"
As if there wasn't enough smoke coming out to indicate fire underneath.
Ayres, abetted by Weinberg, has lied and used various attention-diverting and delaying strategies since this case was startedm but someday, he is going to have confront the reality of his unwarranted "exams", and come out of his personal Bizarro world and deal with the real world, in which he's been given the benefit of the doubt MANY, MANY, MANY more times than he deserves.
Has anyone on this discussion group seen the 1931 film "M", starring Peter Lorre? ("I can't help what I do!...Who knows what it's like to be me??!!") I predict a similar denouement for Ayres, provided he can somehow be prodded out of his deep denial.
Taylor
12-30-2007, 04:29 AM
December 29, San Mateo County Times:
A roundup of the top crime stories in San Mateo County this year:
The Dr. Ayres case is number one. Let us hope for a conviction in 2008.
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/localnews/ci_7836714
shadow
12-30-2007, 04:47 AM
The article says that Dr. Ayres' lawyer will try to appeal the decision to throw out the search warrant and also to dismiss the charges. They will not succeed.
Perhaps from now on the papers should refer to him as Mr. Ayres. The Attorney General has suspended his medical license. And I would think that he is no longer welcome at the annual meetings of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry or the American Psychiatric Association .
Taylor
12-30-2007, 02:43 PM
And it will, you can bet on that.
What I would like to know is how Ayres is going to explain away the fact that in the 2005 civil suit he told the victim's lawyers that he gave maybe two or three physicals to kids in all the years he was practising ? And yet he told his partners he did them all the time... he was trained to do that in Boston. How come people who trained with him in Boston aren't buying that ?
It would seem to me that if Ayres is on the stand he has a lot of "splainin'" to do... he's gonna twist himself in knots. Let us hope that in 2008, all of his victims have a chance to make their voices heard !
katherine m
01-03-2008, 02:06 PM
Dr. Bryant was one of Ayres' partners who knew that he was undressing boys. She said nothing. Psychiatrist Dr. Al Rainieri knew that Ayres was undressing boys. He had his suspicions. He did nothing.
There are stories that psychologist Al Fricke knew too and did nothing.
There must be dozens of others in the mental health field who did nothing. Shame on those mental health professionals who covered for Ayres for decades and permitted him to keep on molesting boys. The County is as complicit as the Catholic Church. How did Ayres snow them for so long ?
nitamac
01-03-2008, 03:59 PM
My son was seen by Ayres but says Ayres did not molest him. Ayres knew who he could and could not Victimize he was a psychiatrist for goodness sake. My question is this...
If giving physicals was part of his treatment plan then why didn't he give my son a physical why didn't he every boy he seen? This is my opinion why, He knew who he could inteminate and who he could not.
Ayres partners never spoke up NOBODY spoke up for these boys.
NOBODY ever wants to talk about "it"
You can see on the website of KCBS channel in an April 2007 report on Ayres, that they conducted an interview with a former patient of Ayres who wanted to remain anonymous who said that when he saw Ayres as a young teen, Ayres gave him a nude full-body exam and he was made to understand that nude exams were "routine".
The man says he wasn't molested, but now that the accusations have come out about some of Ayres's "exams" went further than just looking - involving touching and stroking boys' penises (and according to what we know now from the criminal charges, even anal probing), he began to wonder if the "exam" Ayres made him undergo was really neccessary. (you can find the video here)
http://cbs5.com/local/molestation.san.mateo.2.454492.html
Ayres is a clever and manipulative pedophile, who knows how to select and "groom" his victims. If he could see that the child was more defiant than cooperative, he knew better than to initiate a molestation. But, (in contradiction to a deposition in which he claimed that he only rarely did nude exams) he seems to have taken advantage of the opportunity to make boys strip for him, when he determined he could easily get away with it.
Taylor
01-10-2008, 08:14 AM
In the 2004 molestation civil suit against Dr. Ayres, the boy's lawyer asked Dr. Ayres how many times and how often in his entire 40 years of practising had he asked a child to take his pants down.
Here's what Dr. Ayres said: " I don't know that I have ever asked a child to take their pants down."
How is he going to reconcile what he said there with this anecdote in a story about these physical exams in the San Mateo County Times in September ?:
Excerpt from story:
One of Ayres' patients, a teenage boy, had refused to return to see him, complaining to his mother that the doctor had tried to administer a physical exam. When the boy's mother called Peninsula Psychiatrics, Ayres' group, to express her surprise, Ayres gathered his associates during lunch to formally justify his use of physicals exams, said Dr. Hugh Ridlehuber.
And really, what were his partners thinking ? Were they sleepwalking ?
Taylor
01-14-2008, 01:16 PM
The pre- trial conference in the Ayres case is tomorrow, January 15, for those who wish to stay informed.
Taylor
01-15-2008, 04:26 PM
Ayres' lawyer appealed the judges ruling about the legality of the search warrant. Instead of a judge, it's Attorney General Jerry Brown's office who will decide whether the warrant was legal.
That's gotta be bad news for Ayres.
The man is truly in his own world. How much longer can he pay Weinberg to spout bull**** about how he's being victimized and (as he said at today's hearing) has suffered "irreparable damage" from this criminal case that IS THE RESULT OF HIS OWN BEHAVIOR that several dozen victims have attested to?
It just goes to show, if you've got the money, you can pay a shyster like Weinberg to prop up your fantasies. Eventually he's going to have to answer questions and not just rely on Weinberg to come up with ever-changing rationalizations and increasingly desperate and silly searches for legal loopholes.
Michael Stogner
01-15-2008, 07:27 PM
Ayres' lawyer appealed the judges ruling about the legality of the search warrant. Instead of a judge, it's Attorney General Jerry Brown's office who will decide whether the warrant was legal.
That's gotta be bad news for Ayres.
That's going to be BAD NEWS for San Mateo County.
Not just Mr. Ayres.....
Welcome to San Mateo County
Taylor
01-15-2008, 09:46 PM
There will be an appeal before a judge, but the Attorney General's office will stand in for the San Mateo DA's office. Standard procedure, I think.
Taylor
01-16-2008, 08:22 AM
So, Ayres' lawyer says that Ayres is "suffering irreparable damage" because of the "illegal search ?" Awwwww...
So, let's see . What might the damage to Ayres be ? That he is no longer welcome to attend annual meetings of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and sit on the stage with all of the past presidents ?
Or is the problem for him more local ? According to some citizens, Ayres is no longer seen at his usual haunts like Il Fornaio.
Sorry, the damage done to him is nothing compared to the dozens and dozens of victims whose lives he has scarred and damaged.
Last spring, didn't Doron Weinberg say "Dr. Ayres... is committed to defending himself against these charges and resurrecting his reputation"
Well? You don't "resurrect your reputation" by looking for legal dodges and trying to invalidate evidence, you confront the accusations!
You don't "resurrect your reputation" by saying that, rather than supporting "probable cause" for a search warrant, the testimony from numerous boys that Ayres undressed and fondled them before 1985 is in fact "stale" evidence! See? It doesn't mean that he's a pedophile who continued to molest boys. Oh, no, it means that if anything ever happened it probably stopped right before criminal statute would kick in. According to Weinberg, accused pedophiles often stop molesting just in time so it doesn't fall under criminal statute.
Now how could the court be so unjust as to "damage" Ayres for things he didn't do that the police shouldn't have found out about anyway because there was no reason to suspect him in the first place? Viola! Presto-change-o! Weinberg turns Ayres from predator to victim. Welcome to Weinberg's bizzaro-world! Anybody buying it?
Taylor
01-18-2008, 04:10 PM
Barring any delays: the trial of Ayres is March 10.
For the sake of the victims, let us get the show on the road. Ayres is out on bail and busy going to the symphony in San Francisco (where he walked right past one of the mothers of one his victims, much to her anger and disgust) . Meanwhile, his victims are suffering enormously. Ayres may deny it, but he knew exactly what he was doing and he knows that it was wrong.
That's why he got caught. Karmic payback. There is justice in this world.
Taylor
01-19-2008, 05:28 AM
From January 16 Daily Journal:
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=86000&eddate=01/16/2008
Sooner or later the trial will happen. The victims will have their say in court.
Taylor
01-20-2008, 02:24 PM
Victims of Dr. Ayres:
We know there are so many more of you out there who have not come forward. The San Mateo PD believes that for every victim who has come forward, there are 2 more out there who have not.
There is still time to come forward before the trial.
Call prosecutor Melissa McKowan: 650-363-4774
or Detective Rick Decker: 650-522-7654
We know there are many boys from Hillcrest Juvenile Hall who were molested. At the pre-trial hearing, Detective Decker recounted the story from a juvenile who said that Ayres had threatened him." I'm a doctor," Ayres told the boy. "Who's going to believe you, a troubled teenager, over me ?"
Well, guess what ? We will believe those troubled teenagers over Ayres any day.
(Since his medical license has been suspended, we will not refer to him as "Dr.")
So, victims, please come forward. It can only help you.
Taylor
02-04-2008, 06:58 PM
For some reason the Ayres trial was pushed back. His lawyer says he has prostate cancer and that he would be too weak from chemo to attend daily sessions in court.
Then how come Ayres was seen not long ago at the symphony in
San Francisco ?
These delays seem suspect. If anyone sees Ayres out and about at the symphony again, or at Costco or wherever, please let us know here !
Taylor
02-04-2008, 08:46 PM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/BAURURQNB.DTL
Note the comment sections. Not very sympathetic towards Ayres.
Again, I am sure the victims would love to know if Ayres is well enough to be making more excursions to the symphony and other entertainment.
I hear he looked quite well at the hearing today.
Taylor
02-05-2008, 08:06 AM
http://www.topix.com/forum/source/burlingame-daily-news/TGKH4DNSODHIAQQ5I/p2
She even lists his license number on his car and what restaurants he hangs out with.
Read Jane Doe's postings. This is a woman who has an intimate knowledge of Ayres' activities.
Taylor
02-06-2008, 06:32 AM
Story on delay of Ayres' trial in today's San Francisco Examiner:
http://www.examiner.com/a-1203924~Ayres__alleged_victims_vexed_at_trial_s_de lay.html
Quote from Ayres victim Steve Abrams: " I suspect this is a ploy on his part to buy time and gain sympathy. I'm afraid he'll delay if for so long, or somehow get a pass because he's old and sick, that he's going to avoid responsibility for what he's done, " said 44-year-old Steve Abrams, who claims he was molested at the age of 12 and whose civil suit against him was settled out of court in 2005.
According to Dave Clohessy, the national director for SNAP, for victims of pedophile priests, pulling the sick card is a favorite ploy among pedophiles.
Ayres will have his day in court. I have no doubt of that.
Taylor
02-07-2008, 09:57 AM
Onbekendebron, if you are still reading this Dr. Ayres thread, I sent you a private message here. Hope to hear from you.
Taylor
02-08-2008, 06:21 AM
According to "Jane Doe", who posts regularly on the Burlingame Daily News site, Ayres was spotted speeding down California Avenue in Burlingame yesterday. If he can drive a car, then he can sit in a courtroom.
http://www.topix.com/forum/source/burlingame-daily-news/TNFKKENRRH9QO05PH
I have no idea who Jane Doe is, but she has been keeping close tabs on Ayres' comings and goings for some time now. Who knows ? Maybe she's a private investigator ? Or maybe a mother of a victim ?
Michael Stogner
02-08-2008, 09:45 AM
According to "Jane Doe", who posts regularly on the Burlingame Daily News site, Ayres was spotted speeding down California Avenue in Burlingame yesterday. If he can drive a car, then he can sit in a courtroom.
http://www.topix.com/forum/source/burlingame-daily-news/TNFKKENRRH9QO05PH
I have no idea who Jane Doe is, but she has been keeping close tabs on Ayres' comings and goings for some time now. Who knows ? Maybe she's a private investigator ? Or maybe a mother of a victim ?
Good work Jane Doe,
Perhaps photos would help the Judge in this case.
Don't forget Greg Hogue and his mother reported Dr. William Ayres back in 1987. He seems to have received special treatment from (some) in the Law Enforcement Industry of San Mateo County
voiceinyourhead
02-08-2008, 01:43 PM
Stogner: How are photos going to help anything? And if you're so up in arms, where were you in 1987? Do you have any information, other than your typical rampant speculation and conjecture, that any of what you claim happened, actually happened?
Taylor
02-08-2008, 02:03 PM
I can't speak for Stogner on other cases, but he is right that the San Mateo PD seems to have given Ayres a pass in 1987 after victim Greg Hogue came forward to say he that Ayres had been molested. This has been documented by the San Francisco Chronicle. The Chronicle quotes Hogue as saying that after he made the police complaint, Ayres mysteriously sent his mother a check for $1000. At the urging of Greg's mother's therapist, who suspected it was a bribe to keep quiet, the mother turned the check over to officer Rick Nielsen at the San Mateo PD. The check - and Greg Hogue's file -were subsequently "lost." How come ? What did Nielsen do with the check ? We don't know the answers to this but I would like to see a grand jury investigate.
shadow
02-11-2008, 07:11 AM
A friend of mine believes he saw Ayres at the farmer's market at the College of San Mateo this past weekend.
shadow
02-16-2008, 07:19 AM
http://www.theburlingamedailynews.com/article/2008-2-16-escapee
So, supervisor Rich Gordon is demanding an explanation as to how a 17 year old wanted for murder escaped from Hillcrest.
While he's at it, he may want to look at Hillcrest juvenile judge Marta Diaz and her cozy working relationship with Dr. Ayres. The people of San Mateo would like to know why she continued to send boys to Ayres after she learned that the police were investigating him. They would also like to know why she told the cops to be real careful investigating Ayres.
Michael Stogner
02-16-2008, 10:09 PM
http://www.theburlingamedailynews.com/article/2008-2-16-escapee
So, supervisor Rich Gordon is demanding an explanation as to how a 17 year old wanted for murder escaped from Hillcrest.
While he's at it, he may want to look at Hillcrest juvenile judge Marta Diaz and her cozy working relationship with Dr. Ayres. The people of San Mateo would like to know why she continued to send boys to Ayres after she learned that the police were investigating him. They would also like to know why she told the cops to be real careful investigating Ayres.
Supervisor Rich Gordon has no interest in that subject.
shadow
02-29-2008, 12:36 PM
Has anyone seen them having lunch or dinner together ? We would love to hear of anyone who remembers seeing them socialize with or without their respective spouses.
Why did Diaz continue to support Ayres when she knew the police were investigating him ? Why did she continue to send boys to him ? And why isn't a grand jury investigating Diaz, and the doctors who did not report Ayres even though they knew he was undressing kids ?
Taylor
03-02-2008, 06:04 PM
Greg Hogue, the first victim to come forward, would like some answers as to the original police investigation into Ayres. We hear that Greg asked the San Mateo PD to speak to original investigating officer Rick Nielsen( now retired) but they refused to let him speak with them.
We hate to keep sounding like a broken record but if a grand jury won't look into the agencies and people like doctors and cops who failed to protect Greg Hogue and all the boys who were molested after that, then who will ?
We also hear that another former juvenile judge says that Judge Marta Diaz's beliefs in Ayres affected her judgement in this case.
Who will investigate ?
Michael Stogner
03-02-2008, 09:40 PM
Greg Hogue, the first victim to come forward, would like some answers as to the original police investigation into Ayres. We hear that Greg asked the San Mateo PD to speak to original investigating officer Rick Nielsen( now retired) but they refused to let him speak with them.
We hate to keep sounding like a broken record but if a grand jury won't look into the agencies and people like doctors and cops who failed to protect Greg Hogue and all the boys who were molested after that, then who will ?
We also hear that another former juvenile judge says that Judge Marta Diaz's beliefs in Ayres affected her judgement in this case.
Who will investigate ?
Taylor,
This site The San Mateo Daily Journal is read by the District Attorneys Office, The Sheriff's Office and others in the law enforcement industry of San Mateo County. Its fair to say that James P. Fox is aware of this thread.
The Grand Jury only responds to formal requests. I will check to see if anyone has made a formal request to investigate those mentioned in this thread. In the event that no one has submitted a formal request, I will make that request. Please draft the formal request that you and others would like me to make to the Grand Jury. I will post the formal request.
Best of Luck
PS The Hon. Judge Carl Holm is now in the Juvenile Court
Taylor
03-03-2008, 07:28 AM
It is my understanding that the Citizens Review Panel made a formal request to the civil grand jury to investigate, but the grand jury says they don't have the power to investigate the judiciary and doctors who knew what Ayres was doing, etc. So if, they don't, who does ?
katherine m
03-03-2008, 05:11 PM
I do not know if it is the job of the reporters or the grand jury or the district attorney's office or the attorney general's office, but someone or some agency does need to get their feet wet and get to the bottom of the wrongdoings and cronyism by Judge Diaz, Childrens Services, and the doctors who knew what Ayres was doing.
Suggestions, anybody ?
Taylor
03-04-2008, 07:40 AM
Check your private message box. Thanks
shadow
03-07-2008, 07:39 AM
This was recently posted on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka8qSpjB17g&session=benJoD0vmkbvsVwdztJ_tKs47HOa-nZ-AtCBFUp8pBonYsNcc2Odh_JXeg-oqPQDUtY_vWXWz8UEfgUkxAUktE9alGcDgfMVuye1Q-jaAfFTTgpOlZq6B_fiBESkv15xfGc0IUIsDdQ98ygucjHJ_NW7 qwH9tHpCLywJ9QOwbZtS2AYYsPbiOyrFEYgHZB3c-nh-wU28umC8cQevpfMtvh8jM1owlxJOBQJIPrChEMNMG_nx5mwRfE NGrq5jsKnxRhRVo_LZferKKxixfwIJGLI6jY7UOun5
Glenn Beck: " When a child is molested, a part of them dies."
Taylor
03-10-2008, 12:16 PM
check your regular email. Thanks.
Taylor
03-11-2008, 07:23 PM
This just in - Appeals court will hear Ayres case as to whether search warrant was legal.
Michael Stogner
03-11-2008, 09:17 PM
This just in - Appeals court will hear Ayres case as to whether search warrant was legal.
Is there a date yet?
Taylor
03-12-2008, 02:14 AM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/ci_8538226
Correction: It's Judge Runde who has to put on a new hearing, not the appeals court. And so it drags on !
Many of us would be interested to hear if Ayres is spotted at his usual activities, like going to the symphony and eating at Kincaids.
nitamac
03-12-2008, 06:07 PM
when does Ayres trial start?
shadow
03-12-2008, 08:45 PM
but I am sure they will try to delay and delay.
OnbekendeBron
03-13-2008, 03:16 PM
check your regular email. Thanks.
Thanks. Please check yours.
katherine m
03-18-2008, 06:01 PM
so that's good. He will be able to sit through a trial and listen to the damning evidence against him. Meanwhile, does anyone have any information on his good old pal Dr. Etta Bryant, who wrote a letter to the County Times defending his "physicals"? Has she gone to prosecutor Melissa Mckowan yet ? And if not, why not ?
shadow
03-19-2008, 09:08 AM
Someone posting at the Burlingame Daily News saw Ayres with his wife at the Balboa Bay Club last month. As others have noted, if he's well enough to attend the symphony and go to restaurants, then he is well enough to sit at a trial and listen to victims talk about what he did to them.
http://www.topix.com/forum/source/burlingame-daily-news/TNFKKENRRH9QO05PH/p4#lastPost
Michael Stogner
03-21-2008, 07:40 AM
http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=89113
Antipathy to counsel.
I said it in the beginning, this case should be moved out of San Mateo County.
Michael Stogner
03-21-2008, 08:27 AM
Antipathy
Inherent aversion or antagonism of feeling; repugnancy;
revulsion;as, antipathy to snakes; antipathy to an offensive person.
Incompatibility, in a physical or chemical sense
Opposition in character, nature, tendency, etc.
any object of strong dislike or repugnancy.
Taylor
03-21-2008, 11:51 AM
I feel "antipathy" towards Doron Weinberg too. He better not even think about trashing the victims during the trial.
shadow
03-21-2008, 12:13 PM
If you want justice, and have not yet come forward to the police, now is the time. It is the collective voices of the victims that can beat Ayres.
Contact Detective Rick Decker" 650-522-7654
katherine m
03-21-2008, 03:42 PM
After all, it was Dr. Bryant who wrote that nice little letter to the San Mateo County Times saying that giving "physicals" to boys during therapy was all perfectly normal and routine.
We would like to know if Bryant was ever made aware of "physicals" by Ayres that were not so "routine", and were, in fact, rather alarming.
shadow
03-22-2008, 06:08 PM
http://www.examiner.com/a-1294777~No_delays_seen_for_Ayres_trial.html
They're filing a suit saying that the warrant violated patient/doctor confidentiality ? Huh ? I thought shrinks were supposed to care about victims. Shoddy and shocking.. Citizens of San Mateo who are outraged should write to the California Psychiatric Association at:
calpsyh@calpsych.org
Make your voice count !
shadow
03-22-2008, 08:08 PM
That's calpsych@calpsych.org
Taylor
03-23-2008, 05:03 AM
No wonder they're going to bat for Ayres.
In 1989, the Northern California Psychiatric Society, which is affiliated with the California Psychiatric Association gave Ayres the "Presidents Distinguished Service Award>"
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:Xe_RjKEO7j4J:www.ncps.org/historical/Awards.pdf+California+Psychiatric+Association-+William+Ayres&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
shadow
03-23-2008, 05:27 AM
Parents of victims and victims should contact California Psychiatric Association president Barbara Gard to ask her why her organization has not made any statement of concern for the victims of Ayres. No doubt she knows none of the details.
email: Barbara-Gard@calpsych.org
Phone: 916-442-5196
Taylor
03-25-2008, 07:05 AM
Posted at the Burlingame Daily News Forum yesterday:
Jane Doe
Redwood City, CA
#99
17 hrs ago
Saw Ayres about a half hour ago driving his old BMW with Solveig in passenger side in the downdown section of Burlingame, on Primrose Road. He was wearing his usual dreadful baseball cap, with these horrid plaid shirts that make him look like a distant relative of Ted Kosinski!
shadow
04-04-2008, 12:00 PM
Dr. Mel Levine, a pediatrician is being sued by seven men who claim that he sexually molested them when they were boys... Very similar details to the Ayres case. Additionally, Levine, who once appeared on the Oprah Winfrey, once upon a time worked in Boston. As did Ayres.... hmmm....
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view.bg?articleid=1084201&srvc=rss
Taylor
04-04-2008, 03:54 PM
and find out if Ayres, Dr. Mel Levine, and Dr. Don Rife ( who trained at the same place as Ayres in Boston, Judge Baker Guidance Center around the same time in the 60's and also was later busted for molesting young boys,using the same MO as Ayres and Levine) all know each other. Mel Levine was at Harvard Medical School and Ayres claims he taught there. ... Birds of a feather usually flock together.
katherine m
04-05-2008, 02:55 AM
Let us get the trial underway and let the victims have their day in court.
Taylor
04-05-2008, 03:49 AM
http://www.strmz.com/Channel3156?link=http://youtube.com%2F%3Fv%3D-hjTU8SzVFY
Michael Stogner
04-05-2008, 10:11 AM
William Ayres
April 8, 2008 1:30PM
katherine m
04-09-2008, 07:12 AM
Next court date is May 23, 2008
http://www.examiner.com/a-1328980~Delay_granted_in_suppression_hearing.html
shadow
05-22-2008, 05:40 AM
Jane Doe from Redwood City, CA posted this on the Burlingame Daily News yesterday:
Ayres was in downtown Burlingame today at lunch time. Wearing his baseball cap. He should wera that cap to court I guarantee they would throw him the slammer! He looks very weird. Must be well enough for the May 23rd court date.....
katherine m
05-24-2008, 08:26 AM
reports that Ayres' wife went up to the mother of a victim outside the courtroom yeterday and said "God knows the truth about this" and that the mother was so upset she complained to the bailiff. The bailiff told Ayres' wife not to do it again.
shadow
05-24-2008, 09:04 AM
http://www.theburlingamedailynews.com/article/bdn/2008-5-24-smc-ayres
efto1
05-25-2008, 01:39 PM
Defense should be allowed to make that motion, but prosecutors should also stipulate they will provided Mr. Ayers agrees to submit himself for a polygraph at the VeraCenter!
This not only would clear Mr. Ayers of any guilt on his part, it also lets prosecution know they do not have a valid case to file against him. If Mr. Ayers in innocent, the quickest way he can prove it, and get them behind him
is to pass the test. However, if Mr. Ayers fails it, the polygraph should be used against him in the defense of his accuers!
Sappho
05-26-2008, 02:24 AM
The files should only be thrown out if the patients object. None of the patients or former patients objected, so they should remain. Doctor/patient privilege is to protect the patient's privacy, not the doctor's crimes. As for a polygraph test, they are notoriously unreliable, especially with psychopaths, pathological liars and professional psychiatrists.
shadow
06-25-2008, 06:01 PM
Steve Wagstaffe in the DA's office said in an article about the most recent hearing that many victims of Ayres showed up.
Let us hope that they show up en masse at the July 24 hearing. Ayres needs to be reminded of what he has done.
katherine m
07-21-2008, 09:32 AM
According to the Associated Press, the judge will set a trial date and rule on the defense motion to suppress evidence from patient records.
Shadow is right - it would be good for victims to come. July 24. 9:00 AM
shadow
07-21-2008, 03:22 PM
this makes Dr. Ayres and his wife feel some of the heat. One wonders why Mrs. Ayres keeps defending him in the face of so much devastating evidence.
katherine m
07-21-2008, 03:49 PM
this show on the road. Dr. Ayres' first trial date was last March. Then he had prostate cancer and said he was too ill. Yet people have seen him driving and speeding and going to the opera. Meanwhile, the victims continue to suffer horribly for what this man has done to them. Where is the outrage in San Mateo County ? There is talk that the trial might not be til January. This is not right. Ayres will be out and about at the Farmers Market or the Opera (where he has been spotted by the mothers of victims and has ruined their night.)
San Mateo is dilly-dallying. Where is the spine of the judge who will say 'It's time to stop stalling and get this trial underway.'
OnbekendeBron
07-24-2008, 12:40 PM
Defense motion denied.
Pre-trial hearing is set for October 14th, 2008,
Trial set for January 5th, 2009.
Not soon enough, but hopefully these dates will not change.
shadow
07-25-2008, 06:33 PM
The victims are in a tremendous amount of emotional pain and turmoil.
He needs to pay the price. And his wife needs to face the reality. By enabling him all of these years, she has done almost as much damage.
Taylor
07-28-2008, 04:20 PM
since Ayres was arrested. It is as if their memories of the abuse were frozen all these years. Now they're thawed out, and the pain is overwhelming for many of them.
Let us hope that there are no more deaths among the victims.
Taylor
07-30-2008, 07:41 PM
counseling through Victims Services. If anyone is a victim, we recommend that you take advantage of this program.
Michael Stogner
07-30-2008, 10:10 PM
counseling through Victims Services. If anyone is a victim, we recommend that you take advantage of this program.
Taylor, what are the contact numbers for Victims Services?
Keep up the good work.
Taylor
07-31-2008, 07:25 AM
Number is 650-599-7479
Taylor
08-06-2008, 06:18 AM
The New York Times has a front page story today on pediatrician and best-selling author Dr. Mel Levine, who has been accused by 43 men of molesting them when they were little boys. The MO of Levine and Ayres are shockingly similar. Also, disturbingly, Ayres and Levine were both in Boston at the same time in the 1960s and traveling in the same circles at Harvard Medical School. Can anyone out there verify that they knew each other ?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/us/06pediatrician.html?em
Wilson
08-07-2008, 06:00 PM
We think that most victims of Dr. Ayres will not actively seek counseling from a therapist, because they were molested by a therapist. This is an unusual situation. What is the County doing for outreach ? What about the boys who were molested at Hillcrest and have gone on to have criminal records ? Will the District Attorney's office take that under consideration when they try to prosecute a victim of Dr. Ayres ? After all, it was the County's and Childrens Services' fault for ignoring the complaints by boys and warning signs for decades in the first place. It is the County's fault that they signed Dr. Ayres to a big contract with the courts, where his specialty was evalutating sex offenders and those who were abused. Nice work, San Mateo County ! Prosecuting Dr. Ayres is not good enough. There needs to be outreach and reparations for the victims of Dr. Ayres. We know of many who have still not come forward to the police out of shame. Why has not a single member of the Board of Supervisors spoken out about this matter ? Why has no one on any of the sex abuse victims task forces spoken out ? Shame on you, San Mateo County.
Michael Stogner
08-07-2008, 07:59 PM
We think that most victims of Dr. Ayres will not actively seek counseling from a therapist, because they were molested by a therapist. This is an unusual situation. What is the County doing for outreach ? What about the boys who were molested at Hillcrest and have gone on to have criminal records ? Will the District Attorney's office take that under consideration when they try to prosecute a victim of Dr. Ayres ? After all, it was the County's and Childrens Services' fault for ignoring the complaints by boys and warning signs for decades in the first place. It is the County's fault that they signed Dr. Ayres to a big contract with the courts, where his specialty was evalutating sex offenders and those who were abused. Nice work, San Mateo County ! Prosecuting Dr. Ayres is not good enough. There needs to be outreach and reparations for the victims of Dr. Ayres. We know of many who have still not come forward to the police out of shame. Why has not a single member of the Board of Supervisors spoken out about this matter ? Why has no one on any of the sex abuse victims task forces spoken out ? Shame on you, San Mateo County.
Dear Wilson,
I will pass your concerns on to the Board of Supervisors. I believe James P. Fox and Marta Diaz owe an explanation as to why they did not prosecute Dr. William Ayres for the Greg Hogue case.
San Mateo County has no leadership to speak out on this subject. That is why the silence.
voiceinyourhead
08-07-2008, 10:14 PM
How about? How about "better late than never?" How about DDA Melissa McKowen is doing a great job prosecutin gthis case NOW given how difficult these types of cases are, the time against her, memories against her, everything like that?
How about someone come to your job every day Mike and post some random newpaper article about how you're doing a lousy job? How do you think that would make YOU feel? Now put yourself in the position of someone working in the DA's office - think before you post, you arrogant pr__k.
Taylor
08-08-2008, 07:04 AM
Hmm. I think what Mr. Stogner is trying to say is that there had been a number of complaints to the Medical Board, the San Mateo PD and to Ayres' own partners about Dr. Ayres for at least the past twenty years, and most likely earlier than that. Mothers even went to Ayres' own medical partners to complain. If people - in particular his medical partners - had stepped up to the plate as they should have,years ago- then Ayres would have been stopped. But no one did, and so now we have a shocking number of victims. Some have died, quite likely as a result of what Ayres did to them.
No, I wouldn't say in this case, Better Late Than Never. As in the case of the Catholic priests, there were red flags galore about Dr. Ayres but somehow these were ignored and shoved under the rug. Has anyone in the community who works in child sexual abuse ever really examined how this was able to go on for so long ?
Taylor
08-08-2008, 07:07 AM
There's really no need for name calling here, either.
Michael Stogner
08-08-2008, 07:52 AM
How about? How about "better late than never?" How about DDA Melissa McKowen is doing a great job prosecutin gthis case NOW given how difficult these types of cases are, the time against her, memories against her, everything like that?
How about someone come to your job every day Mike and post some random newpaper article about how you're doing a lousy job? How do you think that would make YOU feel? Now put yourself in the position of someone working in the DA's office - think before you post, you arrogant pr__k.
Dear Voice,
I have already said Melissa Mckowen is doing a Great job.
Michael Stogner
08-08-2008, 08:41 AM
I just sent an e-mail to Board President Adrienne Tisser, with this thread.
If anyone else would like to contact the BOS, contact info below.
http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/smc/department/bos/home/0,2151,1864_3028,00.html
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.